Jurgen Habermas on the Powers of Social Communication:
the 90th Anniversary of the German Sociologist


Golovin N.A.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Department of theory and history of sociology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia n.golovin@spbu.ru

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005478-8
ID of the Article: 7692


The article is prepared with the support of The Centre for German and European Studies, St. Petersburg State University – Bielefeld University, Grant No. 1/15/2019.


For citation:

Golovin N.A. Jurgen Habermas on the Powers of Social Communication: the 90th Anniversary of the German Sociologist. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 6. P. 15-25




Abstract

The article examines the influence of life course and historical time on the work of the German philosopher and sociologist Jürgen Habermas. Their connection to philosophical bases of his theory of communicative action and ethics of discourse is traced. The differences in solving the problem of the subject of history in the critical theory of Habermas, society and in the original version of this theory by M. Horkheimer and T.W. Adorno are reviewed. The socio-historical grounds and consequences for the development of discourse ethics are analyzed. Discussed are also differences in the discourse ethics of J. Habermas and K.-O. Apel, Habermas controversy with the theorist of social systems N. Luhmann on philosophical problems of the theory of society.


Keywords
J. Habermas; N. Luhmann; critical theory of society; ethics of discourse; theory of social systems; history of social thought

References

Archimedes und wir: Interviews (Internationaler Merve Diskurs). (1987) D. Baecker, G. Stanitzek (eds). Berlin: Merve: 125–155.

Dеnеzhkin А.V. (1995) J. Habermas’ «Facticity and Significance»: New Studies in Law Theory and Democratic State-of-law. In: Habermas J. Democracy. Reason. Morality. Moscow Lectures and Interviews. Мoscow: KAMI; Academia: 181–206. (In Russ.)

Habermas J. (1995) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (In Germ.)

Habermas J. (2000) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Habermas J. (2005) Modern – Project in Progress. In: Habermas J. Political Works. Мoscow: Praxis: 7–31. (In Russ.)

Habermas J. (2007) Cognition and Interest. In: Habermas J. Technique and Science as «Ideology». Мoscow: Praxis: 167–191. (In Russ.)

Habermas J. (2008) Normative Content of Modernity. In: Habermas J. Philosophical Discourse on Modernity. Мoscow: Ves’ mir: 347–394. (In Russ.)

Habermas J. (2011a) Public Space and Political Publicity. Biographical Roots of Two Mental Motives. In: Habermas J. Between Naturalism and Religion. Philosophical Articles. Мoscow: Ves’ Mir: 15–25. (In Russ.)

Habermas J. (2011b) From Pictures of the World to the Vital World. Мoscow: Idea-Press. (In Russ.)

Habermas J. (2016) Structural Change in the Public Sphere: Research on the Category of Bourgeois Society: with a Preface to the Reprint of 1990. Мoscow: Ves’ mir. (In Russ.)

Habermas J., Luhmann N. (1971) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (In Germ.)

Hobsbawm E. (2004) The Epoch of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. Мoscow: Nezavisimaya gazeta. (In Russ.)

Horkheimer M. (1980) Traditionelle und kritische Theorie. In: Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. 1937. Jg. 6. Reprint 1980. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH & Co. KG: 274–275. (In Germ.)

Horkheimer М., Аdorno Т. (1997) The Dialectic of the Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Мoscow; St. Petersburg: Mediun; Yuventa. (In Russ.)

Lapaeva V.V. The Political and Legal Concept of J. Habermas (from the Standpoint of Libertarian Legal Thinking). URL: http://igpran.ru/public/publiconsite/Lapaeva.Polit_prav_konc_Xabermasa.pdf (accessed 11.04.2019). (In Russ.)

Lucasz G. (2003) History and Class Consciousness: Studies on the Marxist Dialectic. Мoscow: LogosАltera. (In Russ.)

Luhmann N. (1994) The Concept of Society. In: Problems of Theoretical Sociology. Ed. by A.O. Boronoev. Iss. 1. St. Petersburg: SPbGU: 25–42. (In Russ.)

Luhmann N. (2011) Society of Society. Books 4, 5. Moscow: Logos. (in Russ.)

Luhmann N. (2007) Social Systems. Sketch of a General Theory. St. Petersburg: Nаukа, 2007. (In Russ.)

Müller-Doohm S. (2014) Jürgen Habermas. Eine Biographie. Berlin: Suhrkamp. 2014. (In Germ.)

Nithammer L., Shcerbakova I. (2012) Interview with the Interviewer. Conversation with L. Niethammer. In: Niethammer L. Questions for German History. Мoscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo: 493–531. (In Russ.)

Plenkov О.Yu. (2014) The Origins of Modernity: the Dynamics And Logic of the Development of the West in Modern Times. St. Petersburg: Voskhod. (In Russ.)

Skvortsova Т.G. (2010) On the Definition of the Concept of Discourse. In: Modern Logic: Problems of Theory and History. St. Petersburg: SPbGU: 372–373. (In Russ.)

Sorokin P.А. (2017) Sociology and Ethics. Naslediye [Heritage]. No. 2(11): 146–157. (In Russ.)

Vogel H.-J. (2007) Der zwanglose Zwang des besseren Arguments. Laudatio auf Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurter Hefte. No. 1–2: 88–90.

West D. (2015) Continental Philosophy: an Introduction. Мoscow: Delo; RANEPA. (In Russ.)

Content No 6, 2019