The Sociocultural Phenomenon of Self-dependence in Russian Citizens' Work in an International Comparison


Temnitskiy A.L.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., Sociological Department, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of MFA of Russia, Senior Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia taleksandr@list.ru

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005480-1
ID of the Article: 7694


For citation:

Temnitskiy A.L. The Sociocultural Phenomenon of Self-dependence in Russian Citizens' Work in an International Comparison. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 6. P. 37-49




Abstract

The relevance of workers’ independence (regarding employees in modern Russia) is being substantiated in this article. Presence and value of independence in Russian employees’ work is being determined in comparison to the same index of their colleagues from Europe and Southeastern countries on the basis of data analysis of European Social Survey (ESS, 2006 & 2016) and international studies of attitude to work conducted within ISSP in 2005 and 2015. Sociocultural approach is used for complex analysis of the phenomenon of work independence. On its basis the indicators of independence as a value, belonging, as something that is limited and indifferent are distinguished. It is shown in the article that Russian workers are outsiders in the aspect of independence’s value and its amount in their work, they are also indifferent towards it in comparison to workers from all the other countries except Japan. Despite the fact that Russian and Japanese workers show almost the same amount of independence in their work, the tendency of approaching to role independence in European corporate culture is more typical for Russians. The referent type of independence for Russian workers is the type in which this tendency is the most valuable and integrated into their work.


Keywords
work independence; independence as a value and belonging; lack of independence; indifference towards independence; sociocultural approach; international comparative researches; employees

References

Andreenkova A.V. (2014) Comparative Intercountry Researches in Social Sciences: Theory, Methodology, Practice. Moscow: New chronograph. (In Russ.)

Akhiezer A.S. (1998) Russia: a Critique of Historical Experience. Vol. 2. Theory and Methodology. Vocabulary. Novosibirsk: Sibirskij khronograf. (In Russ.)

Gorshkov M.K., Sedova N.N. (2015) «Self-sufficient Russians» and Their Life Priorities. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 4–16. (In Russ.)

Japanese Phenomenon. (1996) Moscow: RIO Instituta Vostokovedeniya RAN. (In Russ.)

Karandashev V.N. (2004) Schwarz’s Method for Studying Personality Values: Concept and Methodological Guide. Saint-Petersburg: Rech’. (In Russ.)

Korel L.V., Kombarov V.Yu. (2012) The Subject of Labor in an Industrial Enterprise (the Experience of a Sociological Study of Engineering and Technical Workers). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 3–10. (In Russ.)

Lapin N.I. (2011) Socio-cultural Factors of Russian Stagnation and Modernization. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 3–18. (In Russ.)

Magun V., Rudnev M. (2008) Vital Values of the Russian Population: Similarities and Differences in Comparison with Other European Countries. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii [Bulletin of Public Opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions]. No. 1: 33–58. (In Russ.)

Maslow A. (2016) Motivation and Personality. 3rd ed. Saint-Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)

Peters T., Waterman R. (1986) In Search of Effective Governance. Moscow: Economy. (In Russ.)

Popova I.P. (2008) Autonomy at Work: Decade Trends. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. No. 4: 135–151. (In Russ.)

Shabanova M.A. (2001) Mass Adaptation Strategies and Perspectives of Institutional Transformations. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. No. 3: 78–104.

Temnitskiy A.L. (2007) The Category of «Socioculture» Research Potential. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie [Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling]. No. 24: 81–101. (In Russ.)

Temnitskiy A.L. (2011) Independence in Work as a Factor in the Formation of the Subjectivity of Workers in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 35–42. (In Russ.)

Temnitskiy A.L. (2015) Paternalistic Foundations of the Russian Civilization in the Sphere of Labor. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social'naya praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. No. 2(10): 51–69. (In Russ.)

Schwartz S.H. (1992) Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Ed. by M. Zanna. New York: Academic Press. Vol. 25: 1–65.

Content No 6, 2019