Orthodoxy historical drama against the background of the conflict between truth and politics


Makarenko V.P.

Dr. Sci. (Pol., Philos.), Prof., Chief Researcher, Center for Political Conceptology, Institute of Philosophy and Social and Political Sciences, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia vpmakar1985@gmail.com

ID of the Article: 6792


For citation:

Makarenko V.P. Orthodoxy historical drama against the background of the conflict between truth and politics. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2017. No 7. P. 141-150




Abstract

The article analyzes the statements of Russian Orthodox church (ROC) officials of the Moscow Patriarchate applying methods of political conceptology and in-depth reading. They allow to discover those moments in the bodys of intellectual-politically significant books that are not taken into account or consciously dispensed with in their formal perceptions and canonical interpretations. The linguistic, semantic and ideological structure of public speech is described taking into account the general properties of political language and specifics of their manifestation in the political history of Russia. The problem of reproduction of the opposition between truth and politics in modern Russia is posed. To analyze it, modern forms of conflict between the political and legal approach to the design of court trials are described and the measures of individual, group, social, national and institutional collaboration with government bodies in Russia are revealed. This measure determines the cognitive and social preconditions for a chain of lies and cynicism, on which collaboratism is based in relation to the existing power. It cultivates thinking in the style of raison d’etat (the state mind), which before met only in the field of foreign affairs and in situations of direct and undoubted threat. This is the basis of state propaganda. As a result, the web of deception became all-common, and the international conflict boomerangs to the scene of domestic politics. The controversial nature of the cognitive-evaluation matrix of American Russian studies is described. A contradiction has been stated between the fundamentalism and creativity that has developed in the ROC over the past hundred years. It is directly related to the modern ROC. The problem consists in comprehending those directions of Orthodox thought that allow us to describe the historical drama of Orthodoxy and discover in it the prerequisites for realizing the relationship between Orthodoxy and the democracy.


Keywords
Orthodoxy; truth; politics; democracy

References

Acton E., Rosenberg U. G., Chernyaev V. Y. (2014) Critical Dictionary of the Russian Revolution: 1914–1921. Saint-Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)

Arendt H. (2014) Truth and Politics. In: Arendt H. Between pro-shlym and future. The eight exercises in political thought. Trans. from Engl. and Germ. D. Aronson. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara. (In Russ.)

Bikbov A. T. (2014). The order of Grammar: Historical sociology concepts that are changing our reality. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshey shcoly ekonomiki. (In Russ.)

Billington D. (2001) The Icon and the Axe: the experience of interpreting the history of Russian culture. Moscow: Rudomino. (In Russ.)

Billington D. (2009) Christianity and democracy. Herald of Europe. No. 26–27. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/vestnik/2009/26/ bi25.html (accessed 02.12.2016).

Birman I. (2001) I – Economist (about how cool). Moscow: Vremya. (In Russ.)

Bohensky J. (1993) One hundred and superstitions: Short Philosophical Dictionary predisposition-cruets. Trans. from Pol. Moscow: Izdatel’skaya gruppa “Progress” – “VIA”.

Dahl R. (2003) Democracy and its critics. Trans. from Eng. Ed. by M. V. Ilina. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Danto A. (2002) Analytical philosophy of history. Ed. by L. B. Makeeva. Moscow: Idea-Press. (In Russ.)

Fedorov V. F. (2012). Orthodox: pro et contra. Why pro et contra? In: Pravoslavie as a factor in the formation of Russian statehood and the cultture, an anthology. Saint-Petersburg: RkhGA: 14–46. (In Russ.)

Foucaul M. (2011). Security, territory, population. Lectures, readtion at the Collège de France in the 1977–1978 academic year. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Golushko N. M. (2014) KGB of Ukraine. Last Chairman. In 2 Vol. 1–2. Moscow: Interbuk business. (In Russ.)

Intelligent alarm: the problem lies and cynicism in politics. 2015. Ed. by V. P. Makarenko. Rostov-on-Don: SFU. (In Russ.)

Kartashov A. (1992) Collected Works: In 2 v. V. 1: Essays on the history of Russian-tion of the Church. Moscow: TERRA. (In Russ.)

Kondratieff T. (2006) Feeding and rule: to power in Russia HU1 and twentieth centuries. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Kostyuk K. N. (2000) Orthodox fundamentalism. POLIS Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political studies]. No. 5: 133–154. (In Russ.)

Kostyuk K. N. (2002) Three portraits: socio-ethical views in the Russian Orthodox Church of the late twentieth century. Continent. No. 113. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/continent/2002/113/kost.html (accessed 15.03.2017). (In Russ.)

Koyre A. (2003) The philosophy and a national problem in Russia in the early XIX century. Moscow: Modesto Kohler. (In Russ.)

Kyrlezhev A. (2011) Preface. A. Schmemann, prot. Collection of articles, 1947–1983 / Fr Alexander Schmemann. 2 ed. Moscow: Russian way. (In Russ.)

Ledyaev V. G. (2001) Power: conceptual analysis. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Lubskyj A. V. (2005) Alternative models of historical research. Moscow: Publishing House of the “Social-humanitarian knowledge”. (In Russ.)

Makarenko V. P. (2006) Justice and the problem of changes in the status quo. Economics. No. 2: 45–62. (In Russ.)

Makarenko V. P. (2009) Political Conceptology: first results development. POLIS Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political studies]. No. 6: 146–167. (In Russ.)

Makarenko V. P. (2016) Russian power and the bureaucratic state. Rostov-on-Don: SFU.

Messner E. E. (2004) World myatezhevoyna. Zhukovsky, Moscow: “Kuchkovo pole”. (In Russ.)

Mitrokhin N. (2006) The Russian Orthodox Church: the current state and urgent problems. 2 ed. Moscow: New Literary surveyed- set. (In Russ.)

Neretina S. S. (2012) Resurrection of political philosophy and political deition. Paris uprising 1356–1358 years. Moscow: Golos. (In Russ.)

Orthodoxy as the factor of formation of Russian statehood and culture anthology (2012). Originator, opening speech, comments., dictionary of concepts, terms and names by V. V. Fedorov, M. I. Shishova. Saint-Petersburg.: RkhGA.

Petrov M. K. (1996) Historical and philosophical studies. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Potseluyev S. P. (2015) Political paradialog. Political kontseptoloogy: metadistsiplinarnyh Research magazine. No. 4: 29–53. URL: http://politconcept.sfedu.ru/2015.4/03.pdf (accessed 15.03.2017). (In Russ.)

Sheynis V. L. (2014) Power and Law: Politics and the constitution in Russia in the XX–XX centuries. Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russ.)

Shits I. I. (1991) Diary “Great Change” (March 1928-August 1931). Paris: YMCA-PRESS. (In Russ.)

Shkaratan O. I. et al. 2009. Socio-economic inequality and its reproduction in modern Russia. Moscow: JSC “OLMA Media Group.” (In Russ.)

Sorokin P. A. (2004) Sociology revolutions. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Tolstova V. I. (2012) Russian era of change. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (2007) Theocracy: phantom or reality? Moscow: Academia. (In Russ.)

Content No 7, 2017