Request for Global Dialogue (Notes From the XX World Sociological Association Congress)

Request for Global Dialogue (Notes From the XX World Sociological Association Congress)


Kirdina-Chandler S.G.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Chief Researcher, Head of the sector for the evolution of social and economic systems, Institute of Economics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. kirdina@bk.ru

ID of the Article:


For citation:

Kirdina-Chandler S.G. Request for Global Dialogue (Notes From the XX World Sociological Association Congress). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 12. P. 3-14




Abstract

The 20th Congress of the International Sociological Association in Melbourne, Australia, June 25 – July 1, 2023, demonstrated a number of trends in modern sociological knowledge development. The paper explores one of the noted trends, namely the request for a new global dialogue between countries. In contrast to the “unilateral dialogue” from the position of Western world leaders in academia, the new dialogue involves a process of communicative interaction with at least two equal international centers capable of not only hearing each other, but also aimed at the development of each of these centers and mutual understanding between them. Such a global dialogue is aimed at overcoming the aggression caused by the “monologue” egoistic view of the world. The paper discusses the causes and meaning of the global dialogue, shows indicators that request for such a dialogue, identifies existing obstacles to the dialogue and ways to overcome them. The prospect for Russian sociologists to contribute to the global humanitarian dialogue in the modern world is argued for. The paper is based on an analysis of the congress materials and personal impressions during its sessions, a review of the relevant literature and some bibliometric data.


Keywords
global dialogue; contemporary sociological theory; peripheral turn; postcolonial discourse; theoretical synthesis

References

Aron R. (1992) Stages of Development of Sociological Thought. Trans. from French. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

Bakhtin M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin M.M. (2002) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. In: Collected Works. In 7 vols. Moscow: Russkie slovari: YaSK. Vol. 6: 7–300, 466–505. (In Russ.)

Bello W. (2004) Deglobalization – Ideas for a New World Economy (Global Issues). London: Zed Books.

Berger P.L. (2002) Whatever Happened to Sociology? First Things. October (126): 27–29.

Chakrabarty D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Grinin L.E. (1999) Formations and civilizations. Part 2. Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 3: 5–53. (In Russ.)

Joseph G.G., Reddy V., Searle-Chatterjee M. (1990) Eurocentrism in the Social Sciences. Race & Class. No. 31(4): 1–26. DOI: 10.1177/030639689003100401.

Kagan R. (2008) The Return of History and the End of Dreams. New York: Vintage.

Kirdina S.G. (2008) Modern Sociological Theories: an Actual Confrontation? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 18–28. (In Russ.)

Kirdina S.G. (2014) Institutional Matrices and Development of Russia. Introduction to X-Y-theory. 3rd ed. Moscow – St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)

Kuhn M. (2013) ”Hegemonic Science“: Critique Strands, Counterstrategies, and Their Paradigmatic Premises. In: Kuhn M., Yazawa S. (eds) Theories about and Strategies against Hegemonic Social Sciences. Tokyo: Center for Glocal Studies Seijo University: 31–54.

Osterhammel J. (2001) Geschichtswissenschaft jenseits des Nationalstaats. Studien zu Beziehungsgeschichte und Zivilisationsvergleich. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Qi X. (2013) Intellectual entrepreneurs and the diffusion of ideas: Two historical cases of knowledge flow. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. No. 1(3): 346–372. DOI: 10.1057/ajcs.2013.5.

Samuels W. (2015) “Truth” and “Discourse” in the Social Construction of Economic Reality. In: Origins: Qualitative shifts in economic reality and economic science. Moscow: VSHE: 13–30. (In Russ.)

Sapir E. (1993) The status of linguistics as a science. In: Selected Works on Linguistics and Cultural Studies. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

Shubrt I. (2021) Thoughts on modern Russian sociology and its prospects. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 5–15. (In Russ.)

Silver B.J., Payne C.R. (2020) Crises of world hegemony and the speeding up of social history. In: Hegemony and World Order. Reimagining Power in Global Politics / Ed. by P. Dutkiewicz, T. Casier, J.A. Scholte. New York: Routledge: 17–31.

Sledzevsky I.V. (2011) Dialogue of Civilizations as a Semantic Field of World Politics. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost [Social Sciences and Modernity]. No. 2: 145–156. (In Russ.)

Thompson W.R. (2007) Global War and the Foundations of US Systemic Leadership. In: “America, War and Power: Defining the State, 1775–2005”. Ch. 7. Ed. by L. Sondhaus, A.J. Fuller. London; New York: Routledge.

Titarenko L.G. (2023) Russian Sociology in Search of Responces to Theoretical Challenges. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 15–25. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250025794-6. (In Russ.)

Wallerstein I. (2003) The Decline of American Power: The U.S. in a Chaotic World. New York: The New Press.

Woolf S. (2003) Europe and Its Historians. Contemporary European History. Vol. 12. No. 12: 323–337.

Zinoviev I.V. (2008) Problems of Russian Philosophy of Dialogue (Historical and Philosophical Analysis). Doctor of Philosophy thesis. Yekaterinburg: UrGU im. A.M. Gorkogo. (In Russ.)

Content No 12, 2023