After the «End of History»: Conservative Neoliberalism and Refeodalization?

After the «End of History»:
Conservative Neoliberalism and Refeodalization?


Buzgalin A.V.

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor of the Faculty of Economics, Director of the Centre for Contemporary Marxist Studies, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow buzgalin@mail.ru

ID of the Article:


The reported study was funded by RFBR and CASS, project No. 21-511-93006.


For citation:

Buzgalin A.V. After the «End of History»: Conservative Neoliberalism and Refeodalization?. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 5. P. 133-144




Abstract

Thirty years ago, Francis Fukuyama in the article “The End of History?” (1989) formulated the thesis about the final victory of the neoliberal model of capitalism. However, the story doesn’t stop. The author shows that the reason for this is the crisis of the existing system of economic relations and institutions of late capitalism. The article systematizes the signs of this crisis and shows that the dominant political and economic elite is looking for a way out of the impasse through “neoliberal conservatism” integrating further dehumanization, desocialization and deregulation into the economy with conservative authoritarian tendencies in politics and ideology. The social basis of this trend is revealed, the social strata opposing it, focused on the progress of human potential and the formation of a more just world order, are characterized.


Keywords
neoliberalism; conservatism; refeudalization; “The End of History”; late capitalism; human potential; community of common destiny of mankind

References

Amin S. (1990) Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global Failure. Pambazuka Press.

Baudrillard J. (1981) Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Bulavka-Buzgalina L.A. (2018) Marx XXI: Social Progress and Its Price: Dialectics of Alienation and Disalienation. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. [Moscow State University Bulletin Series 7: Philosophy]. No. 5: 73–84. (In Russ.)

Buzgalin A.V. (2018) Late capitalism and its limits: dialectics of productive forces and production relations (to the 200th birth anniversary of Karl Marx). Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 2: 10–38. (In Russ.)

Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2012) Capital of the twenty-first century: the simulacrum as an object of analysis for critical Marxism. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 11: 31–42.

Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2022) Capitalism, Post-Capitalism and the Creative Revolution (critical reflections on the article by D.A. Davydov). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 100–109. (In Russ.)

Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2019) Social Structure Transformation of Late Capitalism: from Proletariat and Bourgeoisie Towards Precariat and Creative Class? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 18–28. (In Russ.)

Davidov D. (2021) Postcapitalism as Archaization: Institutional movement towards Neofeudalism. Antinomy. Vol 21. Is. 4: 61–78.

Dessai R. (2020) Geopolitical Economy: After American Hegemony, Globalization and Empire. Moscow: INIR them. S.Yu. Witte.

Fine B. (2013) Financialization from Marxist Perspective. International Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 42. Iss. 4: 47–66.

Galbraith J.K. (2007 [1967]) The New Industrial State. Princeton University Press.

Harvey D. (2006) Spaces of global capitalism: towards a theory of uneven geographical development. L.; N.Y.: Verso.

Hudson M. (2017) J is for Junk Economics: A Guide to Reality in an Age of Deception. Islet-Verlag.

Khubiev K., Tenyakov I. (2022). The fractured vector of development of the Russian economy. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 2: 22–39. (In Russ.)

Kotkin J. (2020) The Coming of Neo-Feudalism: A Warning to the Global Middle Class. Encounter Books.

Kotz D.M. (2015) The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. Harvard University Press.

Krugman P. (2009) The conscience of a liberal. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Meszaros I. (1970) Marx’s Theory of Alienation. London: Merlin Press.

Musto M. (2010) Revisiting Marx’s concept of alienation. Socialism and Democracy. Vol. 24. No. 3: 79–101.

Ollman B. (1971) Alienation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ollman B. (1976) Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Piketty T. (2013) Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows, Harvard College.

Stiglitz J.E. (2015) The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Tenyakov I.M. (2016) Approaches to the Evaluation of the Quality of Economic growth. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 4: 61–73. (In Russ.)

Wallerstein I. (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. London: Duke University Press.

Yakovleva N.G. (2021) Contradictions of transformation and genesis socially-oriented model of education (political economy approach). Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. Vol. 3. No. 27: 183–197. (In Russ.)

Yakovleva N.G. (2022) What Sprouts of Post-Capitalism are Capable of Ensuring Progress of Human Potential and Technological Modernization? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 110–115. (In Russ.)

Content No 5, 2023