The Phenomenon of Resentment: Historical Allusion or Harsh Reality?

The Phenomenon of Resentment:
Historical Allusion or Harsh Reality?


Roy O.M.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Leading Researcher at the Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia roi_omsk@mail.ru

ID of the Article: 10180


For citation:

Roy O.M. The Phenomenon of Resentment: Historical Allusion or Harsh Reality?. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 8. P. 167-174



Abstract

The article examines evolution and content of the resentment phenomenon. According to the theory of F. Nietzsche, resentment is the feeling experienced by a person towards his enemy or towards the one whom he considers guilty of his failures, which causes his aggression towards another. L. Fishman traces various historical forms of resentment, drawing attention to the fact that the main subject of resentment actions is often not the plebeian, but bearers of the values of the ruling class. Under these conditions, resentment becomes the most important instrument of political struggle, the subject of appeal from one social force to another. Thus, the author studied the phenomenon of resentment from another perspective than the founders of this concept, F. Nietzsche and M. Scheler. Нe treats it as a type of false consciousness, and the concept of resentment in its original form as its criticism from the right. In the modern world, the phenomenon of resentment is embodied in a wide variety of forms – from the precariat to confrontation between states. And as long as there is a division of society into the strong and the weak in the world, social inequality, double standards, resentment will find favorable soil.


Keywords
resentment; social order; master class; slave class; social inequality; precariat

References

Bresler M. G. (2023) Cognitariat. Specifics of formation and development prospects in Russia. Diskurs- Pi [Discourse- Pi]. T. 20. No. 4: 65–81. (In Russ.)

Golenkova Z. T. Goliusova Yu.V. (2015) Precariat as a new group of hired workers. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living standards of the population of Russian regions]. No. 1(195): 47–57. (In Russ.)

Piketty T. (2015) Capital in the XXI century. Moskow: Ad Marginem. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh. T. (2021) Public and private life world of the precariat: main features and guidelines. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. [Sociological studies]. No. 11: 24–36. (In Russ.)

Milanovic B. (2023) Visions of inequality From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War. Harvard University Press.

Content No 8, 2024