Ethnosociology
from the frontier research field to a branch of sociology


Drobizheva L.M.

Dr. Sci. (His.), Chief Researcher, Head of the Center for the Study of Interethnic Relations, Institute of Sociology, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor-researcher, National Research University «Higher School of Economics», Moscow, Russia drobizheva@yandex.ru

DOI: 10.7868/S013216251806-001X
ID of the Article: 7211


For citation:

Drobizheva L.M. Ethnosociology: from the frontier research field to a branch of sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2018. No 6. P. 17-29




Abstract

The article considers main stages of development in ethnosociological studies. The first stage lasted from the late 1960s to the late 1980s. At this stage the studies of social structure of the contacting ethnic groups in the Union- and Autonomous republics dominated. Social aspects of culture and interethnic relations were considered in the context of social and professional groups. Large-scale interRepublican comparative studies were conducted. The second stage since the 1990s was related to the actualization of ethnicity in the country and to the expansion of research problems: the study of national movements, nationalisms, causes and consequences of interethnic conflicts, social and cultural distance and the impact of social and structural changes, social inequality in the society, the inflow of migrants, interethnic attitudes. The importance of expanding contacts with world sociology, increasing attention to research methodology and expanding constructivist approach to understanding identity is noted as well. The next stage since the 2000s was connected to the obvious movement of ethnosociology from the discipline at the intersection of sociology and ethnology toward the sociology. This is manifested in clarifying the subject of study and presenting it as a study of ethnically marked space, the disclosure of the object of study, taking into account the fact that ethnicity can be nominal and real, manifested both in the form of categories and network connections, associations and communities, understanding the flexibility of ethnicity and the desire to get away from the rigid “binding” of people to an ethnic group. The publications topics show that changes in subject and specification of an object of research proves that ethnosociology Acknowledgementsturns from the interdisciplinary discipline into a branch of sociology. The analysis of main directions of studies shows similarity of modern Russian ethnosociology to the Western sociology of the racial and ethnic relations. The difference is mainly in methods and terminology. The author suggests directions which demand further studying.


Keywords
ethnosociology; sociology of racial and ethnic relations; integration; civil and ethnic identity; inequalities; interethnic relations; interethnic conflicts; safety; adaptation and integration of migrants; methodology
References

Arutiunian Yu.V., Drobizheva L. M. (2014) Traversed Path and Issues of Contemporary Russian Ethnosociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 7: 102–112. (In Russ.)

Arutyunova E. M. (2018) Ethno-linguistic Problems and Prospects in Educational Sphere of the Russian Republics (the Case of Bashkortostan). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 4: 25–35. (In Russ.)

Arutyunyan Yu.V., Drobizheva L. M. (2008) Ethnosociology before the Challenges of Time. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 7: 88–92. (In Russ.)

Barth F. (2006) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Differences: Collected papers. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russ.)

Berger P., Lukman T. (1995) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: Medium. (In Russ.)

Bogatova O. A. (2017) Social Technologies of Republican and Russian Identity Management in Estimates of the Republic of Mordovia Population: Experience of Qualitative Sociological Research. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sociologiya. Politologiya [Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science]. Vol. 1. No. 1: 54–70. (In Russ.)

Bromley Yu.V. (1977) Towards the Peculiarities of Ethnographic Study of Modern Times. Sovetskaya etnografiya [Soviet Ethnography]. No. 1: 13–18. (In Russ.)

Chernysh M. F. (2016a) Factors of the Emergence and Reproduction of Interethnic Tension in the Theoretical Perspective POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No. 5: 25–36. (In Russ.)

Chernysh M. F. (2016b) Theoretical and Methodological Study of Ethnic Tension Causation. Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. No. 4: 25–41. (In Russ.)

Drobizheva L. M. (1996) Ethnosociology in the USSR and Post-Soviet Russia. In: Yadov V. A. (ed.) Sociology in Russia. Moscow: Izd-vo «Na Vorobyovyh»; IS RAN: 195–214. (In Russ.)

Drobizheva L. M. (2006) Methodological Problems of Ethnosociological Studies. Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. No. 3-4: 89–101. (In Russ.).

Fadeeva E. Yu. (2016) Heraldry as a Reflection of Ethnopolitical Processes. In: Drobizheva L. M. (ed.) Interethnic Consent as a Resource for the Consolidation of Russian Society. Moscow: IS RAN: 304–332. (In Russ.)

Epikhina Yu.B., Chernysh M. F. (eds) (2017) Social Factors of Interethnic Tension in Russia. Moscow: FNISTs RAN. (In Russ.)

Guboglo M. M. (2016) Ethnosociology: Native of Ethnography. In: Ostapenko L. V., Subbotina I. A. (eds) Ethnosociology Yesterday and Today. Moscow: IEA RAN: 45–71. (In Russ.)

Handelman D. (1977) The Organization of Ethnicity. Ethnic Groups. Vol. 1: 187–200.

Interview with Professor Thomas Luckmann (2002). Zhurnal sotsiologii i social’noj antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. V. No. 4: 5–14. (In Russ.).

Jenkins R. (1997) Rethinking Ethnicity. Arguments and Explorations. London: SAGE Publications.

Kivisto P. (2016) We Really Are All Multiculturalists Now. Zhurnal sotsiologii i social’noj antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. XIX. No. 2: 19–45. (In Russ.).

Klitsenko M. V. (2015) Interethnic Integration Problems in Khabarovsk. Uchenye zametki TOGU [Scientists notes PNU]. Vol. 6. No. 1: 208–212. URL: http://pnu.edu.ru/media/ejournal/articles-2015/TGU_6_34.pdf (accessed 10.02.2018). (In Russ.)

Malikova N. R. (2016) Innovative Potential of Sociology. In: Ostapenko L. V., Subbotina I. A. (eds) Ethnosociology Yesterday and Today. Moscow: IEA RAN: 72–76. (In Russ.)

Ostapenko L. V., Subbotina I. A. (eds) (2016) Ethnosociology Yesterday and Today. Moscow: IEA RAN. (In Russ.)

Popkov Yu.V. (2015) National Politics in Russia: Targets and Regional Models. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 39–44. (In Russ.)

Radaev V. V., Shkaratan O. I. (1996) Social Stratification. Moscow: Aspect-Press. (In Russ.)

Rezaev A. V., Tregubova N. D. (2015) Inequality and Social Exclusion in Everyday Social Intercourse: Theoretical Frames and Implications for Social Policy. Zhurnal issledovanij sotsial’noj politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies]. Vol. 13. No. 2: 181–194. (In Russ.)

Rezaev A. V., Zhikharevich D. M. (2016) In Search of Trust: Apostolis Papakostas’ Comparative-historical Sociology of the Public Sphere. In: Papakostas A. Civilizing the Public Sphere: Distrust, Trust, and Corruption. Moscow: WCIOM: 7–18. (In Russ.)

Shadzhe A. Yu. (2016) National Policy: Prospects of Research. Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii [Humanitarians of the South of Russia]. Vol. 22. No. 6: 178–185. (In Russ.)

Suschii S. Ja. (2017) Representatives of the Caucasian Peoples in Socio-professional Status Communities of the South of Russia: Trends of Post-soviet Period. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 3–16. (In Russ.)

Wiener B. E., Divisenko K. S. Russian Sociology of Ethnic Relations: Boundaries, Research Areas, and Research Groupings. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologij [Sociology of Science & Technology]. Vol. 6. No. 4: 177–196. (In Russ.)


Content No 6, 2018