Paradigms of Social Knowledge and Validation in Architecture


Kiyanenko K.V.

Dr. Sci. (Arch.), Prof., Department of Architecture and Urban Design, Vologda State University, Vologda, Russia kiyanenko_k@yahoo.com

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250001956-4
ID of the Article: 7332


For citation:

Kiyanenko K.V. Paradigms of Social Knowledge and Validation in Architecture. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2018. No 9. P. 30-39




Abstract

On the basis of conceptual and terminological analysis of texts in architecture and architectural sociology the current trend of considering social knowledge of architects as an object of sociology of architecture is argued to be reasonable. The author’s concept of ‘paradigms of social and architectural knowledge’ as independent platforms that represent and explain structure of the architect’s understanding of the social and as a set of social models is offered. Among them are functionalist, interactionist, consumerist, environmentalist, and phenomenological paradigms. The differences in treating basic notions of “function”, “activity”, “interaction”, “need” in architecture and sociology are stressed. The basic social models, which enter into each of the paradigms, are characterized, incl.: models of man as a dweller and an architect’s client, models of life and its social content, models of architecture as a social product, and as a social practice. Criticism which sociology focuses on the contents of paradigms is given. The concept is used to systematize and describe the approaches to social validation/justification of architectural solutions. The conclusion is made about the prospects of using the concept to solve other research problems in sociology of architecture.


Keywords
architectural sociology; paradigms of social knowledge in architecture; social validation in architecture

References

Bauman Z. (2008) City of fears, city of hopes. Logos. No. 3: 24–53. (In Russ.)

Bourdieu P. (1993) Sociology of politics. Transl. from Fr. N. A. Shmatko. Moscow: Socio-Logos. (In Russ.)

Delits H. (2018) Architectural Modes of Collective Existence: Architectural Sociology as a Comparative Social Theory. Cultural Sociology. Vol. 12(1): 37–57.

Delitz H. (2008) Architecture in social dimension. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 10: 113–121. (In Russ.)

Frampton K. (1996) On Reading Heidegger. In: Theorizing a New Agenda For Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory 1965–1995. Ed. by K. Nesbitte. New York: Princeton Architectural Press: 442–446.

Glazychev V. L. (1974) Problems of theory of Soviet architecture. In: Socio-Functional Problems of Soviet Architecture. Collect. of scientif. works. Moscow: TSNIITIA. (In Russ.)

Glazychev V. L. (1978) Sociology of architecture – what and what for. Zodchestvo [Architecture]. No. 2(21): 25–29. (In Russ.)

Kartashova K. K. (2013) Housing evolution under modern conditions. Promishlennoe I grazhdanskoe stroitelstvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering]. No. 12: 56–59. (In Russ.)

Kiyanenko K. V. (2005) Architecture and social modelling of housing: Doctoral Dissertation. Vologda. (In Russ.)

Kiyanenko K. V. (2010) Issues of Social Reasoning in Architectural Research in the USA. In: Social Validation for the Strategies of Urban, Regional and Corporate Development: Research Problems And Methods. Proceedings of IX Dridze readings. Moscow: IS RAS: 133–142. (In Russ.)

Kiyanenko K. V. (2012) Sociology and social theory of architecture: the interdisciplinary issues. In: Sociology and Society: Global Challenges and Regional Development: Materials of IV recurrent All-Russian sociological congress. Moscow: RSS: 7412–7421. 1CD ROM. (In Russ.)

Le Corbusier Ch. (1977) Three Forms of Settling. Athens Charter. Transl. from Fr. K. T. Topuridze (ed.). Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

Muleev E. Yu. (2014) Architecture and sociology in the USSR: practice of interaction. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 12: 111–120. (In Russ.)

Nazarova M. P. (2011) Sociology of architecture and its role in the developing of architectural space of the modern city. Sotsiologiya goroda [Urban Sociology]. No. 3: 10–14. (In Russ.)

Pomorov S. B., Udodenko A. A. (2013) The problem of interaction between architecture and sociology as a means of modeling urban systems and elements. Polzunovskiy vestnik [Polzunov’s Herald]. No. 4–1: 219–221. (In Russ.)

Priadko I. P. (2015) Sociology of urban space and architecture: Lecture notes for undergraduate full-time students in Architecture and Urban Planning programs. Moscow: MSCU. (In Russ.)

Rappaport A. G. (2018) Sociology of architecture. In: The Tower and the Labyrinth. URL: http://papardes.blogspot. ru/#!/2017/10/blog-post_19.html (accessed 03.03.18). (In Russ.)

Sanoff H. (2000) Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Seamon D. (2018) Architecture and Phenomenology. In: The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Architectural History. Ed. by Duanfang Lu. [In Press].

Vartofskiy M. (1988) Models. Representation and scientific understanding. Transl. from Engl. I. B. Novak, V. N. Sadovskiy (eds). Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

Vilkovskiy M. B. (2010) Sociology of Architecture. Moscow: Russkiy Avangard. (In Russ.)

Yanitskiy O. N. (2009) Dossier of the environmentalist. Essays on the intellectual biography. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Yargina Z. N., Khachatriants K. K. (1990) The Social Foundations of Architectural Design. Moscow: Stroyizdat. (In Russ.)

Zeisel J. (2006) Inquiry by Design: Environment/ Behavior/ Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning. New York; London: W. W. Norton & Company.

Zinchenko A. P. (1981) Need as a basis for the process of design of subject and spatial environment. In: Man and Environment: psychological aspects. Abstracts of a conference. Lohusalu, Jan. 1981. Tallinn: EBSP USSR: 60–63. (In Russ.)

Content No 9, 2018