printDisenchanting the Western Mainstream
Martianov V.S.
Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Director of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of UB RAS, Russia, Ekaterinburg, Russia martianov@instlaw.uran.ru
The article was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 23-18-00427.
Martianov V.S. Disenchanting the Western Mainstream. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 6. P. 53-64
The changing global social ontology entails an inevitable transformation of the normative model for self-description of modern society in social sciences. As diverse limits to growth are reached (capacity of global markets, demography, ecology, mass employment, etc.), the search for and legitimation of alternative social hierarchies and principles of resource distribution is actualised complicated by the stagnant humanity’s resource base and the appropriation of intellectual rents and infrastructural (technological, military, economic) advantages by an increasingly insignificant minority. These background tendencies lead to a) an inevitable transformation of dominant perceptions of what constitutes social, economic, political norms and b) an increasingly critical reception of normative selfdescriptions of Western societies, which previously, due to the unconditional dominance of the West, were offered as the ideal of social organisation for all others. The alternative to the Western mainstream is increasingly centered around notions and concepts that describe a future beyond the ideologically loaded and increasingly irrelevant models of liberal democracies and self-regulated markets, which have been controversially and very limitedly realized in the historical practice of Western societies. The global debate on universal social norms is driven by a renewed socio-political and economic context that universally registers for most citizens the inequalities and injustices of the de facto oligopoly markets and elitist democracies that encompass all modern societies. The disenchantment (M. Weber) of the narrative of liberal-market democracies is confirmed by the global rise of nationalisms, protectionism, populism, the widespread contraction of the welfare state and the uprisings of various minorities, including in Western countries, revealing an increasing divergence between social theory, ideology and ontology at the base of the end of history, which turned out only to be its new, post-Western turn.
Boltanski L., Theveno L. (2013) Critique and Justification of Justice: An Essays on the Sociology of Worlds. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)
Chang H.D. (2018) The Evil Samaritans. The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of the Capitalism. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber. (In Russ.)
Clement K. (2018) What is the problem with authoritarianism? Neprikosnovennyj zapas [Emergency rations]. No. 5: 76–88. (In Russ.)
Coase R. (1995) The Nature of the Firm. In: The Theory of the Company. Ed. by V.M. Galperin. St. Petersburg: Ekonom. shkola: 11–32. (In Russ.)
Efimov V.M. (2014) How Capitalism, University and Mathematics formed the main direction of the Economic discipline. Nauchny ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN [Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of UB RAS]. Vol. 14. No. 2: 5–51. (In Russ.)
Fishman L.G., Martianov V.S., Davydov D.A. (2019) The Rent Society: in the Shadow of Labor, Capital and Democracy. Moscow: VShE. (In Russ.)
Ivanov V.G. (2015) «Charts power» – «Rating power» as a Tool of Soft Power and economic Weapon: Technologies of use and counteraction Strategies. Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russ.)
Jameson F. (1971) Towards Dialectical Criticism. In: Marxism and Form: Twentieth Century Dialectical Theories of Literature. NJ: Princeton University Press: 306–417.
Manheim K. (1994) The Ideology and Utopia. In: The Diagnosis of Our Time. Moscow: Yurist: (In Russ.)
Martianov V.S. (2003) The Metalanguage of the Political Science. Yekaterinburg: UrO RAN. (In Russ.)
McCloskey D. (2015) The Rhetoric of Economic Science. Moscow: In-t Gajdara. (In Russ.)
Naumkin V.V. (2020) The Model of the Non-West: is there a State-Civilization? POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis: Political Studies]. No. 4: 78–93. (In Rus.)
Piketty T. (2016) Capital in the XXI Century. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russ.)
Poskett J. (2024) The Non-Western History of Science. Discoveries that We didn’t know about. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher. (In Russ.)
Precarious employment: Origins, Criteria, Features (2021). Ed. By Zh.T. Toshchenko. Moscow: Ves mir. (In Russ.)
Quiggin J. (2016) The Zombie Economy. How Dead Ideas Сontinue to Wander Among Us. Moscow: VShE. (In Russ.)
Reckwitz A. (2020) The Society of Singularities. Cambridge; МА: Polity.
Reinert E.S. (2011) How Rich Countries Became Rich, and why Poor Countries Remain Poor. Moscow: VShE. (In Russ.)
Shapiro I. (2011) The Escape from Reality in the Humanities. Moscow: VShE. (In Russ.)
Smith J. (2017) The Global South in the Global Crisis. Journal of Labor and Society. No. 2: 161–184.
Sokolov M., Titaev K. (2013) The Provincial and Native Science. Antropologicheskij forum [Anthropological Forum]. No. 19: 239–275. (In Russ.)
Spiridonova V.I. (2022) The Contours of a Multicivilizational World. Problemy civilizacionnogo razvitiya [Problems of civilizational development]. Vol. 4. No. 2: 5–32. (In Russ.)
Tsygankov A.P. (2022) The Global Conflict of Late Modernity: Logic and Limits of the Escalation. Rossiya v global’noj politike [Russia in Global Politics]. Vol. 20. No. 6: 10–21. (In Russ.)
Wallerstein I. (2016) The World is a Modern system. Volume IV. The Triumph of Centrist Liberalism, 1789. Moscow: RFSON. (In Russ.)
Yurchak A. (2014) It was Forever, until it was Over. The Last Soviet Generation. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)