Communicative Mechanisms of Modern Conceptual Oppositions

Communicative Mechanisms of Modern Conceptual Oppositions


Adamyants T.Z.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia tamara-adamiants@yandex.ru

ID of the Article:


For citation:

Adamyants T.Z. Communicative Mechanisms of Modern Conceptual Oppositions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 3. P. 98-105




Abstract

The article is about battles that unfold in global socio-cultural space and focuses on the qualitative changes in the consciousness of millions of people. The concept of «sense» is regarded here as a virtual construct that consists of multiple levels of communicative-cognitive programs that have a hierarchical organization and focus on intentional (motive-target) dominant. Features of the internal organization of sense constructs that can be expressed in terms not only of communicative means, are discussed in this article. The impact of such constructs may manifest itself for a long time. Special attention is given to the sense constructs, which are aimed at manipulation. The scientific concepts that focus on sense features of communication and interaction between people and therefore affect qualitative features of modern socio-cultural environment are also considered in this article. Positive change is possible only when there are dialogue and understanding between the communicating parties.


Keywords
communicator; audience; sense; sense construct; understanding; intention; sense battles; manipulation; manipulative technology; dialogue; semiosociopsihology

References

Adamyants T.Z. (2016) Latent Technologies of Information Wars and Double Standard. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 123–127 (in Russ.).

Adamyants T.Z. (2017) Social Meanings of Global Processes and Changes: Mechanisms and Catalysts. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=5020 (accessed 10.08.18). (In Russ.)

Adamyants T.Z. (2016) Sociomental Development of Personality as a Strategic task of Russia. In: Russia: Trends and Prospectivs. Yearbook. Ed. by W.S. Gerasimow. Iss. 11. P. 2. Moscow: INION RAS: 1–13. (In Russ.)

Adamyants T.Z. (2015). Sociomental Groups in Social Cognition. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No 7: 117–128. (In Russ.)

Bart R. (1994) Selected Works: Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress, Univers: 384–391. (In Russ.)

Derrida J. (2007) Writing and Difference. Moscow: Academ. proekt. (In Russ.)

Dilthey W. (1996) Descriptive Psychology. Second Edition. Saint Petersburg: Aleteja. (In Russ.)

Dridze T.M. (2000) Two New Paradigms for Social Cognition and Social Practice. In: Social Communication and Social Management in Ecoanthropocentric and Semio Sociopsychological Paradigms. Book 1. Moscow: IS RAS: 5–42. (In Russ.)

Dridze T.M. (1984) Text Activity in the Structure of Social Communication. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Ionova O.E. (2010) Construction of Social Reality in the Theory of Coordinated Management of Meaning Formation. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta [Bulletin MGIMO University]. No. 4: 130–136. (In Russ.)

Mann S.R. (1992) Chaos Theory and Strategic Thought. Parameters (US Army War College Quarterly). Vol. XXII. Autumn: 54–68.

Nai J. (2006) Flexible Power. How to Succeed in World Politics. Moscow: Trend. (In Russ.)

Pearce W.B. (2007) Making Social Worlds: A Communication Perspective. Madlen, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Pearce W.B., Cronen V.E. (1980) Communication, Action and Meaning: The Creation of Social Realities. New York: Praeger.

Pocheptsov G.G. (2015) The Information Wars. New Policy Tool. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russ.)

Rastorguev S.P. (2006) Information War. Problems and Models. Moscow: Gelios APV. (In Russ.)

Schütz A. (2004) Selected Works: The World of Glowing Sense. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Weber M. (1990) Selected Works. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

Content No 3, 2019