printDevelopment of the Theory of Crisis in Sociology:
Evolving Ideas and Modernity
Кaterniy I.V.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof. of the Department of Sociology, MGIMO-University; Senior Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia yarkus@mail.ru
Rubric: XXV Kharchev readings
For citation:
Кaterniy I.V. Development of the Theory of Crisis in Sociology: Evolving Ideas and Modernity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 10. P. 14-26
Abstract
The paper explores the question of what crisis is from the perspective of classical and modern sociology laying out a framework for developing the concept of crisis sociality based on the theories of liminality and the morphogenetic approach. Three stages of evolution are identified in theorizing the social ontology of crisis as disruptive events and processes on macro and meso-scale. Based on expert opinions, the paper argues for a specific pattern of current global development in the form of an intercrisis structure of a permanent-liminal type. According to the model, core and peripheral crisis phenomena are singled out as well as transgressive characteristics of institutional liminality and types of coping-behavior strategies are analyzed. Crisis traits of a BANI-world and the YOLO-economy are discussed among other things. The historical foundation for current crisis sociality is seen to be the very nature of modernization process, as the intrinsic imbalance of morphogenetic and morphostatic elements of such development inevitably brings on crisis dynamics and the following liminalization of society.
Keywords
crisis; coping; BANI world; YOLO economy; modernization; liminality; morphogenesis; morphostasis
References
Agamben G. A che punto siamo? L’epidemia come politica. (2020) Moscow: Nookratiya. (In Russ.)
Amin S., Arrighi G., FrankA.G., Wallerstein I. (1982) Dynamics of Global Crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Arnason J. (2011) Communism and modernity. Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. No.1: 10–35. (In Russ.)
Blokhin A.A. (2020) Emergent and recurrent transboundary infection diseases in human life. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti [Path to Peace and Security]. No. 2 (59): 9–26. (In Russ.)
Campbell T., Hribernik M. (2020) A dangerous new era of civil unrest is dawning in the United States and around the world. Verisk Perspectives. An ISO emerging issues report. URL: https://www.verisk.com/insurance/products/emerging-issues/perspectives/a-dangerous-new-era-of-civil-unrest-is-dawning-inthe-united-states-and-around-the-world/ (accessed 29.08.2022).
Dennis B. (2021) COVID‑19’s long tail: Why we may be living with the effects of the disease for years to come. Verisk. URL: https://www.verisk.com/insurance/products/emerging-issues/perspectives/covid‑19s-long-tail-why-we-may-be-living-with-the-effects-of-the-disease-for-years-to-come/ (accessed 07.08.2022).
Dobry M. (1985) Sociologie des crises politiques. La dynamique des mobilisations multisectorielles. Paris: Presses de la FNSP.
Durkheim E. (2018 (1897)) Le Suicide: Étude de sociologie. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
Dynes R., Quarantelli E.L. (1977) Organizational Communications and Decision-Making in Crises. Report series No.17. Newark: University of Delaware Disaster Research Center.
Eisenstadt S.N. (1985) Comparative liminality: liminality and dynamics of civilization. Religion. Vol. 15 (3): 315–338.
Fassin D., Honneth A. (eds) (2022) Crisis under Critique. How People Assess, Transform and Respond to Critical Situations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fukuyama F. (2007) America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. Moscow: AST, Xranitel. (In Russ.)
Global Discourse: Special Issue: Critical Explorations of Crisis: Politics, Precariousness, and Potentialities. (2022) Guest ed. by H. Rydstrom, M. Hamza, T. Gammeltoft-Hansen, V. Berggren. Vol. 12 (3–4).
Global Impact of War in Ukraine: Energy Crisis. Brief No. 3. (2022) UN: UN Global crisis response group on food, energy and finance.
Goldstone J.A., Grinin L.E., Korotayev A.V. (2022) Waves of revolutions in the 21st century. POLIS. Polititcheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No. 4: 108–119. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.09. (In Russ.)
Guterres A. (2020) Remarks to the General Assembly on the Secretary-General’s priorities for 2020. UN Secretary-General’s Speeches. URL: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2020-01-22/remarks-general-assembly-priorities-for‑2020 (accessed 17.03. 2020).
Holton R. (1987) The idea of crisis in modern society. British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 38. No. 4: 502–520.
Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2011) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Moscow: Novoe izdatel‘stvo. (In Russ.)
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. (2021) Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ed. by V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katernyi I.V. (2019) Gender-sexual transmobility as a normative challenge in a posthuman world. Vestnik Tomskogo gosun-ta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science]. No. 48: 112–127. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/48/11. (In Russ.)
Katernyi I.V. Reconceptualization of status liminality in the sociological theory (2020). Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Sociologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. Vol. 20. No. 2: 226–238. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-2226-238. (In Russ.)
Kolennikova N.D. (2023) Russian society in the period of global turbulence: key challenges and opportunities. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 154–156. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250022957-5. (In Russ.)
Kondratieff N.D. (2002) Large Cycles of Conjuncture and the Theory of Foreseeing. Selected Works. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russ.)
Kravchenko S.A. (2019) Spiral of the complication of violence: a demand for a humanistic policy. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No. 5: 43–55. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.05.04. (In Russ.)
Lapin N.I. (2021) The Complexity of a New Russia Formation. Anthroposociocultural Approach. Moscow: Ves‘ Mir. (In Russ.)
Latour B. (2006) Nous n’avons jamais ete modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symetrique. St. Petersburg: EU v SPb. (In Russ.)
Pantin V.I., Malkov S.Yu., Grinin L.E. (2018) The Main Threats and Risks to Russia Under the Transition to a New world Order and How to Diminish Them: Strategic analysis. Moscow: Uchitel. (In Russ.)
Radaev V.V. (ed) (2023) How Russians Cope with a New Crisis: Socio-Economic Practices of the Population: Analytical Report. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Rothbard M.N. (2002 (1969)) Economic depressions: their cause and cure. Boom, Crash and the Future: An Analysis of the Austrian School. Chelyabinsk: Socium: 150–171. (In Russ.)
Sorokin P. (2006 (1937–1941)) Social and Cultural Dynamics. Moscow: Astrel. (In Russ.)
Steinmetz G. (2018) The crisis of history and the history of crisis: sociology as a ‘crisis science’. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No.10: 140–143. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250002166-5. (In Russ.)
Szakolczai A. (1998) Reflexive Historical Sociology. New York: Routledge.
Sztompka P. (1984). The global crisis and the reflexiveness of the social system. International Journal of Comparative sociology. Vol. XXV. No. 1–2: 45–58.
Turner V. (1983) Symbol and the Ritual. Collection of works. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
United Nations Environment Programme and International Livestock Research Institute. (2020) Preventing the Next Pandemic – Zoonotic Diseases and How to Break the Chain of Transmission. Nairobi, Kenya.
Walby S. (2015) Crisis. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Zakaria F. (2009) The Post-American World. Moscow: Evropa. (In Russ.)
Content No 10, 2023