printMarriage Choice of Immigrants in Russia:
Main Characteristics and Relationship with Integration
Endryushko A.A
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia anna.endryushko@mail.ru
Endryushko A.A Marriage Choice of Immigrants in Russia: Main Characteristics and Relationship with Integration. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 7. P. 17-30
The article shows features of the choice of spouses by immigrants from the CIS, Ukraine and Georgia in Russia, as well as the relationship of marriage choice to integration of foreign citizens in Russian society. The empirical basis of the study was sociological surveys of immigrants conducted by the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Scientific Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2017 and 2020 (8577 and 700 respondents respectively). The preservation of the ethno-cultural distance between immigrants and the host Russian society is shown, since the “importing” of spouses from their homeland remains overwhelming. During the study, two groups of respondents were identified: whose spouses have and do not have Russian citizenship. The author analyzes the integration parameters of these groups and comes to the conclusion that the former are better integrated into the host society. Particular attention is paid to cultural integration. It is shown that the choice of Russians as spouses contributes to the formation of interethnic trust and a sense of belonging to the host society (all-Russian identity) among immigrants, as well as more modernized values, such as gender equality and personal freedom. At the same time, it is concluded that mixed marriages of immigrants and Russians are not associated with cultural assimilation, they should be considered as a process of counter movement of their cultures.
Biryukova S.S. (2015) The contribution of international migrants to the birth rate and marriage rate of Russian regions. In: Donets E.V., Chudinovsky O.S. (eds) Modern studies of population migration: Coll. of art. Moscow: Ekon. f-t MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova: 19–30. (In Russ.)
Endryushko A.A. (2022) Transformation of immigrant values in the context of their cultural integration: attitude to divorce and premarital sexual relations. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review]. No. 3(9): 58–74. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v9i3.16470. (In Russ.)
Esteve A., Bueno X. (2012) Marrying after migration: Assortative mating among Moroccans in Spain. Genus. No. 68(1): 41–63. DOI: 10.4402/genus-361.
González-Ferrer A., Obućina O., Cortina C., Castro Martín T. (2018) Mixed marriages between immigrants and natives in Spain: The gendered effect of marriage market constraints. Demographic Research. No. 39(1): 1–32. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.1.
Kalmijn M. (1998) Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology. No. 24: 395–421. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395.
Kalmijn M., van Tubergen F. (2006) Ethnic intermarriage in the Netherlands: confirmations and refutations of accepted insights. European Journal of Population. No. 22(4): 371–397. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-006-9105–3.
Kantarevic J. (2004) Interethnic marriages and economic assimilation of immigrants. IZA–Institute for the Study of Labor. Discussion Paper Series. No. 1142.
Lesthaeghe R. (2010) The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review. No. 36(2): 211–251. DOI:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x.
Lucassen L., Laarman C. (2009) Immigration, intermarriage and the changing face of Europe in the post war period. History of the Family. No. 14(1): 52–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.hisfam.2008.12.001.
Lurie S.V. (2018) Interethnic marriages in the modern Russian national scenario. Peterburgskaya sociologiya segodnya [Petersburg Sociology Today]. No. 10: 122–148. DOI: 10.25990/socinstras.pss-10.414k-p077. (In Russ.)
Meng X., Gregory R. (2005) Intermarriage and the economic assimilation of immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics. No. 23(1): 135–175. DOI: 10.1086/425436.
Meng X., Meurs D. (2006) Intermarriage, language, and economic assimilation process: a case study of France. IZA–Institute for the Study of Labor, Discussion Paper Series. No. 2461.
Mukomel V.I. (2013) Migrant integration policy in Russia: challenges, potential, risks: workbook. Moscow: Spetskniga. (In Russ.)
Mukomel V.I., Grigorieva K.S. (eds) (2022) Adaptation and integration of migrants in Russia: challenges, realities, indicators. Moscow: FNISC RAN, 2022. (In Russ.)
Park R. (1928) Human Migration and the Marginal Man. American Journal of Sociology. No. 33: 881–893.
Portes A., Zhou M. (1993) The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants among Post-1965 Immigrant Youth. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. No. 530: 74–98.
Sigareva E.P., Sivoplyasova S.Yu. (2022) The impact of external migration on marriage and fertility in modern Russia. Nauchnyj rezul’tat. Sociologiya i upravlenie [Research Result. Sociology and management]. No. 8 (1): 68–81. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-1-0-6. (In Russ.)
Sivopliasova S.Yu. (2020) The marriage market of Russia as a component of the international marriage market. SOTIS – social’nye tekhnologii, issledovaniya [SOTIS – social technologies, research]. No. 1: 55–61. (In Russ.)
Sivopliasova S.Yu., Ryazantsev S.V. (2021) Marriage behavior of female migrants from Central Asian countries. Zhenshchina v rossijskom obshchestve. [Woman in Russian Society]. Special issue: 136–149. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2021.0.9. (In Russ.)
Song M. (2009) Is intermarriage a good indicator of integration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. No. 35(2): 331–348. DOI: 10.1080/13691830802586476.
Soroko E.L. (2015) Ethnically mixed families in the Russian Federation. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review]. No. 1(4): 96–123. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v1i4.1804. (In Russ.)
Stonequist E. (1937) The Marginal Man. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Susokolov A.A. (1987) Interethnic marriages in the USSR. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russ.)
van Tubergen F., Maas I. (2007) Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants in the Netherlands: An analysis of population data. Social Science Research. No. 36(3): 1065–1086. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.09.003.