Metatheorizing in sociology
review of discourse and a forecast


Romanovskiy N.V.

Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Prof., Russian State University for Humanities, Deputy Head Editor “Sotsiologitcheskie Issledovaniya” journal, Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of Federal Сenter for Applied and Theoretical research, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia socis@isras.ru

DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518020137
ID of the Article:

Rubric: Anniversary

For citation:

Romanovskiy N.V. Metatheorizing in sociology: review of discourse and a forecast. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2018. No 2. P. 127-135




Abstract

The paper discusses origins and present­day state of metatheorzing (MT). Mainstream sociology is shown to be the place of origin of respective debates with G. Ritzer initiating respective current discourse. Though earlier views feature instructive views of their own, Ritzer’s ideas of early 1990th remain today departing point for discutants; they are summarized in the opening paragraphs of the paper with ensuing author’s additions to reflect shifts in sociological MT of more than two recent decades. Russian сontemporary debate on the topic is also highligthed. The overall discourse of MT is seen as strides towards a new paradigm (in T. Kuhn terms of scientific revolution) in social science. Arguably, this fact is reflected in certain features of today’s sociology such as historical and cultural turns, big data revolution, post­colonial views advances, etc. Most probably, the decisive shift in MT shall be basically infuenced by newly born all­encompassing global social realities. Some interpretations of the latters, as reflected in contemporary sociological discourse, are mеntioned in this context stressing the role of new humanism, of a turn in social sciences to human beings as segments of global community and as becoming subjects of history.


Keywords
Мета­theorizing; G. Ritzer; post­Soviet sociology; paradigmatic shift; T. Kuhn; scientific revolution; new humanism

References

Abernathy D. (2016) Using Geodata and geolocation in the social sciences: mapping out our connected world. London: Sage.

Alexander J. (1991) Sociological Theory and the Claim to Reason: Why the End Is Not in Sight. Sociological Theory. V. 10 (2): 147–153.

Alexander J. The Meaning of Social Life. A Cultural Sociology. Moscow: Praxis. 2013. (In Russ.)

Archer М. (2001) Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Sage.

Bhambra G.К., dos Santos B. (2017) Global challenges for sociology/ Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). No. 9: 3–8. (In Russ.)

Devyatko I.F. (2003) Sociological Theories of Activity and Practical Rationality. Мoscow: Avanti plus. (In Russ.)

Dogan М. (2010) Sociology among social sciences. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). No. 10: 3–13. (In Russ.)

Dudina V.I. Strategies of Metatheorizing in Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). No. 12: 10–19. (In Russ.)

Friedrichs R.W. (1970) A Sociology of Sociology. New York: Free Press.

Furfey P.H. (1953) The Scope and Method of Sociology: A Meta­Sociological Treatise. New York: Cooper Square.

Harvey D. (2014) Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ivanov D.V. (2013a) Evolution of sociology and evolutionary metatheorizing/ Теlescop. No. 4 (100): 13– 19. (In Russ.)

Ivanov D.V. (2013b) Evolution stages of sociology and dominant types of theorizing. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). No. 9: 3–13. (In Russ.)

Ignatyev V.I. (2016) The Information Resоnance in Social System: Monograph. Novosibirsk: NSTU Publisher.

Kuhn T. (1970(1970)) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lenin V.I. (1912) A talk on “kadet­eating”. In: Lenin V.I. Complete works. Vol. 22: 61–68. (In Russ.)

Levchenko I.Е. (2014) A History of US sociology. Practicum. Еkaterinburg: Urals University editors. (In Russ.)

Ritzer G. (1990) Meta­Theorizing in Sociology. Sociological Forum. Vol. 5. No. 1: 3–15.

Ritzer G. (2002) Contemporary Sociological Theories. Moscow, St.­Petersburg e.a. Piter. (In Russ.)

Ritzer G. (2007) Metatheory. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology / Ed. by G. Ritzer. Malden, MA et al.: Blackwell Publishing: 2964–2967.

Sheller M., Urry J. (2006) The New Mobilities Paradigm. Environment and Planning. Vol. 38. No. 2: 207–226.

Sheller М. (2016) New mobilities paradigm in modern sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). No. 7: 3–11. (In Russ.)

Skliar L. (2016) End of the world or end of capitalism? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). No. 11: 165–167. (In Russ.)

Takahashi S. (2014) Japan’s Making of ‘Western Society’ without Democratic Social Foundations: A Historical Analysis of the Meiji Era and Beyond, 1850s–1900s. XVIII World Coingress of Sociology. Book of Abstracts. Yokohama: 956.

Тоshchenko Zh.Т. (2016) Sociology of Life: monograph. Мoscow: UNITY­date. (In Russ.)

Тrotsuk I.V. (2017) Оn metatheorizing in analyses of textual data. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). No. 9: 12–21. (In Russ.)

Turner J.H. (2014) Theoretical sociology: a concise introduction to twelve sociological theories. Los Angeles: Sage.

Zamiatin D.N. (2003) Humanitarian geography: Space and language of geogrtaphic images. St.­Petersburg. (In Russ.)

Zborovskiy G.E. (2015). A History of sociology: contemporary stage. Surgut e.a.: SurSPTU. (In Russ.)

Content No 2, 2018