Strategies of metatheorizing in sociology


Dudina V.I.

Cand.Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor, St. Petersburg State University, Faculty of Sociology, St. Petersburg, Russia viktoria_dudina@mail.ru

DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517120029
ID of the Article: 6969


For citation:

Dudina V.I. Strategies of metatheorizing in sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2017. No 12. P. 10-19




Abstract

In the article three strategies of metatheorizing are distinguished: integrative, evolutionary and perspectivist metatheorizing. The specific features of these strategies are considered. «Integrative metatheorizing» is aimed at identification of common theoretical logic, standardization of the language of description and/or on the development of an integrated theory. The goal of «evolutionary metatheorizing» is to understand the trends and prospects of sociology in changing social and intellectual context. This strategy is characterized by the identification of stages, phases, shifts, displacements in sociological knowledge, and by the mapping of past achievements in terms of determining the current state and prospects of the discipline. «Perspectivist metatheorizing» is aimed at identification of relatively hermetic and independent configurations, characterized by internal consistency – paradigms, research programs, models of explanation, etc. The proposed classification treats strategies of metatheorizing in terms of solving the problem of disciplinary fragmentation. Integrative metatheorizing is based on the search for the common or integrated social theory, evolutionary metatheorizing recognizes the possibility of creating common theory in the future, perspectivist metatheorizing treats the diversity of sociological knowledge as a natural state and denies assessing the sociological knowledge by universal criteria. The diversity of sociological methods and theories should be accompanied by the variety of models of the knowledge justification, because sociological knowledge performs many functions in different social settings.


Keywords
metatheory; metatheorizing; social theory; sociological research
References

Девятко И.Ф. Модели объяснения и логика социологического исследования. М.: РЦГО-TEMPUS / TASIS, 1996. [Devyatko I.F. (1996) Models of Explanation and Logic of Sociological Research. Moscow: RZGO-TEMPUS/TASIS. (In Russ.)].

Девятко И.Ф. Социологические теории деятельности и практической рациональности. М.: Аванти плюс, 2003. [Deviatko I.F. (2003) Sociological Theories of Activity and Practical Rationality. Moscow: Avanti plus. (In Russ.)].

Дудина В.И. Вымышленный кризис социологии и контуры новой эпистемологии // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 10. С. 13–21. [Dudina V.I. (2013) Fictitious Crisis of Sociology and a New Shape of Epistemology. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 13–21 (In Russ.)].

Дудина В.И. Эпистемические матрицы социологического знания. СПб.: Издательский дом СПбГУ, 2013. [Dudina V.I. (2013) Epistemic Matrices of Sociological Knowledge. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House. (In Russ.)].

Иванов Д.В. Эволюция социологии и эволюционное метатеоретизирование// Телескоп. 2013. № 4. C. 13–19. [Ivanov D.V. (2013) Evolution of Sociology and Evolutionary Metatheorizing. Teleskop [Telescope]. No. 4: 13–19. (In Russ.)].

Alexander J. (1982) Theoretical logic in sociology. Vol. 1. Positivism, Presupposition and Current Controversies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Alexander J., Giesen В., Smelser N. (eds) (1987) The Macro-Micro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Archer M. (1988) Culture and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Archer M. (1982) Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action. British Journal of Sociology. 1982. No. 33: 455–483.

Berger J., Wagner D.G., Zelditch M. (1992) A Working Strategy for Constructing Theories: State Organizing Processes. In: Metatheorizing. Ed. by G. Ritzer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 107–123.

Berger J., Wagner D.G., Zelditch M. (2014) Expectation States Theory: Growth, Opportunities and Challenges. In: Advances in Group Processes. Ed. by S. Thye, E. Lawler. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing: 19–55.

Berger J., Wagner D.G., Zelditch M. (1991) State Organizing Processes: A Metatheoretical Conception. In: Metatheorizing: A Coming of Age. Ed. by G. Ritzer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Berger J., Wagner D.G., Zelditch M. (1989) Theory Growth, Social Processes, and Metatheory. In: Theory- Building in Sociology. Ed. by J. Turner. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 19–42.

Berger J., Zelditch M. (eds) (1993) Theoretical research programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Blalock H.M. (1969) Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hal.

Burawoy M. (2005) For Public Sociology. American Sociological Review. No. 70: 4–28.

Burawoy M. (2007) Open the Social Science: to Whom and for What. Portuguese Journal of Social Science. No. 6 (3): 137–146.

Burawoy M. (2011) The last positivist. Contemporary Sociology. No. 40 (4): 396–404.

