Social Structure Transformation of Late Capitalism:
from Proletariat and Bourgeoisie Towards Precariat and Creative Class?
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Director of the Center for Modern Marxist Studies, Prof., Department of Political Economy, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Head Researcher, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Visiting Prof., University of Cambridge (Cambridge, UK), Hainan Normal University (Haikou, P.R. China) and Harbin University (Harbin, P.R. China), Moscow, Russia firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Laboratory on Comparative Studies of Socio-Economic Systems at the Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Chief Researcher, Institute of Economy, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia email@example.com
This text presents results of research on the social and class structure of modern society from the positions of the post-Soviet school of Critical Marxism. It is shown that the social stratification of the society of late capitalism is characterized by the diffusion of classes and the active formation of inter- and intra-class layers. A Marxist interpretation of the transformations in the sphere of productive forces and production relations that caused significant changes in the social structure of the countries of the ‘center’ and certain semi-periphery countries (in particular, Russia) is given. Contradictions of the creative class resulting from these transformations are revealed, and its heterogeneity is shown. Classification of the layers composing the creative class was carried out according to two criteria: its place in social production and its place in the system of production relations. So, according to the criterion of place in social production, the creative class is divided into persons engaged in the creatosphere and creating the phenomena of culture and creative qualities of a person, and those engaged in the perversed (useless) sector and ‘creatively’ creating useless goods. According to the criterion of place in the system of production relations, the ‘creative class’ is divided into individuals engaged in the public sector of the creatosphere (the authors call this layer ‘the core of the socialiat’) and individuals engaged in the commercial sector of the creatosphere. The authors introduced scientific concept of ‘socialiat’ to describe the public sector employees who make up the protoclass within the creative class. The characteristics of the core and the periphery of the socialiat as a protoclass are given. The analysis of the precariat as an alter ego of the socialiat available in modern literature is developed in the article. The characteristics of these protoclasses as products of the contradictions of the beginning creative revolution are revealed. A characteristic of the dynamics of the development of the middle class is given in the context of the transformation of the universal law of capitalist accumulation in the conditions of late capitalism.
Baudrillard J. (2007) To Criticism of the Political Economy of the Sign. Moscow: Academicheskii proekt. (In Russ.)
Begbeder F. (2005) 99 francs. Moscow: Inostranka. (In Russ.)
Bodrunov S.D. (2016) The Future. New Industrial Society Reloaded. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: INID n.a. S.Yu. Witte. (In Russ.)
Bodrunov S.D. (2018) Noomics. St. Petersburg: INID n.a. S.Yu. Witte. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V. (2018) Late Capitalism and Its Limits: Dialectics of Productive Forces and Production Relations The Decline of Neo-liberalism (to the 200th Birth Anniversary of Karl Marx). Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Questions of Political Economy]. No. 2: 10–38. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2018) Global Capital. 4th ed. In 2 vol. Vol. 2: Global Hegemony of Capital and Its Limits (“Capital” Re-loaded). Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)
Dzhabborov D.B. (2016) Progress of Human Qualities: Market and Post-market Mechanisms to Stimulate Social and Economic Development. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [The Economic Revival of Russia]. No. 4: 68–73. (In Russ.)
Florida R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
Florida R. (2014) The Rise of the Creative Class – Revisited. New York: Basic Books.
Khubiev K. A. (2018) Innovative Economy against the Wage form of Labor. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Questions of Political Economy]. No. 1: 55–61. (In Russ.)
Kolganov A.I., Buzgalin A.V. (2014) Re-industrialization as Nostalgia? Theoretical Discourse. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No.1: 80–94. (In Russ.)
Lane D. (2016) “Post-capitalism” as a New Economic System: A Critique. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Questions of Political Economy]. No. 3: 8–21. (In Russ.)
Mandel E. (1987) Late Capitalism. London; New York: Verso.
Toshchenko Zh.T. (2015) Precariat – a New Social Class. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 3–13 (In Russ.)
Toshchenko Zh.T. (2018) Precariat: from Protoclass to New Class. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Toussaint E. (2017) Bankocracy. Delhi: Aakkar Books.
Yakovleva N.G. (2018) Education in Russia: Public Good or Commercial Service? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No 3: 149–153. (In Russ.)
Yakovleva N.G. (2017) Commercialization, Bureaucratization, Managerization of Education in PostSoviet Russia: Political-economic View. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravlenija [Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management]. No. 3: 122–130. (In Russ.)