Change of Generations: Essence and Reality (Ontological Point of View)

Change of Generations:
Essence and Reality (Ontological Point of View)


Shchelkin A.G.

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., leading researcher of the Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia evropa.ru@gmail.com

ID of the Article:


For citation:

Shchelkin A.G. Change of Generations: Essence and Reality (Ontological Point of View). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 2. P. 135-145




Abstract

The ontological interpretation of the phenomenon of “changing generations” is fundamentally different from the current understanding of “change of generations”. The ontological approach presupposes an answer to the most important question: to what extent does the “generation” represented in reality correspond to its “nature”, its “essence”, its “definition”. Hence, until recently, we observed precisely the “qualitative”, “essential” classification of generations – “lost generation”, “great generation”, “silent generation”, “baby boomers”, “Buddenbroks dynamics”, “Jefferson formula”. Today’s anonymous numbering of generations is X, Y, Z, Alfa, Beta, Gamma etc.– does not imply such a goal. Today’s (postmodern) vision is focused rather on the “digital-centricity” and “computer competence/familiarity” of new generations. From an ontological point of view, it is important to see to what extent in reality this or that generation reflects not so much itself as the “spirit of the times”, to what extent it is a “significant generation”, expresses a “needed future”, to what extent it contains the social pathos of “solidarism”, “humanitarian” and “civilizational” characteristics of human society. The “mental crisis” may be that the acquisition of “digital virtues” will be purchased at the price of an unacceptable ontological loss. “Homo non vult esse nisi homo.” – A person does not want to be anything other than a person (Nikolai Kuzansky). Ontological “definition” in this sense seems to hold every social “thing” in its “essential”, “programmatic” certainty. The conclusion suggests itself. An ontological view of the phenomenon of “new generations” can play the role of “methodological resistance” to the “digital reductionism” into which the human existence of “new” generations can easily plunge.


Keywords
generational change; ontology; “significant generation”; postmodern; “spirit of the times”; “synchronists”

References

Feuer L.S. (1969) The Conflict of Generations: The Character and Significance of Student Movements. Basic Books.

Ignatova T.V. (2005) Continuity and conflict of generations. Obrazovaniye i obshchestvo: nauch., inform.-analit. zhurn. [Education and society: scientific, information and analytical journal]. No. 3. URL: http://www.jeducation.ru/3_2005/100.html (accessed 06.06.2016). (In Russ.)

Jaspers K. (1991) Smysl i naznacheniye istorii [The meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)

Lifshits M. (2003) Dialogue with Evald Ilyenkov. Moscow: Progress – Traditsiya. (In Russ.)

Marx K., Engels F. (1956) Iz rannikh proizvedeniy [From early works]. Moscow: IPL. (In Russ.)

Shanin T. (2005) History of generations and generational history. Fathers and Sons. Generational analysis of modern Russia. Comp. by Yu. Levada, T. Shanin. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)

Shestov L. (1971) Apofeoz bespochvennosti [Apotheosis of groundlessness]. Paris: YMCA-PRESS. (In Russ.)

Sorokin P. (1950) Altruistic Love. Boston: The Beacon Press.

Content No 2, 2024