Integration of Migrants from Azerbaijan and Other Post-Soviet Countries:
a Comparative Analysis


Endryushko A.A

Junior Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Interethnic Relations, Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia anna.endryushko@mail.ru

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009906-9
ID of the Article:


For citation:

Endryushko A.A Integration of Migrants from Azerbaijan and Other Post-Soviet Countries: a Comparative Analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2020. No 11. P. 84-95




Abstract

Through the ethnocultural and country differences, the article analyzes the success of integration into Russian society of labor migrants from Azerbaijan and six other countries of the former USSR - Armenia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Based on the approaches of Dutch and German authors, proposing to interpret integration as a process of including migrants in the existing social systems of the host society, the analysis is divided into three areas: political and legal integration, socio-economic integration, cultural-identification integration. As an empirical base, we used the data of the all-Russian survey of labor migrants in 2017, conducted by the Center for Ethnopolitical and Regional Studies in 19 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Based on the results of the analysis, it was concluded that migrants from Azerbaijan occupy, in general, an intermediate position between the most integrated immigrants from Ukraine, Belarus and Armenia, on the one hand, and the least integrated ones of the Central Asian countries, on the other.


Keywords
labor migrants; migrants from Azerbaijan; integration of migrants; political and legal integration; socio-economic integration; cultural-identification integration; all-Russian identity

References

Мукомель В.И. Ксенофобия: этнофобии и мигрантофобии принимающего населения // Социальные факторы межэтнической напряженности в России: монография / Отв. ред. Ю.Б. Епихина, М.Ф. Черныш. Москва: ФНИСЦ РАН, 2017. С. 146–196. [Mukomel V.I. (2017) Xenophobia: Ethnophobia and Migrant Phobia of the Host Population. In: Epikhina Yu.B., Chernysh M.F. (eds) Social Factors of Interethnic Tension in Russia: monograph. Moscow: FNISTs RAN: 146–196. (In Russ.)]

Чудиновских О.С. Статистика приобретения гражданства как отражение особенностей миграционной политики России // Вопросы статистики. 2018. Т. 25. № 9. С. 3–26. [Chudinovskikh O.S. (2018) Statistics on Citizenship Acquisition as a Reflection of the Peculiarities of the Russian Migration Policy. Voprosy statistiki. Vol. 25. No. 9: 3–26. (In Russ.)]

Entzinger H. (2007) The Social Integration of Immigrants in the European Union. URL: https://www.jil.go.jp/ foreign/event/symposium/sokuho/documents/20070117/Entzinger_ppt.pdf (accessed 21.11.2019).

Entzinger H., Biezeveld R. (2003) Benchmarking in Immigrant Integration. Report for the European Commission. Rotterdam. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251998179_Benchmarking_ in_Immigrant_Integration (accessed 27.02.2020).

Esser H. (2004) Does the “New” Immigration Require a “New” Theory of Intergenerational Integration? The International Migration Review. Vol. 38. No. 3: 1126–1159.

Heckmann F. (2005) Integration and Integration Policies: IMISCOE Network Feasibility Study. Bamberg: europäisches forum für migrationsstudien (efms) Institut an der Universität Bamberg. URL: https:// nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-192953 (accessed 21.11.2019).

Penninx R. (2005) Integration of Migrants: Economic, Social, Cultural, and Political Dimensions. In: Macura M., MacDonald A.L., Haug W. (eds) The New Demographic Regime: Population Challenges and Policy Responses. New York; Geneva: United Nations: 137–152.

Penninx R. (2019) Problems of and Solutions for the Study of Immigrant Integration. Comparative Migration Studies. Vol. 7. Article no. 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0122-x.

Content No 11, 2020