Collins R. (1988) The Micro Contribution to Macro Sociology. Sociological Theory. No. 6: 242–253.

Colomy P. (1991) Metatheorizing in a Postpositivist Frame. Sociological Perspectives. No. 34:269–286.

Dubin R. (1969) Theory Building. New York: The Free Press.

Eckberg D., Hill L. (1979) The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review. American Sociological Review. No. 44: 925–937.

Effrat A. (1972) Power to the Paradigms: An Editorial Introduction. Sociological Inquiry. No. 42: 3–33.

Eisenstadt S., Helle H. (eds) (1985) Macro-Sociological Theory: Perspectives on Sociological Theory. Vol. 1. London: Sage.

Friedrichs R.A. (1970) Sociology of Sociology. New York: The Free Press.

Gibbs J. (1972) Sociological Theory Construction. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press.

Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gouldner A. (1970) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.

Guba E.G. (1990) Foreword. In: The Paradigm Dialog. Ed. by E. Guba. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Knorr-Cetina K., Cicourel A.V. (eds) (1981) Advances in Social Theory: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. Boston and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Lincoln Y.S., Cuba E.G. (2000) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Handbook of qualitative research. Ed. by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln: 163–188.

Mullins N. (1973) Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.

Mullins N. (1971) The Art of Theory Construction and Use. New York: Harper and Row.

Reynolds P.A. (1971) Primer in Theory Construction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Ritzer G. (2001) Explorations in Social Theory: From Metatheorizing to Rationalization. London: Sage Publications.

Ritzer G. (1991a) Metatheorizing in Sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Ritzer G.(1990) Metetheorizing in Sociology. Sociological Forum. No. 5 (1):1–74.

Ritzer G. (1990b) Reflections on the Rise of Metatheorizing in Sociology. Sociological Perspectives. No. 34 (3): 237–248.

Ritzer G. (1988) Sociological Metatheory: Defending a Subfield by Delineating Its Parameters. Sociological Theory. No. 6:187–200.

Ritzer G. (1975) Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Ritzer G. (1981) Toward an Integrated Sociological Paradigm: The Search for an Exemplar and an Image of the Subject Matter. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Ritzer G., Smart B. (eds) (2001) Handbook of Social Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Skocpol T. (1987) The Dead End of Meta- theory. Contemporary Sociology. No.16: 10–12.

Stinchcombe A. (1968) Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Sztompka P. (2011) Another Sociological Utopia. Contemporary Sociology. No. 40 (4): 396–404.

Sztompka P. (2008) The Focus on Everyday Life: a New Turn in Sociology. European Review. No. 16 (1): 23–37.

Therborn G. (2000) At the Birth of Second Century Sociology: Times of Reflexivity, Spaces of Identity, and Nodes of Knowledge. British Journal of Sociology. No. 51 (1): 37–57.

Tiryakian E.A. (1979) The Significance of Schools in the Development of Sociology Contemporary Issues. In: Theory and Research. Ed. by W. Snizek, E.R. Fuhrman, and M.K. Miller. Westport CT: Greenwood Press: 211–223.

Turner J. (1991) Developing Cumulative and Practical Knowledge through Metatheorizing. Sociological Perspectives. No. 34: 249–268.

Turner J.H. (1990) The Misuse and Use of Metatheory. Sociological Forum. No. 5(1): 37–53.

Wagner D., Berger J. (1986) Programs, Theory, and Metatheory. American Journal of Sociology. No. 92: 168–182.

Wagner D. (2006) Theoretical Research Programs. In: Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Ed. by G. Ritzer. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell: 4976–4979.

Wallace W. (1971) The Logic of Science in Sociology. Chicago: Aldine.

Wallerstein I. (ed.) (1996) Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Wallerstein I. (1990) The End of the World as We Know It. Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.

Wiley N. (1988) The Micro-Macro Problem in Social Theory. Sociological Theory. No. 6: 254–261.

Wiley N. (1979) The Rise and Fall of Dominating Theories in American Sociology. In: Contemporary Issues in Theory and Research. Ed. by W. Snizek, E.R. Fuhrman, M.K. Miller. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press: 47–79.

Willer D. (1967) Scientific Sociology: Theory and Method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Zetterberg H. (1963) On Theory and Verification in Sociology. Totowa, New Jersey: Bedminster.

Zhao S. (1991) Metatheory, Metamethod, Meta-Data-Analysis: What, Why, and How? Sociological Perspectives. No. 34: 377–390.


Content No 12, 2017