printTrends and Social Reasons of Living Alone
Gurko T.A.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology FCTAS of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia tgurko@yandex.ru
Gurko T.A. Trends and Social Reasons of Living Alone. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 5. P. 113-127
In connection with the global trend of the spreading one-person households, the basic concepts and directions of studying loneliness are analyzed. The empirical base is the data from the censuses of 2002, 2010, 2021, Statistical Survey of Income and Participation in Social Programs‑2022 and Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey – Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE, 2009, 2021 and 2022), foreign studies results on the problems of single households and loneliness. The reasons for the spread of single households can be considered as an increase in life expectancy, developing social security system, urbanization, economic independence of women and adult children, nuclearization of families, decreasing levels of marriage and fertility, internal and external migration, spreading individualism values, self-realization and tolerance to various lifestyles. In Russia, the share of households consisting of one person in cities among other private households is doubling from 2002 to 2021 to amount to 43,8%. Against the background of data on developed countries, the indicator is high, which may be due to a different calculating methodology. The proportion of working-age people living in single households in cities has also increased from 46,9% to 59,6%. Such changes were probably facilitated by economic independence of adult children from their parents, an increase in the age of family formation and childbirth, and the practices of intimate and marital relations in different households. According to the RLMS-HSE data there are more men living in one-person households in young and middle age while for women these ages are older. At the age of 36–59, there are almost twice as many people living without partners who are dissatisfied with life and have nervous disorders or depression compared to spouses in the same age. There are no differences in indicators such as smoking, alcohol consumption, assessment of health and financial situation. There are fewer satisfied cohabitees among women, but not among male cohabitees, who are probably more likely to be satisfied with a situation without obligations. The absence of children can be considered one of the criteria for the empirical identification of single people. At the age of 60 and older, 8% of men and 9% of women in cities did not have native or officially adopted children. The indicators of well-being of those who have and do not have natives or officially adopted children were compared. There were no differences in indicators such as smoking, alcohol consumption, health and financial status assessment. The absence of natives or officially adopted children aged 60 years and more has a negative impact mainly on women’s life satisfaction. The trend of living in one-person households, including those in working ages, is likely to persist in Russia. From the point of view of fertility, a low level of final celibacy for men and women and the low rate of women’s childlessness in comparison with developed countries are encouraging so far. A high divorce rate is partially offset by remarriages. Cohabitation is rather not an alternative to marriage, at least among educated groups of the population, but only a stage in life for a balanced choice of a partner.
Apostolou M., Wang Y. (2019) The Association Between Mating Performance, Marital Status, and the Length of Singlehood: Evidence From Greece and China. Evolutionary Psychology. Vol. 17. No. 4. DOI: 10.1177/1474704919887706.
Artamonova A.V. (2018) Changes in Family Formation Trajectories Among Russians and Factors for such Changes. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 24. No. 2: 110–134. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.2.5847. (In Russ.)
Bergström M., Brée S. (2023) Not a Single Meaning: Definition and Evolution of Singlehood in France and the United States. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 465–484. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12519.
Brown A. (2020) A Profile of Single Americans. Pew Research Center’s Social and Demographic Trends Project. URL: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/ (accessed 12.11.2023).
Cherepukhin Y.M. (1995) Social Problems of Male Loneliness in a Large City. Abstract … Cand. of Soc. Sci. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Cheung A., Yeung W. (2021) Socioeconomic Development and Young Adults’ Propensity of Living in One-person Households. Demographic Research. Vol. 44. Article 11: 277–306. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.11
Choi K.H., Qian Y. (2023) The Rise of the Childless Single in South Korea. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 526–541. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12507.
Cohen P.N. (2021) The Rise of One-person Households. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. Vol. 7: 1–3. DOI: 10.1177/23780231211062315.
Delafontaine H., van Gasse D., Mortelmans D. (2023) Navigating the Theoretical Landscape of Loneliness Research: How Interdisciplinary Synergy Contributes to Further Conceptualizations. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 1: 11–37. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12492.
DePaulo B. (2023) Single and Flourishing: Transcending the Deficit Narratives of Single Life. Journal of Family Theory and Review. 2023. Vol. 15. No. 3: 389–411. DOI:10.1111/jftr.12525.
Dictionary of the Latest Sociological Vocabulary with English Equivalents. (2019) General ed. by S.A. Kravchenko. Moscow: MGIMO Universitet. (In Russ.)
Dommaraju P. (2015) One-person Households in India. Demographic Research. Vol. 32. Article. 45: 1239–1266. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.45.
Ermer A.E., Keenoy J.E. (2023) Singlehood During Later Life: Theoretical Considerations for Health and Social Relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 595–613. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12524.
