Modernization Syndrome and Trust: Interrelation in the Aspect of Intergenerational Characteristics

Modernization Syndrome and Trust:
Interrelation in the Aspect of Intergenerational Characteristics


Burko V.A.

Cand. Sci (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Sociology and Political Science, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia. victor-burko@yandex.ru

Vasserman Y.M.

Cand. Sci (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Sociology and Political Science, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia. yuriyvasserman@gmail.com

ID of the Article: 9036


This work is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research project No. 18-011-00548.


For citation:

Burko V.A., Vasserman Y.M. Modernization Syndrome and Trust: Interrelation in the Aspect of Intergenerational Characteristics. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2022. No 3. P. 52-63




Abstract

During the implementation of the RFBR grant on the topic “Intergenerational dynamics of culture: territorial aspect”, the authors tried to assess the relationship between two sociological indicators: the modernization syndrome and trust (generalized, institutional, personal, group). At the same time, the operationalization of the modernization syndrome is the original development by one of the article authors. The information base of the study was a survey of 2,400 respondents of the Perm Territory, conducted on a representative sample in late 2019 – early 2020. The results of study give grounds to assume that the regional society is differentiated into groups with different levels of cultural modernization. A comparative assessment of intergenerational differences in the indicators of social behavior that we proposed revealed a multidirectionality of their relationship depending on the type of institution or social group in relation to which the level of trust is assessed. Generalized trust weakly depends on respondents belonging to a particular generation. At the same time, personal trust increases from generation to generation. The conducted research has demonstrated the existence of differentiation of society in terms of the modernization level of culture and its connection with different types of trust. The nature of these links is different for different types of trust. The indicator of cultural modernization shows its increase in each subsequent generation. The modernization syndrome has the greatest impact on generalized and personal trust, and its impact on the level of institutional trust depends on the object of trust. At the same time, in the future, the sensitivity of the scale measuring the generalized trust level should be increased, which will allow researchers to more accurately describe the nature of the relationship of this type of trust with the level of cultural modernization. The connection between the intergenerational dynamics of culture and different types of trust revealed in the study allows us to expect different rates of increase in the levels of trust depending on the objects of trust. The results obtained make it possible to investigate the impact of the process of cultural modernization on the social capital of society.


Keywords
dispositional concept; sociocultural modernization syndrome; generalized trust; institutional trust; intergenerational analysis of culture modernization

References

Antonenko I. V. (2006) Socio-psychological concept of trust. Moscow: Flintа; Nauka. (In Russ.)

Bohannan P. (1974) Rethinking Culture. Current Anthropology. A world journal of the sciences of man. Vol. 14. No. 4: 357–372.

Covey S., Merrill R. (2010) The speed of trust. That which changes everything. Moscow: Alpina Publishing House. (In Russ.)

Culture: Man’s Adaptive Dimension. (1968) Еd. by A. Montague. N.Y.

Feinburg Z. I. (2008) The change of the historical type of culture in the conditions of modernity (some questions of the methodology of the problem). Izvestiya Severokavkaz. nauch. centra vyssh. shkoly. Obshchestvennye nauki. [Izv. North Caucasus. scientific center higher school. Social sciences]. No. 1: 28–34. (In Russ.)

Fukuyama F. (1978) Trust. Moscow: AST Moscow. (In Russ.)

Giddens A., Sutton Ph. (2018) Culture. In: Basic concepts in Sociology. Moscow: HSE: 227. (In Russ.)

Inglehart R. F. (2018) Cultural Evolution. People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge University Press.

Inglehart R., Welzel Ch. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press.

Kozyreva P. M. (2011) Trust and its Resources in Modern Russia. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)

Korobeynikov A. M. (2017) Social capital as a prerequisite for capitalizing the region’s human potential. In: Razvitie menedzhmenta v usloviyah perekhoda k cifrovoj ekonomike [Development of management in the context of the transition to a digital economy]. Perm: Perm State University: 178–184. (In Russ.)

Latov Yu.V. (2021) Institutional Trust as a Social Capital in Modern Russia (on the Results of Monitoring). Рolis. Politicheskie issledovaniia [Polis. Political Studies]. No. 5: 161–175. (In Russ.)

Markarian E. S. (1981) On the socio-managerial significance of the formation of cultural studies. In: Problems of planning, forecasting, management and study of culture as a whole. Perm: 9–12. (In Russ.)

Ogburn W. (1964) On culture and social change. Chicago.

Putnam R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Pochebut L. G., Sventsitsky A. L., Mararitsa L. V., Kazantseva T. V., Kuznetsova I. V. (2014). Social capital of personality. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russ.)

Self-regulation and forecasting of a person’s social behavior (2013): A dispositional concept. 2nd expanded ed. Moscow: TSSPIM. (In Russ.)

Seligman A. (2002) The problem of trust. Moscow: Idea-Press. (In Russ.)

Shikhirev P. N. (2003) The nature of social capital: socio-psychological approach. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Modernity]. No. 2: 17–31. (In Russ.)

Sztompka P. (2012) Trust is the foundation of society. Moscow: Logos. (In Russ.)

Vasserman Yu.M. (2004) Analysis of the socio-cultural consequences of the modernization of Russian society (some results of the pilot study). Uchenye zapiski gumanitarnogo fakul’teta [Scientific notes of the Faculty of Humanities]. No. 7: 225–239 (In Russ.)

Vasserman Yu.M. (2009) Work culture and the process of social modernization. Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva [Actual problems of development of modern Russian society]. Perm, Publishing House of PSTU: 78–102. (In Russ.)

Vasserman Yu.M. (2014) Modernization of culture and culture of property (the experience of longitudinal research). Vestnik PNIPU. Social’no-ekonomicheskie nauki [Bulletin of PNRPU. Socio-economic sciences]. No. 4 (25): 36–51. (In Russ.)

White L. A. (1969) The science of culture: A study of man and civilization. 2nd ed. New York.

Content No 3, 2022