Creative economy: how loss of knowledge could be stopped

Creative economy:
how loss of knowledge could be stopped


Pavlov M. Yu.

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 1tm@mail.ru

ID of the Article: 7110

Rubric: Discussion. Polemics

For citation:

Pavlov M. Yu. Creative economy: how loss of knowledge could be stopped. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2018. No 3. P. 144-148


 Full Text.


Abstract

The author argues that private intellectual property (PIP) refusal and ownership by everybody of everything can be very useful not only for society in general, but also for private owners. G. Snowden’s and J. Assange’s investigations demonstrated how useless and senseless could be protection of intellectual property in conditions of developed information and communication technologies. PIP leads to very substantial loss of knowledge that could be observed on NASA Apollo mission example. Also PIP causes very significant damage to future generations’ interests, because the biggest knowledge protection is actually not allowing them use and improve existing knowledge in full extent. How loss of knowledge could be stopped and overcome? Very interesting pattern of entirely new interrelation practice is wikinomics – economy of mass collaboration. It means peer production, open innovations and, after all, network, not hierarchical organization. And these changes lead to substantial shifts in organization of society and economy.


Keywords
creative economy; creatosphere; open innovation; wikinomics; the ownership by everybody of everything; private intellectual property; NASA; NineSigma

References

Buzgalin A.V. (2017a) Creative economy: Private intellectual property or ownership by everybody of every - thing? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 43–53. (In Russ.)

Buzgalin A.V. (2017b) Creative economy: Why and how private intellectual property can be limited. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 20–30. (In Russ.)

Chesbrough H.W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Dzhmuhadze A. (2007) Brains for Sale. Sekret firmyi [Secret of Firm]. No. 35 (218): 46. (In Russ.)

Galbraith J. (1967) New Industrial Society. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.

Kolganov A.I. (2002) Property on Knowledge as a Retarder of Economic and Social Development. Alternativy [Alternatives]. No. 1: 14–31. (In Russ.)

Newell H.E. (2010) Beyond the Atmosphere: Early Years of Space Science. New York: Dover Publications.

Pavlov M. U. (2016) Forming and Using Human Creative Potential in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Moscow: ekonomicheskiy fakultet MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova: electronic edition. (In Russ.)

Porohovskiy A.A. (2016) Political Economy in the 21st century: system approach to modern economy problems solution. Voprosy Politicheskoy Ekonomii [Questions of Political Economy]. No. 4: 8–22. (In Russ.)

Reach for Your Dreams Graduate: Recharge Your Life with True and Courageous Stories of Individuals Who Would Not Accept Defeat (2005). White Stone Books.

Tapskott D., Wilyams E. (2009) Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Change Everything. Moscow: BestBusinessBooks. (In Russ.)

Content No 3, 2018