Relationship of Protest Activity with the Social Tension Dynamics in the South-East Asian Countries

Relationship of Protest Activity with the Social Tension Dynamics in the South-East Asian Countries


Basaeva E.K.

Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Head of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, North Ossetian State University named after K.L. Khetagurov, Vladikavkaz, Russia. elena_basaeva@mail.ru

Kamenetsky E.S.

Dr. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Head researcher, Southern Mathematics Institute VSC of RAS, Vladikavkaz, Russia. eskamenetsky@mail.ru

Kagramanyan D.G.

Graduate Student, Southern Mathematics Institute VSC RAS, Vladikavkaz, Russia diisha@mail.ru

ID of the Article:


This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Agreement No. 075-02-2023-939).


For citation:

Basaeva E.K., Kamenetsky E.S., Kagramanyan D.G. Relationship of Protest Activity with the Social Tension Dynamics in the South-East Asian Countries. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 2. P. 75-87




Abstract

The article is devoted to testing the method of forecasting major conflicts in countries of Southeast Asia. The method is based on the assumption of the social tension growth in the last years before the event. Tensions are not definitely linked to protest activity. They contribute to sociopolitical or ethno-political mobilization, which can lead to the destabilization of society. Therefore, with high rates of tension growth in the country, the probability of serious conflicts increases. For a quantitative assessment of the social tension in the countries of Southeast Asia, the most relevant statistical indicator is the suicides number. We assume that the five-year growth rate of the tension indicator (the level of conflict) exceeding a certain threshold value indicates the possibility of major protests. The calculations carried out for the Southeast Asian countries made it possible to estimate the probability of major conflicts with an accuracy close to the machine learning methods. The use of the proposed indicator for the analysis of socio-political processes in the countries of Southeast Asia made it possible to explain their similarities in countries with different economic, demographic, political and cultural characteristics, i.e. obtain additional information characterizing in these countries the stability or conflict risk.


Keywords
conflict forecasting; social tension; indicator of social tension; level of conflict; Southeast Asia

References

Anokhina Y.S. (2012) Chinese Diasporas and new Chinese migration to Southeast Asian countries. Vestnik TomGU [Bulletin of Tomsk State University]. No. 361: 62–65. (In Russ.)

Basaeva E., Kamenetsky E., Khosayeva Z. (2022). Forecast of Socio-Political Instability (the Case of the Arab Spring). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 96–106. (In Russ.)

Beissinger M.R. (2022) The Revolutionary City: Urbanization and the Global Transformation of Rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bektimirova N.N. (2014) Civil protest activity in Cambodia in 2013–2014. Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Aktual Problems of Development]. No. 22: 82–105. (In Russ.)

Buschmann A. (2018) Protest und Demokratisierung in Myanmar: Erste Erkenntnisse aus dem «Myanmar Protest Event Dataset». Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques. Vol. 72. No. 1: 295–304.

Celiku B., Kraay A. (2017) Predicting Conflict. World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper. No. 8075. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2985500 (accessed 26.06.2022).

Durkheim E. (1994) Suicide: A Sociological Etude. Moscow: Myslʹ. (In Russ.)

Fomicheva E.A. (2009) Thailand in 2008–2009. Political crisis overcomed. Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development]. No. 13: 333–352. (In Russ.)

Fomicheva E.A. (2011) Thailand in 2010–2011. From street protests to parliamentary elections. Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development]. No. 17: 266–276. (In Russ.)

Fomicheva E.A. (2012) Thailand: Has the National Reconciliation been Achieved? Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development]. No. 18: 231–243. (In Russ.)

Fomicheva E.A. (2014) Thailand in 2013–2014. From the amnesty bill to coup d’etat. Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development]. No. 23: 49–59. (In Russ.)

Gurr T.R. (2005) Why Men Rebel. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)

Hegre H. et al. (2019) ViEWS: A political violence early-warning system. Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 56. No. (2): 155–174.\

Kanaev E., Demidenko S. (2019) Is the ‘Arab Spring’ Likely in Southeast Asia? Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development]. Vol. 2. No. 3(44): 28–43. (In Russ.)

Kaygorodova M.E. (2020) On the issue of revolutionary events of the 21st century in Asian countries. In: Sistemnyi Monitoring Globalnyh i Regionalnyh Riskov [System monitoring of global and regional risks]. Vol. 11. Part 2. Volgograd: «Uchitel»: 899–918. (In Russ.)

