Sociologist in the Context of Armed Conflict in Donbass


Yakovenko А.V.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Department of Sociology, Lugansk National University named after Vladimir Dahl, Lugansk, Ukraine daoav@rambler.ru

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005800-3
ID of the Article: 7743


For citation:

Yakovenko А.V. Sociologist in the Context of Armed Conflict in Donbass. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 7. P. 143-151




Abstract

Preservation, and in some cases expansion, of armed conflict zones in the world in general and in the post-Soviet territory in particular, confirms relevance of a thorough analysis of the possibilities to conduct qualified sociological research in military confrontation areas. The article provides a summary of a number of the most typical difficulties arising in the preparation of a sample set, establishing a constructive frank dialogue with the respondents. The situation in Donbas, so author, has precedence, both in terms of its vast territory of the conflict, and in the number of people living in the social atmosphere of the war. Special attention is paid to the problem of an unbiased assessment of what is happening. There are pressures on the correctness of academic analysis and research findings, ideologically rich environment, as well as the feasibility of legal responsibility for the use of taboo terms in scholarly texts. Author argues for importance of specialized training of sociologists to work in extreme conditions. It is proposed to intensify initiatives to specify legal base, primarily in terms of international law to ensure the status of sociologists’ activities in zones of military conflicts, as well as areas of man-made and natural disasters. Sociological research should be considered one of the procedures to normalize social relations and establish civilized dialogue.


Keywords
sociological research; extreme sociology; social atmosphere; security; ideology; theorizing

References

Batygin G.S. (2008) Lectures on the Methodology of Sociological Research: A textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow: RUDN. (In Russ.)

Interview with S.R. Khaykin. (2004) «Extreme Sociology». Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 1(69): 46–49. (In Russ.)

Obraztsov I.V. (2014) The Process of Institutionalization of Military Sociology in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 135–145. (In Russ.)

Regarding Public Discussion around the Publication of the Round Table Materials «Lugansk: Hot Summer 2014» and Letters from the Minister of Education and Science Kvit S.M. to the President of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Paton B.E. Editorial Board Commentary. (2015) Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing [Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing]. No. 4: 214–216. (In Russ.)

Social Consequences of the Chernobyl Disaster (Results of 1986–1995 Sociological Studies). (1996) Respons. ed. by V. Vorona, E. Golovakha, Yu. Saenko. Kharkiv: Folio. (In Ukr.)

Stouffer S.A., Suchman E.A. (eds) (1949) The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life (Studies in Social Psychology in World War II). Oxford, UK: Princeton Univ. Press.

Toschenko Zh.T. (2015) Sociology of Life as a Theoretical Concept. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 106–116. (In Russ.)

Content No 7, 2019