Has labor motivation changed in post-Soviet Russia?


Bessokirnaya G.P.

Cand. Sci. (Ec.), Assoc. Prof., Senior Researcher, Institute of Sociology, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia gala@isras.ru

ID of the Article: 6519


For citation:

Bessokirnaya G.P. Has labor motivation changed in post-Soviet Russia?. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2017. No 1. P. 94-105




Abstract

Based on the materials of four sociological studies (2003 to 2014) at a number of industrial enterprises in Russia’s regional centers we conclude that in post-Soviet Russia, the “core”of labor motivation of the work force remains stable. The motives recorded in the Soviet Union since mid-1970s remain extremely important to Russian workers today. Since the beginning of market economy formation, the motive of job security, and, during the 2010 decade, the factor of relationship with the management were added to the list. At this stage of the transformation of Russian society the “core” of the work force motives includes: good wages, work safety, job security, convenient work schedule, good relationships with co-workers, reasonable sanitary and hygienic conditions, relationships with management, interesting, fulfilling work. Specificity of work situation at particular industrial enterprises, as well as various characteristics of the external operational environment (phase of modernization of the region) and the form of ownership (joint-stock or private) of these industrial enterprises have practically no influence on the structure and hierarchy of labor motivations. Emergence of new subjectivity of the work force is possible only with the establishment of specific workplace conditions that meet diverse needs and interests, which are already reflected in the labor motives of the absolute majority of the workers. Besides the core motivations, they include: utilization of abilities and skills, as well as opportunity to socialize with other people.


Keywords
labor motivation; work situation; type of region; form of enterprise ownership; work force

References

Andrianova E.V. (2014) Izmenenie paradigmy motivacii i cennostej truda v kontekste razvitiya novoj ehkonomicheskoj sociologii [A paradigm shift motivation and labor values in the context of the new economic sociology development]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 8: 57–63. (In Russ.)

Andrianova E.V., Davydenko V.A. (2010) Transformaciya sistemy motivacii truda i trudovyh otnoshenij v usloviyah krizisa: na primere Tyumenskoj oblasti [Transformation of the labour motivation and labour relations system in crisis conditions: an example of Tyumen region]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 4: 55–61. (In Russ.)

Andrianova E.V., Romashkina G.F. (2011a) Social’no-ehkonomicheskaya obuslovlennost’ trudovyh motivov lyudej, rabotayushchih po najmu na primere razlichnyh predpriyatij Tyumenskoj oblasti [Socio-economic conditionality of labor motivation of employees in a various enterprises of Tyumen region]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. No. 1: 104–111. (In Russ.)

Andrianova E.V., Romashkina G.F. (2011b) Trudovaya motivaciya: problemy, sostoyanie, perspektivy. Nauchnyj potencial regionov na sluzhbu modernizacii [Work motivation: challenges, condition, prospects]. No. 1: 154–160. (In Russ.)

Bessokirnaya G.P. Dinamika cennosti i motivov truda rabochih (2003–2007) [Dynamics of values and motives for work]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. 2010. No. 2: 56–63. (In Russ.)

Bessokirnaya G.P. Motivaciya truda: opyt i metodiki issledovanij v Rossii (1990–2010) [Researching labor motivation in post-reform Russia, 1990–2010th]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. 2016. № 2: 29–38. (In Russ.)

Bessokirnaya G.P., Temnickij A.L. (2013) Rabochie v reformiruyushchejsya Rossii kak ob”ekt upravleniya i sub”ekt truda [Workers in reforming Russia as object of management and subject of work]. Mir Rossii: sociologiya, ehtnologiya [Universe of Russia: sociology, ethnology] T. 22. No. 3: 115–151. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (ed.) (2016) Zhiznennyj mir rossiyan: 25 let spustya (konec1980 – seredina 2010) [The life-world of Russians: 25 years later (late 1980s to mid – 2010s)]. Moscow: CSP. (In Russ.)

Zdravomyslov A.G., Yadov V.A. (2003) Chelovek i ego rabota v SSSR i posle [Man and his work in the USSR and after]. 2-e izd., isp. i dop. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russ.)

Kunyavskij M.B., Moin V.B., Popova I.M. Soznanie i trudovaya deyatel’nost’ (cennostnye aspekty soznaniya, verbal’noe i fakticheskoe povedenie v sfere truda) [Consciousness and work (evaluative aspects of consciousness, verbal and actual behavior in the workplace)]. Kiev–Odessa: Vysshaya shkola, 1985. (In Russ.)

Lapin N.I. Issues of concept and human dimensions making of the gradual modernization strategy for Russia and its regions. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological studies]. 2014. No. 7: 8–19. (In Russ.)

Popov A.V. Sovremennye aspekty trudovoj motivacii naseleniya [Modern aspects of population’s labour motivation]. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya. 2013. Vyp 2: 1–9. (In Russ.)

Popova I. M., Bessokirnaya G. P. (2005) Izmenilas’ li motivaciya truda rabochih v 1990-e gody? (metodologiya izucheniya, rezul’taty i perspektivy issledovanij) [Have you changed the workers motivation in 1990th?] (the methodology of the study, the results and prospects of research)]. Mir Rossii: sociologiya, ehtnologiya. [Universe of Russia: sociology, ethnology] T. 14. No. 4: 105–137. (In Russ.)

Popova I.P. (2008) Samostoyatel’nost’ v rabote: tendencii desyatiletiya [Autonomy at work: trends of the decade]. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia: sociology, ethnology]. No. 4: 135–151. (In Russ.)

Temnickij A.L. (2012) K probleme stanovleniya novoj sub”ektnosti rabochih [To the issue of workers new subjectivity formation]. In: Sociologiya i obshchestvo: global’nye vyzovy i regional’noe razvitie [EHlektronnyj resurs]: Materialy IV Ocherednogo Vserossijskogo sociologicheskogo kongressa / ROS, IS RAN, AN RB, ISPPI. M.: ROS. URL: http://www.isras.ru/files/File/congress2012/part11.pdf. S.4626–4634 (accessed 22.06.2016). (In Russ.)

Temnickij A.L. (2011) Independence at work as factor for Russian workers’ subject-making. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 12: 35–42. (In Russ.)

Tipy regionov po urovnyu social’no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya [regions’ types in terms of socio-economic development]. In: Oficial’nyj portal Nezavisimogo instituta social’noj politiki. URL: http: //www.socpol.ru/atlas/typology/Typology_tabl.htm (accessed 7.03.2016). (In Russ.)

Trud i zanyatost’ v Rossii (2015) [Labour and employment in Russia]. In: Rosstat. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Yadov V.A., Kissel’ A.A. Udovletvorennost’ rabotoj: analiz ehmpiricheskih obobshchenij i popytka ih teoreticheskogo istolkovaniya [Job satisfaction: empirical generalizations and attempt their theoretical interpretation]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. 1974. No. 1: 78–87. (In Russ.)

Content No 1, 2017