Stressful Characteristics of Work of Russian and French Software Developers


Kozina I.М.

Сand. Sci. (Soc.), Prof., National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia. ikozina@hse.ru

Serezhkina Е.V.

Сand. Sci. (Soc.), Senior Lecturer, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia. katerinaserezhkina@gmail.com

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004950-8
ID of the Article:


For citation:

Kozina I.М., Serezhkina Е.V. Stressful Characteristics of Work of Russian and French Software Developers. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 5. P. 26-35




Abstract

The paper discusses stress factors coming from the work content and labor conditions among Russian and French software developers. Empirical analysis used in our research is based on the case study in two IT companies, in Russia and France. The results indicate that the main factors leading to stress are work overload, uncertainty about the future and career, lack of the feedback and limitations for creativity. Together, these factors form a common «professional risk zone». However, their character and the degree of impact on workers do differ between two companies. In particular, Russian programmers adapt better to stressors due to perceiving negative work conditions as close to normal for an extended period of time. As result, the time when the stress moves into its detrimental stage and starts affecting the performance remains unnoticed for both, management and worker.


Keywords
work-related stress; workplace stressors; work environment; psychosocial hazards; occupational safety and health

References

Журавлева А., Сергиенко Е. (ред.) Стресс, выгорание, совладание в современном контексте. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2011. [Zhuravleva A., Sergienko E. (eds) (2011) Stress, Burnout, Coping in a Contemporary Context. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN. (In Russ.)].

Козина И., Серёжкина Е. Концепция кейс-стади в социальных науках и французская традиция монографических исследований трудовых организаций // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 1. С. 64–73. [Kozina I., Serezhkina E. (2015) Case-study Concept in Social Sciences and French Traditions of Labor Organization Monographic Studies. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 64–73. (In Russ.)].

Серёжкина Е. Теории и политика управления стрессом на рабочем месте во Франции // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2015. №1. С. 158–163. [Serezhkina E. (2015) Theory and Politics of Workplace Stress Management in France. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial'noy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies]. No.1: 158–163. (In Russ.)].

Сыченко Е. Защита работников от психосоциальных рисков: опыт Европы и его применимость в России. Часть I: Защита работников от стресса, связанного с работой // Трудовое право. 2014. №7. С. 103–111. [Sychenko E. (2014) Protection of Workers from Psychosocial Risks: the Experience of Europe and Its Applicability in Russia. Part I: Protecting Employees from Work-related Stress. Trudovoye pravo [Labour Law]. No. 7: 103–111. (In Russ.)].

Barley S., Knight D. (1992) Toward a Cultural Theory of Stress Complaints. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 14: 1–48.

Buscatto M., Loriol M., Weller J.-M. (2008) Au-delà du stress au travail. Une sociologie des agents publics au contact des usagers. Paris: Erès.

Clot Y. (2010) Le travail à cœur. Pour en finir avec les risques psychosociaux. Paris: La Découverte.

Cox T., Karanika-Murray M., Griffiths A., Houdmont J. (2008) Evaluating Organizational-level Work Stress Interventions: Beyond Traditional Methods. Work & Stress. No. 21: 348–362.

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (2014) Calculating the Cost of Work-related Stress and Psychosocial Risks. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Golderberg D., Williams P. (1988) A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

Hall R. (2006) Temporary Agency Work and HRM in Australia: Cooperation, Specialization and Satisfaction for the Good of All? Personnel Review. Vol. 35. No. 2: 158–174.

ILO (2012) Solve: Integrating Health Promotion into Workplace OSH Policies – Trainer’s Guide. Geneva: International Labour Office.

ILO (2016) Workplace Stress: A Collective Challenge. Geneva: International Labour Office.

Karasek R., Theorell T. (1990) Healthy Work, Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of the Working Life. New York: Basic Books.

Landier H. (2008) Evaluer le climat social de votre entreprise. Paris: Eyrolles.

Légeron P. (2001) Le stress au travail. Paris: Odile Jacob.

Loriol M. (2003) Le temps de la fatigue, la gestion sociale du mal être au travail. Paris: Anthropos.

Marmot M., Siegrist J., Theorell T. (2006) Health and the Psychosocial Environment at Work. In: Marmot M., Wilkinson R.G. (eds) Social Determinants of Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Murphy L. (1995) Occupational Stress Management: Current Status and Future Directions. Trends in Organizational Behavior. No. 2: 1–14.

Palmer S., Cooper C., Thomas K. (2003) Revised Model of Organizational Stress for Use within Stress Prevention/ Management and Wellbeing Programs – Brief Update. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. Vol. 41. No 2: 57–68.

Servant D. (2013) Le stress au travail. Prévention et prise en charge en thérapies comportementales et cognitives. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson SAS.

Schorn A. (2000) The «Theme-centered Interview»: a Method to Decode Manifest and Latent Aspects of Subjective Realities. Forum Qualitative Research. Vol. 1. No. 2. URL: http://www.qualitative-research. net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/1092/2395 (accessed 19.01.19).

Weller J.-M. (2002) Stress relationnel et distance au public. De la relation de service à la relation d’aide. Sociologie du travail. No. 44: 75–97.

Content No 5, 2019