Esteve A., Reher D.S., et al. (2020) Living Alone Over the Life Course: Cross-National Variations on an Emerging Issue. Population and Development Review. Vol. 46. No. 1: 169–189. DOI: 10.1111/padr.12311.
Fitzpatrick J. (2023) Voluntary and Involuntary Singlehood: Salience of Concepts from Four Theories. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 506–525. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12526.
Gurko T.A., Matskovsky M.S. (1989) Single Man in a City. In: Matskovsky M.S., Gurko T.A. (eds). Formation of Marriage and the Family. Moscow: IS AN SSSR: 7–24. (In Russ.)
Gurko T.A. (2021) Evolution and Transformation of the Institution of Marriage: Analysis of Empirical Indicators. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 58–69. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014117-1. (In Russ.)
Isupova O.G. (2015) Russian Consensual Unions in the Early XXI Century (Based on the International Comparative Study Data). Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 2 (125): 153–164. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2015.2.10. (In Russ.)
Kislev E., Marsh K. (2023) Intersectionality in Studying and Theorizing Singlehood. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 412–427. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12522.
Kon I.S. (2008) 80 Years of Singlehood. Moscow: Vremya. (In Russ.)
Lavender-Stott E.S., Guzzo K.B. et al. (2023) Kaleidoscopic Perspectives on Theorizing Singlehood. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 379–388. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12532.
Lavender-Stott E.S. (2023) Queering singlehood: Examining the intersection of sexuality and relationship status from a queer lens. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 428–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12521.
Luke N., Poulin M. (2023) Sex and Single Women in Midlife: Theoretical Perspectives, Recent Findings and Future Directions. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 578–594. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12518.
Mortelmans D., Claessens E., Thielemans G. (2023) Defining and Measuring Singlehood in Family Studies. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 485–505. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12520.
Palós A., Kashyap R. et al. (2020) Demographic change and increasing late singlehood in East Asia, 2010–2050. Demographic Research. 2020. Vol. 43: 1367–1398. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.46
Perlman D., Peplo L.E. (1989) Theoretical Approaches to Loneliness. In: Labyrinths of Loneliness. Transl. from Eng., ed. by N.E. Pokrovsky. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
Pokrovsky N.E., Ivanchenko G.V. (2008) The Universe of Loneliness: Sociological and Psychological Essays.Moscow: Logos. (In Russ.)
Puzanova Z.V. (2008) Aloneness: the Potential of Empirical Research. Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Sociologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. No. 4: 28–38. (In Russ.)
Qu L., de Vaus D. (2015) Living Alone and Personal Wellbeing. Australian Family Trends. No. 10. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies: 4–11.
Raymo J. (2015) Living alone in Japan: Relationships With Happiness and Health. Demographic Research. Vol. 32. Article 46: 1267–1298. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.46.
Romanova N.P. (2006) The Social Status of Single Women in Modern Russian Society: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis: Based on the Materials of Transbaikalia. Abstract of the Dissertation of the Doctor of Sociological Sciences. Ulan-Ude. (In Russ.)
Seidenberg R. (1989) Single Marriage in Corporate America. In: Labyrinths of Loneliness. Transl. from Eng., ed by N.E. Pokrovsky. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
Setyonaluri D., Maghfirah A., Aryaputra C. (2020). Norms in Transition? The Relationship between Education and Singlehood. Jurnal Studi Pemuda. Vol. 9. No. 2: 136–148. DOI: 10.22146/studipemudaugm.57995.
Teerawichitchainan B., Knodel J., Pothisiri W. (2015) What Does Living Alone Really Mean for Older Persons? A Comparative Study of Myanmar, Vietnam, and Thailand. Demographic Research. Vol. 32. Art. 48: 1329–1360. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.48.
Tessler H. (2023) The stability of Singlehood: Limitations of the Relationship Status Paradigm and a New Theoretical Framework for Reimagining Singlehood. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 444–464. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12506.
Two in Society: An Intimate Couple in the Modern World. (2020) Ed. by I.V. Lomakin. Moscow: WCIOM. (In Russ.)
de Vaus D., Qu L. (2015) Demographics of Living Alone. Australian Family Trends. No. 6. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Yeung W., Cheung A. (2015) Living Alone: One-person Households in Asia. Demographic Research. Vol. 32. Art. 40: 1099–1112. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.40.
Yoshida A. (2023) Anomie, Gender, and Inequality: Developing Sociological Theory of Singlehood from Japanese Experiences. Journal of Family Theory and Review. Vol. 15. No. 3: 542–561. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12493.