Migrant integration on the local level:
results of an academic and practical project


Varshaver E.A.

MA in Sociology, MA in Government, Senior research fellow, Russian Presidential Academy for National Ecnomy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia varshavere@gmail.com

Rocheva A.L.

MA in Sociology, Research fellow, Russian Presidential Academy for National Ecnomy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia anna.rocheva@gmail.com

Ivanova N.S.

Research fellow, Russian Presidential Academy for National Ecnomy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia nataliya.ivanova.0709@gmail.com

ID of the Article:


For citation:

Varshaver E.A., Rocheva A.L., Ivanova N.S. Migrant integration on the local level: results of an academic and practical project. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2017. No 5. P. 110-117




Abstract

Evaluation and assessment, having become part and parcel of project management in large international non-governmental organizations and policy-making in the economically-developed countries nowadays, are still rare in the sphere of migrant integration practices all over the world. The abundance of migrant integration initiatives together with the lack of evaluated projects precludes this sphere from smooth progress. In Russia, even more so, efforts towards migrant integration are very few, suffer from the Soviet ‘multi-culti’ background and hardly ever imply evaluation part. This article demonstrates results of a project undertaken as an effort to create a toolkit for migrant integration on the local level that has to be effective. Basing on the contact theory and interculturalism, as well as sociological research in two Moscow neighborhoods in 2014–2015, we have developed and conducted four events which aim at social and identificational integration of different groups of migrants in these two localities: documentary films contest “Neighborhood faces”, “human library” at school, culinary workshops for migrant and non-migrant housewives, intercultural football tournament for ethnically-mixed teams. Together with the events, we have developed specific methodologies for their evaluation which include quantitative methods such as survey, quasi-experimental methods and video-analysis. The article describes these four integration practices, evaluation designs and results. The three integration practices that were assessed, prove to be effective as they reduce social tensions and negative stereotypes among “migrants” and “non-migrants”, and contribute to the higher identification with local community and new social ties’ formation. The major principle for successful migrant integration implies organization of regular and long-term contacts between different groups of migrants and non-migrants, basing on the resources of the specific locality.


Keywords
migrant integration; local community; integration practices; effectiveness assessment and evaluation; contact theory; interculturalism; Moscow neighborhoods

References

Варшавер Е. А. Теория контакта: обзор // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2015. № 5. С. 183–214. [Varshaver E. A. (2015) Contact theory: Review. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 5: 183–214. (In Russ.)]

Варшавер Е.А., Рочева А. Л. Интеграция мигрантов на локальном уровне: западный и российский опыт // Восток на Востоке, в России и на Западе: трансграничные миграции и диаспоры. Автор проекта, науч. и литератур. ред. С. Панарин. СПб.: Нестор-История, 2016 (a). С. 194–213. [Varshaver E. A., Rocheva A. L. (2016) Integracija migrantov na lokal’nom urovne: zapadnyj i rossijskij opyt. Vostok na Vostoke, v Rossii i na Zapade: transgranichnye migracii i diaspory [East in the East, in Russia and in the West]. Avtor proekta, red. S. Panarin. St. Petersburg: Nestor- Istorija, 2016a: 194–213. (In Russ.)]

Варшавер Е. А., Рочева А. Л. Интеграция мигрантов: что это и какую роль в ее осуществлении может играть государство // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2016b. Т. 14. № 3. С. 315–330. [Varshaver E. A., Rocheva A. L. (2016 b) Migrant Integration: what is it and what role does the state play in its implementation? The Journal of Social Policy Studies. T. 14. No. 3: 315– 330. (In Russ.)]

Варшавер Е. А., Рочева А. Л., Иванова Н. С. Район как сеть: методология и результаты исследования двух московских районов // Городские исследования и практики. 2017. № 5 (в печати). [Varshaver E. A., Rocheva A. L., Ivanova N. S. (2017) Rajon kak set’: metodologija i rezul’taty issledovanija dvuh moskovskih rajonov. In. Gorodskie issledovanija i praktiki. [Journal of Urban Studies and Practices]. No. 5 (in print). (In Russ.)]

Скотт Д. Благими намерениями государства. М.: Университетская книга, 2005. [Skott D. (2005) Blagimi Namerenijami Gosudarstva. [Seeing like a state]. Moscow: Universitetskaja kniga. (In Russ.)]

Allport G. W. (1979) The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Basic books.

Cameron L., Rutland A., Brown R., Douch R. (2006) Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. In: Child Development. Vol. 77. No. 5: 1208–1219.

Crisp R. J., Turner R. N. (2013) Imagined intergroup contact: Refinements, debates and clarifications. In: Advances in Intergroup Contact. Eds: G. Hodson, M. Hewstone. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis): 135–151.

Esser H. (2001) Integration und Ethnische Schichtung. Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.

Esser H. (2004) Does the ‘New’ Immigration Require a ‘New’ Theory of Intergenerational Integration? International Migration Review. No. 38 (3): 1126–1159.

Feddes A. R., Noack P., Rutland A. (2009) Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child development. Vol. 80. No. 2: 377–390.

Gruening G. Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International public management journal. 2001. Т. 4. No. 1: 1–25.

Heckmann F., Bosswick W. (2005) Integration and Integration Policies. Bamberg: European Forum for Migration Studies.

Heckmann F., Schnapper D. (eds) (2003) The Integration of Immigrants in European Socities: National Differences and Trends of Convergence. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

Miles E., Crisp R. J. (2014) A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Vol. 17. No. 1: 3–26.

Paolini S. et al. (2004) Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 30. No. 6: 770–786.

Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of personality and social psychology. Vol. 90. No. 5: 751–783.

Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2012) When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York: Psychology Press.

Turner R. N., Crisp R. J., Lambert E. (2007) Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Vol. 10. No. 4: 427–441.

White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue «Living Together As Equals in Dignity» (2008). Brussel: Council of Europe.

Content No 5, 2017