The Potential for the Development of Research and Pedagogical Stаff: a Sociological Perspective

The Potential for the Development of Research and Pedagogical Stаff:
a Sociological Perspective


Zborovsky G.Е.

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia garoldzborovsky@gmail.com

ID of the Article:


The research was carried out at the expense of a grant from the RSF No. 23-28-00028.


For citation:

Zborovsky G.Е. The Potential for the Development of Research and Pedagogical Stаff: a Sociological Perspective. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 3. P. 94-105



Abstract

The article examines the main quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the university social community of research and pedagogical stuff (RPS) from the point of view of both the trends that took place at the beginning of the XXI century and the current trends, as well as the ways of long-term development of this category of intellectual labor specialists. It is proved that further improvement of higher education in the country is impossible without the active participation in this process of the flagship of university progress – RPS. In order to identify the prospects of this community, the solution of the fundamental tasks of developing its potential is considered. The article proposes a Pyramid of factors of influence on the RPS, driven by four social actors – the presidential administration (level of megafactors), the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation (level of macrofactors), regional authorities and local governments (level of mesofactors), university administration (level of microfactors). All the considered solutions of the regulators of different levels, in the author’s opinion, have a strategic importance for the development of the RPS potential.


Keywords
research and pedagogical stuff (RPS); RPS development potential; quantitative characteristics of RPS development; qualitative characteristics of RPS development; Factors influencing RPS; megafactors; macrofactors; mesofactors; microfactors of influence; strategic decisions on the development of RPS

References

Alaverdov A.R. (2019) Faculty Publication Activity and Resources for its Increase. Vysshee obrasovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. Vol. 28. No. 2: 23–36. (In Russ.)

Gorshkov M.K., Sheregi F.E., Tyurina I.O. (2023) Reproduction of intellectual labor specialists: a sociological analysis. Moscow: FNISC RAS. (In Russ.)

Efimova G.Z. (2021) Barriers to Academic Career Development for University Teachers. Universitetskij menedzhment: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. Vol. 25. No. 4: 55–74. (In Russ.)

Zborovsky G.E., Ambarova P.A. (2022) Resource mobilization of the scientific and pedagogical community (case of higher education in the Ural Federal District). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 60–71. (In Russ.)

Zborovsky G.E., Ambarova P.A. (2018) Universities that can change themselves and the microregion. In: Reforming Russia: yearbook. Vol. 16. Moscow: Novy Chronograph: 373–392. (In Russ.)

Indicators of science: 2007. Statistical collection. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.)

Education indicators: 2013. Statistical collection. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.)

Education indicators: 2021. Statistical collection. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.)

Education indicators: 2022. Statistical collection. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.)

Changes in strategies, motivations and economic behavior of students and teachers of Russian universities.The newsletter (2019). Moscow: HSE. (Monitoring the Economics of education; No. 1 (133)). (In Russ.)

Kuzminov Ya.I., Yudkevich M.M. (2021) Universities in Russia: how it works. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.)

Education in the Russian Federation: 2012. Statistical collection. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.)

Platonova D.P., Nikiforova N. Yu. (2022) Internal management of Russian universities: the view of practitioners in a changing environment: newsletter. Moscow: HSE. (Monitoring the economics of education; No. 4 (21)). (In Russ.)

Rudakov V.N. (2020) Differences in the position of the teaching staff of universities by age groups. Monitoring jekonomiki obrazovanija [Monitoring the economics of education]. No. 1: 1–6. (In Russ.)

Samsonova E.A. (2022) Sociological Factors of the Influence of the Educational Environment on the Professional Burnout of University Teachers. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 13. No. 3: 179–192. (In Russ.)

Seliverstova N.А. (2020) Simulation of Educational Practices in the System of Higher Education. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 71–77. (In Russ.)

Sotnikova I.S. (2018) New contour of assessment of competitiveness of scientific and pedagogical workers: independent assessment of qualification. Universitetskij menedzhment: praktika i analiz [University management: practice and analysis]. Vol. 22. No. 3: 113–126. (In Russ.)

Pugach V.F. (2023) One more time about the age of teachers in russian universities: old problems and new trends. Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32. No. 3: 118–133. (In Russ.)

Yurevich M.A., Erkina D.S. (2017) «Publication rally»: direct threat or opportunity for scientific community? Sociology of Science and Technology. Vol. 8. No. 2: 104–117. (In Russ.)

Content No 3, 2024