Students' Attitude to Doping Practices in Russia, China, USA and India

Students' Attitude to Doping Practices in Russia, China, USA and India


Sinyutin M.V.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Professor, Saint Petersburg State University, Assoc. Researcher, Sociological Institute, RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia m.sinutin@spbu.ru

Ivan E.

PhD, Professor at Saint John’s University, New York, USA ivane@stjohns.edu

Tewari S.

PhD, Board Member of the Indian Sociological Society, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India tewarisan67@gmail.co

Jin Junkai

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assistant Research fellow (postdoc) at School of Health and Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China; Associate Researcher, Sociological Institute, RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia jjk@sxu.edu.cn

ID of the Article: 8229


For citation:

Sinyutin M.V., Ivan E., Tewari S., Jin Junkai Students' Attitude to Doping Practices in Russia, China, USA and India. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2020. No 7. P. 148-154




Abstract

Sport is a special sphere of public space in modern society, which is formed due to the complex interaction of various social agents. Based on the results of a comparative study of students’ attitudes in Russia, China, the United States, and India, the authors tried to identify common and special features of attitude to doping in sports, as well as related national, cultural, and political characteristics. There are two types of attitudes to stimulants and doping: “Indian-American”, with a high degree of rejection, and “Russian-Chinese”, with a medium degree of rejection. The article presents students‘ assessments of doping practices in different countries, as well as their attitude to the validity of accusations against Russian athletes for using doping in recent years.


Keywords
sociology of sport; sports public; doping; student youth; comparative research

References

Аникина А.В., Аникин В.И. Допинг в спорте как исследовательская проблема: обзор российских публикаций // Педагогико-психологические и медико-биологические проблемы физической культуры и спорта (Российский журнал физического воспитания и спорта ). 2018. Т. 13. № 4. С. 48–54. [Anikina A.V., Anikin V.I. (2018) Dope in Sport as Research Topic (Russian Contributions Review). Pedagogiko-psikhologicheskie i mediko-biologicheskie problemy fizicheskoy kultury i sporta (Rossijskiy zhurnal fizicheskoy vospitaniya i sporta) [The Russian Journal of Physical Education and Sport (Pedagogical-Psychological and Medico-Biological Problems of Physical Culture and Sports)]. Vol. 13. No. 4: 48–54. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.14526/2070-4798-2018-13-4-48-54.

Бабанов И.В., Гришина Е.А. Современный спорт – проблемы и противоречия // Социологические исследования. 2018. № 6. С. 116–124. [Babanov I.V., Grishina E.A. (2018) Modern Sports – Problems and Contradictions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 116–124. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518060107.

Тевари С., Гонашвили А.С., Синютин М.В. Отношение жителей Санкт-Петербурга к допингу в спорте: материалы социологического исследования // Теория и практика физической культуры. 2018. № 6. C. 90–91. [Tewari S., Gonashvili A.S., Sinyutin M.V. (2018) Attitudes of Saint Petersburg Residents to Doping in Sports: Opinion Poll and Sociological Research. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury [Theory and Practice of Physical Culture]. No. 6: 90–91. (In Russ.)]

Хоберман Дж. 50 лет применения допинга и фармакологизация повседневной жизни // Логос. 2009. № 6(73). C. 134–146. [Hoberman J. (2009) Fifty Years of Doping and Pharmacologization of Everyday Life. Logos. No. 6(73): 134–146. (In Russ.)]

Backhouse S., McKenna J., Robinson S., Atkin A. (2007) WADA International Literature Review: Attitudes, Behaviours, Knowledge and Education – Drugs in Sport: Past, Present and Future. Social Science Research Fund. URL: http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/Backhouse_et_al_Full_Report. pdf (accessed 22.03.2020).

Brissonneau Ch., Montez de Oca J. (2018) Doping in Elite Sports. Voices of French Sportspeople and their Doctors (1950–2010). London: Routledge.

Breivik G. (1992) Doping Games: A Game Theoretical Exploration of Doping. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Vol. 27. No. 3: 235–253. DOI: 10.1177/101269029202700303.

Dunning E., Waddington I. (2003) Sport as a Drug and Drugs in Sport: Some Exploratory Comments. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Vol. 38. No. 3: 351–368. DOI: 10.1177/10126902030383006.

Morente-Sánchez J., Zabala M. (2013) Doping in Sport: A Review of Elite Athletes’ Attitudes, Beliefs, and Knowledge. Sports Medicine. Vol. 43. No. 6: 395–411. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x.

Content No 7, 2020