«Life-cycle Stage» as a Determinant of Personal Subjective Wellbeing


Kuchenkova A.V.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior lecturer, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia a.kuchenkova@rggu.ru

Tatarova G.G.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia tatarova-gg@rambler.ru

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006135-1
ID of the Article: 7771


For citation:

Kuchenkova A.V. , Tatarova G.G. «Life-cycle Stage» as a Determinant of Personal Subjective Wellbeing. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 8. P. 30-43




Abstract

The article substantiates a dominant role of «life-cycle stage» for examining specificity of personal subjective wellbeing/social wellbeing. For this purpose, a procedure of secondary conceptualization of two surveys data (European Social Survey (2012) and Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey – HSE (2017)) is suggested. This procedure includes a distinction of different types of interconnections between indicators of subjective wellbeing / ill-being; construction of index «lifecycle stage»; development of a data analysis logical scheme. General subjective wellbeing is measured by «logical» index based on life satisfaction and happiness. Specific subjective wellbeing is measured by indicators and indices, which are derived from factorization of variables, representing subjective wellbeing in life domains. The index «life-cycle stage» is based on age, marital status, children and their age or place of living. Data analysis includes identification of groups, which are homogeneous in terms of the life-cycle stage; examination of interconnection between general and specific subjective well-being by parallel use of Cramer’s coefficient and logical-combinatorial method (JSM-method). Comparison of specificity of this interconnection for selected groups allows conclusions about the dominant role of life-cycle stage for personal subjective well-being.


Keywords
life-cycle stage; personal subjective well-being; general subjective well-being; specific subjective well-being; interconnection of indicators; JSM-method; Cramer’s coefficient

References

Andreenkova N.V. (2010) Comparative Analysis of Life Satisfaction and Its Determinants. Monitoring obshestvennogo mneniya [Monitoring of Public Opinion]. No. 5(99): 189–215. (In Russ.)

Blanchflower D., Oswald A. (2008) Is Well-being U-shaped over the Life Cycle? Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 66. No. 8: 1733–1749.

Deaton A. (2008) Income, Health, and Well-being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 22. No. 2: 53–72. DOI: 10.1257/jep.22.2.53.

Easterlin R. (2006) Life Cycle Happiness and Its Sources: Intersections of Psychology, Economics and Demography. Journal of Economic Psychology. No. 27: 463–482. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2006.05.002.

Finn V.K. (ed.) (2009) Automatic Hypotheses Generation in Intelligent Systems. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom «Librokom». (In Russ.)

Frijters P., Beatton T. (2012) The Mystery of the U-shaped Relationship between Happiness and Age. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Vol. 82. No. 2–3: 525–542. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.008.

George L.K., Okun M.A., Landerman R. (1985) Age as a Moderator of the Determinants of Life Satisfaction. Research on Aging. Vol. 7. No. 2: 209–233.

Gurko T.A. (2018) Well-being of Men and Women of Different Marital Status: Russia in the International Context. Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 24. No. 1: 73–94. DOI: 10.19181/ socjour.2018.24.1.5714. (In Russ.)

Heller D., Watson D., Hies R. (2004) The Role of Person versus Situation in Life Satisfaction: A Critical Examination. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 130. No. 4: 574–600. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.574.

Huppert F.A., So T.T.C. (2013) Flourishing across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 110. Iss. 3: 837–861. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7.

Kassenboehmer S.C., Haisken-DeNew J.P. (2012) Heresy or Enlightenment? The Well-being Age U-shape Effect Is Flat. Economics Letters. Vol. 117. Iss. 1: 235–238.

Klimova S.G., Mikheyenkova M.A. (2017) Possibilities of the JSM-Method for Creating Sociological Hypotheses (Using As an Example the Analysis of Political Participation). Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 23. No. 3: 80–101. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2017.23.3.5365. (In Russ.)

Kozyreva P.M., Nizamova A.E., Smirnov A.I. (2015) Happiness and Its Determinants. Part I. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 120–132. (In Russ.)

Kuchenkova A.V., Tatarova G.G. (2013) A Strategy for Using Logical-Combinatorial Methods in Procedures of Typological Analysis. Sotsiologiya: metodologija, metodi, matematicheskoe modelirovanie [Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling]. No. 36: 7–35. (In Russ.)

Luhmann M., Hofmann W., Eid M., Lucas R.E. (2012) Subjective Well-being and Adaptation to Life Events: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 102. No. 3: 592–615.

Meshcherkina E.J. (2002) The Life Course and Biography: the Continuity of Sociological Categories (Analysis of Foreign Concepts). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 61–67. (In Russ.)

Monusova G.A. (2012) Subjective Well-being and Age: Russia in the Context of International Comparisons. In: XII International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development. Vol. 3. Moscow: HSE: 98–109. (In Russ.)

O’Rand A.M., Krecker M.L. (1990) Concepts of the Life Cycle: Their History, Meanings, and Uses in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology. No. 16: 241–262.

Rodionova L.A. (2015) Age Characteristics of the Happy Life in Russia and Europe: The Econometric Approach. Prikladnaya econometrica [Applied Econometrics]. No. 40(4): 64–83. (In Russ.)

Semenova V.V. (2009) Social Dynamics of Generations: Problem and Reality. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Siedlecki K.L., Tucker-Drob E.M., Oishi Sh., Salthouse T.A. (2008) Life Satisfaction across Adulthood: Different Determinants at Different Ages? The Journal of Positive Psychology. Vol. 3. No. 3: 153–164.

Tatarova G.G., Kuchenkova A.V. (2016a) Indicators of Subjective Well-being as Characteristics for Typology Building. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 21–32. (In Russ.)

Tatarova G.G. Kuchenkova A.V. (2016b) Life-cycle Stage: Heuristic Potential for the Study of Subjective Well-being. In: Mansurov V.A. (ed.) Sociology and Society: Social Inequality and Social Justice (Yekaterinburg, 19–21 October 2016). Materials of the V all-Russian sociological Congress. Moscow: Rossijskoe obshchstvo sotsiologov: 8476–8491. (In Russ.)

Ulloa B.F.L., Møller V., Sousa-Poza A. (2013) How Does Subjective Well-being Evolve with Age? A Literature Review. Journal of Population Ageing. Vol. 6. Iss. 3: 227–246.

Van Landeghem B. (2012) A Test for Convexity of Human Well-being over the Lifecycle: Longitudinal Evidence from a 20-year Panel. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 81. No. 2: 571–585. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.001.

Voronin G.L., Zakharov V.Y., Kozyreva P.M. (2016) «Who Lives Well in Russia?» 1994–2013 Monitoring Survey. Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 22. No. 1: 26–53. DOI: 10.19181/ socjour.2016.22.1.3918. (In Russ.)

Content No 8, 2019