Koldunova E.V. (2015) Political crisis and social protest in Thailand. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [Bulletin of MGIMO University]. No. 4 (43): 222–228. (In Russ.)

KorotaevA.V., Sokovnina E.M., ShadrovaA.O. (2020) Echo of the Arab Spring in Asian countries: experience of quantitative analysis. In: Sistemnyi Monitoring Globalnyh i Regionalnyh Riskov [System monitoring of global and regional risks]. Vol. 11. P. 2: 629–665. (In Russ.)

KuznetsovA.M., Zolotukhin I.N. (2011) Ethnopotical History of the Asia-Pacific in the XX – Beginning of the XXI Centuries: monograph. Vladivostok: DVFU. (In Russ.)

Li Y., Yao H. (2018) Classification of fragile states based on machine learning. MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 173.

Medvedev I.A., Ustyuzhanin V.V., ZhdanovA.I., KorotayevA.V. (2022) Application of machine learning methods to rank factors and predict unarmed and armed revolutionary destabilization in the Afrasian macrozone of instability. Sistemnyi Monitoring Globalnyh i Regionalnyh Riskov [Systemic Monitoring of Global and Regional Risks]. Vol. 13: 131–210. (In Russ.)

Mocci N. (2017) Cambodia 2016–2017: The worsening of social and political conflicts. Asia Maior. Vol. XXVIII: 191–209.

Mohajan H.K. (2018) The Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar are Victim of Genocide! ABC Journal of Advanced Research. Vol. 7. No. 1: 59–72.

Ortiz I., Burke S., Berrada M., Cortés H.S. (2022) World Protests. A Study of Key Protest Issues in the 21st Century. New York: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Petrova O.L. (2020) Features of the Armed Conflicts in Indonesia and the Possibility of a Peaceful Settlement. Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development]. Vol. 3. No. 4(49): 102–115. (In Russ.)

Phan V.Y. Ch. (2019) Foreign direct investments and the current state of the investment climate in Vietnam. Innovacii i investicii [Innovation and investment]. No. 12: 67–71.

Rogozhina N.G. (2012) Thailand: the treating of natural disaster. Yugo-Vostochnaya Azia: aktualnye problemy razvitiya [Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development]. No. 18: 186–193. (In Russ.)

Simonenok A.V., Vitko N.D. (2017) Ethno-territorial conflicts in modern Indochina. Russia and the Pacific. No. 2 (96): 47–48. (In Russ.)

Siu K., Chan A. (2015) Strike Wave in Vietnam, 2006–2011. Journal of Contemporary Asia. Vol. 45. No. 1: 71–91.

SmirnovaA.A. (2007) Southeast Asian countries are the leading investors in Vietnam. Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development. No. 10: 393–398. (In Russ.)

Social protest in the modern East (2016). Ed. by D.V. Streltsov. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Teik Kh.B. (2021) The Profound Impact of the BERSIH Movement since 2007. ISEAS Perspective. Is. 2021. No. 167.

Thu H. (2014) The Anti-Chinese Riots in Vietnam: Responses from the Ground. ISEAS Perspective. No. 32: 1–8.

Tishkov V.A., Stepanov V.V. (2004) Measurement of conflict. Methodology and results of ethno-confessional monitoring of the EAWARN Network in 2003. Moscow: IEA im. Mikluho-Maklaya RAN. (In Russ.)

Tsvetov A. (2019) Southeast Asia 2018–2024: old wounds, new uncertainties. Global forecast 2019–2024. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/2019-southeastasia (accessed 14.08.2023). (In Russ.)

TsvetovA.P., Tsvetov P. Yu. (2018) Public protests in Vietnam: the maturation of civil society or the prologue for a «color revolution»? V’etnamskie issledovaniya [The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies]. Ser. 2. No. 3: 5–17. (In Russ.)

Vnukova L.B., Chelpanova D.D., Pashenko I.V. (2014) Socio-political tension in a multi-ethnic region. Rostovon-Don: YuNTs RAN. (In Russ.)

Wischermann J., Dang T.V.P., Sirait G.M. (2023) The State in a Capitalist Society: Protests and State Reactions in Vietnam and Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia. Vol. 53. No. 2: 185–206.

YurevichA.V., Ushakov D.V., Tsapenko I.P. (2009) Quantitative estimation of macropsychological condition of modern russian society. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. No. 2 (4): 1–18. (In Russ.)

Content No 2, 2024