printOn the Way to a Sovereign Russian Civilization
Titarenko L.G.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Belarusian State University, Belarus; Associate Researcher, Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS, Russia larissa@bsu.by
Rubric: Reflecting on a book
For citation:
Titarenko L.G. On the Way to a Sovereign Russian Civilization. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 10. P. 162-167
Abstract
The scientific significance, theoretical relevance of the monograph “Russian society: architectonics of civilizational development” are explored. Published two years ago, the monograph has become even more relevant in the new socio-political situation, which confirms that Russia has no other way of development than a sovereign one. The latter suggests the need for its own concept of civilizational development of Russia, one of the variants of which is proposed by the authors of the monograph. The presented author’s theoretical interpretation of Russian civilization takes into account previous approaches to civilization, bringing together the socio-structural, socio-cultural, institutional and subjective aspects. The interest to the monograph is increased by the consideration of debatable interpretations of civilization and its determinants, as well as well-reasoned criticisms of another approach to the path of Russian civilization development – modernization. The authors show that this path involves dependence on Western models, without taking into account the national specifics of culture, identity, and the peculiarities of the socio-economic structure of Russia, and therefore it loses to the civilizational one, which offers a model of sovereign development.
Keywords
Russian civilization; civilizational approach; multi-modernities; modernization; sovereign development
References
Auzan A.A. (2007) The “track” of Russian modernization. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and modernity]. No. 6: 54–60. (In Russ.)
Bessonova O.E. (2008) Integral-Institutional Paradigm of Civilizational Development as a New Methodology of Cognition. Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. No. 2: 15–32. (In Russ.)
Eisenstadt S.N. (2000) The Civilizational Dimension in Sociological Analysis. Thesis Eleven. Vol. 62. No. 1: 1–21.
Ionov I.N. (2007) Civilization consciousness and historical knowledge: problems of interaction. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Karasev D.Yu. (2021) J.Arnason’s relational-civilizational approach and the global dimension of Soviet modernity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 151–156. (In Russ.)
Lapin N.I. (2015a) Fundamental values of civilizational choice in the 21st century. Part 1. Human civilization before choosing the configuration of fundamental values. Voprosy Filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. No. 4: 3–16. (In Russ.)
Lapin N.I. (2015b) Fundamental values of civilizational choice in the 21st century. Part 2. Axiological prerequisites for the civilizational choice of Russia. Voprosy Filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. No. 6: 3–17. (In Russ.)
Merton R.K. (2006) Social theory and social structure / Transl. from Eng. by E.N. Egorova; scientif. ed. Z.V. Koganova. Moscow: AST, Khranitel. (In Russ.)
Russia as a civilization: materials for reflection (2015) / O.I. Shkaratan, V.N. Leksin, G.A. Yastrebov (eds). Moscow: Mir Rossii. (In Russ.)
Shkaratan O.I. (2010) Systems of civilization and models of socio-economic development of Russia and other post-communist countries of Europe. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. No. 3: 23–45. (In Russ.)
Titarenko L.G. (2022) Theoretical sociology in modern Russia: global and national perspectives. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 3–14. (In Russ.)
Content No 10, 2023