Social differences in attitudes toward migration in Russia and Western countries

Klupt M.A.

Dr. Sci (Econ.), Prof., Dean of Faculty of Humanities, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint- Petersburg, Russia

DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518010129
ID of the Article:

For citation:

Klupt M.A. Social differences in attitudes toward migration in Russia and Western countries. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2018. No 1. P. 112-120


The paper examines the circular causation among immigration, attitudes toward it and politics. Immigration problem is considered through the lenses of social groups’ interests. Indices of attitudes toward immigration are interpreted as empirical referents of such interests’ perception. Comparative analysis, based on the national opinion polls, shows that the differences in prevalence of negative attitudes towards immigration among various social, educational and age groups are less pronounced in Russia than in Western countries. In Russia, unlike the West, more educated groups are more anxious by immigration than less educated ones. Negative attitudes towards immigration are equally prevalent among Russian youth and elderly; this differs Russia from Western countries where the attitudes of the youth are more positive than those of the elderly. In contrast to Western countries, in Russia, as opinion polls show, the negative attitudes toward migration are more prevalent in megalopolises. In present-day Russia, immigration problem, unlike Western countries, is moved to the background of political agenda by other burning topics. Both “the liberals” and “the Eurasians” in Russian elite are not interested, although for different reasons, for dramatizing immigration controversies. Non-elite groups, despite wide prevalence of negative attitude towards immigration, appreciate, as opinion polls show, the contribution of labour migrants to certain economic activities. Socio-political networking is vital to reconcile conflicting immigration-related interests.

immigration; immigration policy; cross-country comparative analysis


Belen’kiy V.H. (2010) Intersected Parallels (On book Shakaratan O.I. “Social and Economic Inequality and its Reproduction in Modern Russia”). Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 145–154. (In Russ.)

Chernysh M.F. (2011) Culture or structure? Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 143–147. (In Russ.)

Chernysh M.F. (ed.) (2016) Sociocultural and sociostructural factors of interethnic tensions in the regions of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN. URL: (accessed 19.06.2017). (In Russ.)

Duffy B., Frere-Smith T. (2014) Perceptions and Reality. Public Attitudes to Immigration. Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.

Gudkov D., Zorkaya N. (2013) Sterilization of Social Differentiation: Russian ‘Middle Class’ and Emigration. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. No. 2: 23–49. (In Russ.)

Les Français et l’accueil des migrants. (2016) Ifop. URL: (accessed 19.06.2017).

Les Français et la crise des migrants en Europe (2016a). Ifop. URL: (accessed 19.06.2017).

Les Français et l’immigration (2015). Ifop. URL: (accessed 19.06.2017).

How the world views migration. (2015). IOM.

Ipsos MORI. Issues Index May 2016 (public – final). URL: Polls/issues-index-may‑2016-tables.pdf (accessed 19.06.2017).

Le profil des é lecteurs et les clefs du premier tour de l’é lection pré sidentielle (2017). Ifop. URL: -1-study_ file.pdf (accessed 19.06.2017).

Shkaratan O.I. (2009) Socio-Economic Inequality and its Reproduction in Modern Russia. Moscow. ZAO OLMA Media Grupp. (In Russ.).

Sokolov N.V. (2017) Hard-working but outsiders: paradox of perception of migrants in mass consciousness (the case of St. Petersburg). Monitoring Obschestvennogo Mneniya Economicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No.1: 80–96 (In Russ.)

Vorob’eva O.D. Rybakovskiy L.L., Rybakovsky O.L. (2016) Migration Policy of Russia: History and Modernity. Moscow: Econom-Inform. (In Russ.)

Content No 1, 2018