The Precariat Phenomenon:
Theoretical and Methodological Premises of its Study


Toshchenko Zh.T.

Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director and Head of the Department of Theory and History of Sociology, Russian State University for the Humanities; Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia zhantosch@mail.ru

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006669-8
ID of the Article: 7812


This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 18-18-00024


For citation:

Toshchenko Zh.T. The Precariat Phenomenon: Theoretical and Methodological Premises of its Study. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 9. P. 51-63




Abstract

The article discusses theoretical, methodological foundations of the precariat, understandings of this phenomenon in Russian and foreign literature, reasons for its appearance in the modern history. The initial positions of the preparation of the first special study of the precariat in the Russia are described, the methodological grounds for its implementation are revealed: the definition of the social problem in the sphere of labor relations, the formulation of the hypotheses of the study,the substantiation of the research model associated with the definition of the structure (composition) of the precariat, its representation in various spheres of society. Special consideration was given to the methodological tools of its study – sampling, survey methods, justification of methods of analysis of empirical information. Based on the data of an all-Russian study, the main and special features of the precariat were identified, its place and relationship with other social groups and primarily with the middle classes were shown. A debatable question is discussed – whether the precariat can be called a class and what are its main criteria in this case. Assumptions are made about its role in the course of fundamental social changes in the economy and politics, social consequences of its existence. An attempt was made to determine its role in defending its own interests, as well as the prospects for its further development and functioning.


Keywords
theory; methodology; precariat; social structure; employment; labour relationship; social consequences

References

Ashin G.K., Okhotsky V.V. (2000) Elitology, History, Theory, Modernity. Moscow: MGIMO. (In Russ.)

Biriukov A.A. (2015) Emergence of Precariat or Return of Proletariat? (Analysing «The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class» by G. Standing). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 158–162. (In Russ.)

Bobkov V.N. (ed.) (2018) Unstable Employment in the Russian Federation: Status and Trends of Decrease. Moscow: REU im. G.V. Plekhanova. (In Russ.)

Bourdieu P. (1998) Precariousness is Everywhere Nowadays. In: Against-Fires. Paris: Raisons d'agir: 96–102. (In Fr.)

Djilas M. (1961) The New Class. New York: Frederik A. Preger. (In Russ.)

Fedchenko A.A., Kolesnikova O.A., Dashkova E.S., Dorokhova N. (1916) Informal Employment: Theoretical Foundations, Research, Forecast. Voronezh: Voronezhskiy TsNTI – filial FGBU «REA» Minenergo Rossii. (In Russ.)

Florida R. (2007) Creative Class: People Who Change the Future. Moscow: ID «Klassika-XXI». (In Russ.)

Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2006) Political Elites of Russia: Milestones of Historical Evolution. Moscow: ROSSPEHN. (In Russ.)

Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. (2015) Precariat as a New Phenomenon in the Modern Social Structure. In: Golenkova Z.T. (ed.) Hired Worker in Modern Russia. Moscow: Novyy Khronograf: 121–138. (In Russ.)

Gorshkov M.K., Tikhonova N.E. (eds) (2016) Middle Class in Modern Russia. Years of Research Experience. Moscow: Ves' mir. (In Russ.)

Gorz A. (1982) Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay on Post-Industrial Socialism. London: Pluto Press.

Hardt M., Negri A. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hutington S.F. (2003) Third Wave. Democracy in the Assessment of the Twentieth Century. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

lyin V. I. (2000) Social Inequality. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii. (In Russ.)

Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2012) Informal Employment in Russia: What do Alternative Definitions Say? Moscow: VShE. (In Russ.)

Khartchenko V.S. (2014) Way of Life of Russian Free-lancers – a Sociological Analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 54–63. (In Russ.)

Kordonsky S.G. (2008) Class Structure of Post-Soviet Russia. Moscow: Fond «Obshchestvennoe mnenie». (In Russ.)

Kozina I.M. (2013) Employees of Borrowed Labor. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 18–31. (In Russ.)

Lenin V.I. (1970) The Great Start. In: Lenin V.I. The Complete Works. Vol. 39. Мoscow: Politizdat: 1–29. (In Russ.)

Nemirovskiy V.G. (2017) Justice Concept in the Context of the Estate Social Structure of Contemporary Russian Society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 40–47. (In Russ.)

Pink D. (2001) Free Agent Nation: How America’s New Independent Workers Are Transforming the Way We Live. New York: Warner Books.

Ponedelkov A.V. (1995) Elite (Political and Administrative Elite: Problems of Methodology, Sociology, Culture). Rostov on Don: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh. (In Russ.)

Rybakovsky L.L. (2017) Functions and Consequences of Migration Processes. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 56–63. (In Russ.)

Seymor R. (2012) We are All Precarious – On the Concept of the «Precariat» and its Misuses. New Left Project. 10 February. URL: https://www.coursehero.com/file/15770412/Seymour-R-We-Are-AllPrecarious-On-the-Concept-of-the-Precariat-and-its-Misuses/ (accessed 01.04.2019).

Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskiy V.V., Gasiukova E.N. (2015) Precariat: Theory and Empirical Analysis (polls in Russia, 1994–2013 data). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 99–110. (In Russ.)

Standing G. (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Strebkov D.O., Shevchuk A.V. (2017) Work Values of Self-employment and Organization Employment. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 81–93. (In Russ.)

Tikhonova N.E. (2014) The Social Structure of Society. Moscow: Novyy khronograf. (In Russ.)

Toffler A. (2001) Metamorphosis of Power. Knowledge, Wealth and Power on the Threshold of the XXI Century. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)

Toschenko Zh.T. (2018) Precariat: from Protoclass to a New Class. M.: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (ed.) (2016) The Life World of Russians: 25 Years Later (late 1980s – mid 2010s). Moscow: TsSPiM. (In Russ.)

Volkov Yu.G. (2011) Creativity: a Historical Breakthrough in Russia. Moscow: Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoe znanie. (In Russ.)

Voslensky M.S. (1991) Nomenclature. The Ruling Class of the Soviet Union. Moscow: MP «Oktyabr'» – «Sovetskaya Rossiya». (In Russ.)

Wright E.O. (2005) Approach to Class Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Content No 9, 2019