printHistorical Memories of Russians Today (history of the XX century Russia in the optics of families’ stories)
Gorshkov M.K.
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Academician of RAS, Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Director of Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. director@isras.ru
Barash R.E.
Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Leading Researcher of Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. raisabarash@gmail.com
The research was supported by the RSF, project No. 20-18-00505 (supervisor – M. K. Gorshkov, Academician of RAS).
Gorshkov M.K., Barash R.E. Historical Memories of Russians Today (history of the XX century Russia in the optics of families’ stories). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 9. P. 125-137
Referring to the data of long-term sociological research by the Federal Scientific Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the author studies how the historical memory in contemporary Russian society is forming under the influence of the discursive politicization of the national past. The purpose of the article is to study either the images of the recent national past that are rooted in the mass consciousness of Russians being the basis of collective identity, or the changes in attitudes towards the past under the influence of the state rhetoric “historization”. The realization of the scientific purpose involves to solve some research tasks: to study the dynamics of respondents’ interest in the state’s past when political leaders used to apply to historical memory, to analyze what people in Russia think about historical truth, about the ways and the actors of its protection. Under the contemporary political context, when the past and history become tools of political competition, many persons in Russia, for whom the Soviet heritage is the foundation of national identity and family memory, support the idea of the need to protect the socially accepted interpretation of Russian history. In 2020’th the majority of the respondents (37%) claimed the need to react harshly to the distorted interpretation of some events in Russian history when whey answered the question “How should Russia react to the false interpretation of certain historical events in some Western countries?”. The historical truth is considered by the Russia’s citizens as a universal interpretation of historical events, so the majority (48%) claims it is necessary to protect historical memory by the preservation of those interpretations of the historical events, that are admitted by the society. Supporting the idea that historical truth should be protected, Russian citizens rather support harsh political statements and defensive foreign policy discourse than demonstrate real involvement into historical context, their own daily interest in protecting accepted interpretations of the past and personal concern about their correctness. In 2022 less than a third of the respondents (29%) considered the ordinary citizens should protect the historical truth, while the majority claimed the state’s leadership (67%), professional historians (49%) and social scientists (38%) should defend national historical memory.
Achkasov V. A. (2013) «The politics of Memory» as a tool for building post-socialist nations. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. 16. No. 4(20): 106–123. (In Russ.)
Achkasov V. A. (2018) National identity as a historical narrative. Managerial consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsultirovanie]. No 10: 19–26. (In Russ.)
Alekseev A. (2008) Family and Historical Memory: Points of Intersection and Gaps (Hypothesis on the Influence of Family Memory on the World’s Perception). Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovanij [Telescope: Journal of Sociological and Marketing Research]. No. 5: 4950. (In Russ.)
Assmann J. (2004) Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Moscow: YaSK. (In Russ.)
Barash R. E. (2017) Some of the Reasons for “Soviet” Nostalgia and Features of the Historical Memory of Russians about the Soviet Period. Sotsiologicheskaja nauka i sotsialnaja praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. Vol. 5. No. 4: 124–151. (In Russ.)
Becker M. (2018) “History as Argument” as the Poor Relative in Modern Historical- Political Research: State of the Art and a Proposal for a New Approach. In: History and Politics (Copernicus Graduate School Studies (CGS Studies). Ed. by K. Kcka, R. Schattkowsky. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Edelman M. (1977) Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. London: Academic Press.
Efremenko D. V. (2022) Memory as a casus belli. Rossiya v global’noy politike [Russia in global politics]. Vol. 20. No. 6. P. 119–141. (In Russ.)
Gudkov L. (2005) “Memory” of the war and the mass identity of Russians. In: Memory of the war 60 years later: Russia, Germany, Europe. Ed. by M. E. Gabovich. Moscow: NLO: 83–103. (In Russ.)
Hirsch M. (2021) The Post- Memory Generation: Writing and Visual Culture after the Holocaust. New Publishing House.
Historical Consciousness of Russians: Assessments of the Past, Memory, Symbols (Experience of Sociological Measurement). (2022) Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow: Ves’ Mir. (In Russ.)
Historical memory is another space where political problems are solved. (2020) Russia in Global Affairs. Vol. 18. No. 1: 59–80. (In Russ.)
Kasyanov G. V. (2019) Ukraine and its neighbors: the historical politics. 1987–2018. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)
Khapaeva D. «Triumphant Memory of the Perpetrators: Putin’s Politics of Re- Stalinization». Communist and Post- Communist Studies. 2016. Vol. 49. No. 1: 61–73.
Koposov N. (2011) The strict regime memory: history and politics in Russia. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)
Kurilla I. (2021) History as a Language of Politics. Novoe proshloe [The New Past]. No. 1: 104–126. (In Russ.)
Latov Yu.V. (2018) Paradoxes of modern Russians’ perception of Russia during the times of L. I. Brezhnev, B. N. Yeltsin and V. V. Putin. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political studies]. No. 5: 116–133. (In Russ.)
Letnyakov D. E. (2023) Historical memory of Russian society: towards the construction of an agonistic model. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. Vol. 32. No. 1: 109–129. (In Russ.)
Lowenthal D. (2004) The Past Is a Foreign Country. St. Petersburg: Russkij Ostrov. (In Russ.)
Malinova O. Yu. (2011) The theme of the past in the rhetoric of Russian presidents. Pro et Contra. No. 3–4 (52): 106–122. (In Russ.)
Malinova O. Yu. (2014) Official rhetoric and the construction of the national past: analysis of the thematic repertoire of memorable speeches of the presidents of the Russian Federation (2000–2013). In: Power and Elites. Ed. by A. V. Duka. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Inter Socis: 224–246. (In Russ.)
Mälksoo M. (2015) “Memory Must Be Defended”: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security. Security Dialogue. Vol. 46. No. 3: 221–237.
Miller A. I. (2016) The politics of memory in post-communist Europe and its impact on the European culture of memory. Politiya [Polity]. No. 1 (80): 111–112. (In Russ.)
Nora P. (1984) Entre Mémoire et Histoire. La problématique des lieux. In: Les lieux de mémoire. Т. 1. Paris: XV–XLII.
Nora P., Ozuf M. et al. (1999) France- memory. St. Petersburg: SPbGU. (In Russ.)
Past for the present: History- memory and narratives of national identity (2020). Ed. by L. P. Repina. Moscow: Aquilon. (In Russ.)
Racinskas R. (2008) Historical Justice for Europe: Why, When And How? In: Crimes Committed by Totalitarian
Regimes. Ed. by P. Jambrek. Ljubljana: Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union: 13–19.
Repina L. P. (2021) Symbols of the past and the “meeting of cultures” in the paradigm of the history of memory. In: Anthropology and ethnology: modern view: collection of articles. Ed. by A. V. Golovnev, E.-B.M. Guchinova. Moscow: Polit. encyclopedia: 361–373. (In Russ.)
Yudin G. B., Khlevnyuk D. O. et al. (2017) What Kind of Past Does the Future of Russia Need? Analytical Report on Sociological Research in the Framework of the Report of the Free Historical Society. Moscow: KGI. (In Russ.)