printInformality in Society:
Searching for Explorative Methodology
Lеvichеvа V.F.
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof. ANPO to promote the development of civil society institutions “Fair World Institute”, Moscow, Russia levvf@mail.ru
Dimans S.L.
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof. Moscow State Academy of Physical Education, Moscow, Russia dimsl51@mail.ru
Rubric: Discussion. Polemics
For citation:
Lеvichеvа V.F., Dimans S.L. Informality in Society: Searching for Explorative Methodology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 11. P. 105-114
Abstract
The main purpose of the article is to discuss and propose a solution to the methodological problems arising in the study of fundamental social relations embedded in social institutions and informal practices. The authors present a concept based on the thesis of informal interactions as a relatively ontologically independent phenomenon in society. It is shown that informal practices act as a public and civilizational resource that determines not only the viability of society, but also its competitiveness in the global world. It is the totality of mass informal social communications outside the existing institutional framework that makes it possible to understand what a particular society is. The article analyzes some real situations of contradictory interaction of institutions and informal practices in Russian society. When analyzing the sources of informal practices, the authors distinguish inversive, adaptive and constructive informality as systematically ordered communications arising outside the institutional space. Such conceptualization expands the possibilities of understanding specific cases in the socio-economic and socio-political life of Russian society and provides grounds for their instrumental empirical research. study.
Keywords
methodology; social institution; informality; informal practices; social communications; norms; communities
References
Barsukova S.Yu. (2017) Essay on the informal economy, or 16 shades of gray. 2nd ed. Moscow: Izdatel`skij Dom Vy`sshej shkoly` e`konomiki. (In Russ.)
Bauman Z. (2005) The Individualized Society. Moscow: Logos. (In Russ.)
Bourdieu P. (2001) Practical Sense. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)
Castells M. (1999) The formation of a society of network structures In: New post-industrial wave in the West. Anthology. Ed. by V.L. Inozemtsev. Moscow: Academia: 494–505. (In Russ.)
Edgerton R.B. (1985) Rules, Exceptions, and Social Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lyotard J.-F. (1998) The state of Postmodernity. Moscow: Institut e`ksperimental`noj sociologii; Saint-Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)
North D. (1997) IInstitutions, institutional change and economic performance. Moscow: Fond e`konomicheskoj knigi Nachala. (In Russ.)
Hayek F.A. (2006) Law, legislation and liberty. A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Moscow: IRISEN. (In Russ.)
Helmke G., Levitsky S. (2007) Informal institutions and comparative politics: the main directions of research. Prognozis. No. 10: 187–211. (In Russ.)
Shcherbina V.V. (2015) Population-breeding model of organizational development: content, scope and prospects of application (Article 1). Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 78–86. (In Russ.)
Urry J. (2003) Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Content No 11, 2023