Methodology of the Comparative Sociology of Trust (Case Study of Russia and China)

Methodology of the Comparative Sociology of Trust (Case Study of Russia and China)


Jin Junkai

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Associated Prof., Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China jjk@sxu.edu.cn

Veselov Yu.V.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Head of the Economic Sociology Department, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia. y.veselov@spbu.ru

Skvortsov N.G.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Dean of the Faculty of Sociology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia. n.skvortsov@spbu.ru

ID of the Article: 10024


For citation:

Jin Junkai, Veselov Yu.V., Skvortsov N.G. Methodology of the Comparative Sociology of Trust (Case Study of Russia and China). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 4. P. 3-13



Abstract

The article deals with the methodological issues of the comparative sociology of trust. In order to compare the level of trust in different countries a set of indicators is proposed (generalized trust; particularized trust; trust radius; institutional trust). The problems of measuring generalized and institutional trust in China and Russia are revealed. Based on World Values Survey data, a comparative analysis of trust levels in the Russian Federation and China is carried out. The authors also present data from their own empirical study of trust (telephone survey of the population in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast; Internet study of trust, in-depth interviews of both residents of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China). To explain the processes of transformation of trust in the Russian Federation and China, a modernization approach is used and the role of a culture of trust is revealed. China has a high level of both generalized and institutionalized trust based on its own specific culture of trust. But the radius of trust is narrow and indicators of out-group trust are extremely low. In Russia, the level of generalized trust is low, but the level of institutional trust is average, radius of trust is wider and the level of out-group trust is higher. Particularized trust is approximately the same in China and Russia; at least, we have not identified any special “familistic culture of trust”.


Keywords
trust; social trust; measurement of trust; generalized and particularized trust; institutional trust; culture of trust

References

Bauer P.C. (2015) Negative Experiences and Trust: A Causal Analysis of the Effects of Victimization on Generalized Trust. European Sociological Review. No. 4(31): 397–417.

Bauer P.C., Freitag M. (2018) Measuring Trust. In: Uslaner E. ed. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political. Oxford: Oxford Editors: 15–36.

Delhey J., Welzel Ch., Kenneth N. (2011) How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem. American Sociological Review. No. 5(76): 786–807.

Durkheim E. (1995) Sociology. Its Subject Matter, Method, Mission. Moscow: Kanon. (In Russ.)

Fukuyama F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.

Fukuyama F. (2001) Social Capital, Civil Society and Development. Third World Quarterly. No. 1(22): 7–20.

Hu A. (2017) Radius of Trust: Gradient-Based Conceptualization and Measurement. Social Science Research. Vol. 68: 147–162. DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.08.004.

Ivanov A.V., Danilov S.A. (2014) Social Trust and Institutional Order in Socio-Cultural Context of Western and Eastern Cultures: Comparative Analysis. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya [Basic Researches]. No. 11: 1852–1859. (In Russ.)

Kertman G.L. (2006) Interpersonal Trust in Russia. Socialnaya Realnost [Social Reality]. No. 4: 7–24. (In Russ.)

Knack S., Keefer Ph. (1997) Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 4(112): 1251–1288.

Kupreichenko A.B., Mersiyanova I.V. (2013) Culture of Trust and Distrust of the Civil Society. In: Rozhdestvenskaya M.S. (ed.) Trust and Distrust in the Context of the Development of the Civil Society. Moscow: NIU VSHE: 5–25. (In Russ.)

Latov Yu.V. (2010) What is the Social Capital of Contemporary Russia (Comparative Analysis of the Interpersonal and Institutional Trust. “Leontieff’s Readings” (Electronic Journal). No. 7. URL: http://uisrussia.msu.ru/docs/nov/leontief/2010/Latov.pdf (In Russ.)

Li W., Liang Y. (2002) Particularized Trust and Generalized Trust: The Structure and Nature of Chinese People’s Trust. Shehuixue Yanjiu (Sociological Research). No. 2: 11–22. (In Chinese)

Lundmark S., Gilljam M., Dahlberg S. (2016) Measuring Generalized Trust: An Examination of Question Wording and the Number of Scale Points. Public Opinion Quarterly. No. 1 (80): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv042.

Middle Income Groups in Russia and China: Status, Dynamics and Attitudes. (2018) Ed by M.K. Gorshkov, Li Peilin et al. Moscow: Novyy Chronograph. (In Russ.)

Noelle-Neumann E. (1978) Polls in the mass society: Introduction to the methods of demoscopy. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

Ozono H. (2018) The Mystery of the Difference in the Level of General Trust in China and Japan. PSYCHOLOGIA. Vol. 61. No. 2: 89–103.

Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Romahkina G.F., Davydenko V.A., Ushakova Yu.V. (2018) Generalized Trust: Conceptualization and Measurement. Vestnik SPbGU. Sociologiya [Herald of St. Petersburg University. Sociology]. Vol. 11. No. 4: 464–486. DOI:10.21638/spbu12.2018.406. (In Russ.)

Rykavishnikov V.O. (2008) Interpersonal Trust and Cross-Country comparisons. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 17–25 (In Russ.)

Ryzhova S.V. (2019) Trust and Ethnic Predispositions as An Elements of the Regional Social Capital. Sociologicheskaya nayka i socialnaya practica [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. No. 2(7): 81–98. (In Russ.)

Sasaki M. (2013) Parental Socialization and Experience of Betrayal: A Cross-National Analysis of Trust. In: Trust in Society, Business and Organization. Ed. by N.I. Dryalkhlow et al. Moscow: Cogito-Centre-ISRAS Publishing House: 9–31.

Schrader H. (2004) Trust and Social Transformation: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings from Russia (Gesellschaftliche Transformationen/Societal Transformations). Munchen: LIT Verlag.

Steinhardt C. (2012) How Is High Trust in China Possible? Comparing the Origins of Generalized Trust in Three Chinese Societies. Political Studies. No. 60(2): 434–454. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00909.x.

Trust in the Digital World. (2023) Ed. by Yu. Veselov. Moscow: IPR Media. (In Russ.)

Uslaner E. (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Uslaner E. (2009) Corruption, Inequality, and Trust. In: The Handbook on Social Capital. Ed. by G.T. Svendsen, G.L.H. Svendsen. London: Edward Elgar: 127–143.

Uslaner E. (2012) Measuring Generalized Trust: In Defense of the ‘Standard’ Question. In: Handbook of  Research Methods on Trust. Ed. by F. Lyon, G. Möllering, M. Saunders. London: Edward Elgar: 72–82.

Yang G., Zeng S. (2016) The Comparison of Trust Structure between Urban and Rural Residents in China. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management. No. 6: 665–673.

 

Content No 4, 2024