The Regional Dimension of Digital Skills Research
Popov E.V.
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Lecturer of the Department of Sociology, junior researcher of the Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, HSE University, Moscow, Russia epopov@hse.ru
The article is based on the study funded by the Basic Research Program of the HSE University.
Popov E.V. The Regional Dimension of Digital Skills Research. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 6. P. 65-75
The main research problem underlying the article is the bias in the results of analysing the level of digital skills when approximating variables are used. It is noted that this strategy is common in the Russian digitalisation researchers academic community. Instead of the approximating tactic, the article uses the established methodology of calculating the level of digital literacy by Eurostat used until the year 2021. The empirical basis of the study is Rosstat data. By analysing it the author demonstrates the differentiation of the Russian regions by key components of the digital literacy level: information and communication competences, the ability to solve everyday tasks and the ability to work with software. The cluster model developed in the course of the analysis allowed to identify three groups of regions differing in these components: leaders (21 regions), middle-ranking regions (43 regions) and lagging behind (21 regions). The leading regions include the Omsk and Murmansk Regions and the city of Moscow, while the lagging regions include the Republic of North Ossetia, the Magadan and Jewish Autonomous Regions. It was revealed that the overall level of digital literacy in the regions is influenced by economic indicators: the average index of the physical volume of GRP, the average size of wages, as well as the value component – a positive assessment of the impact of digital technologies on life in particular.
Abdrahmanova G.I., Vasilkovskiy S.A. (eds) (2022) Indicators of the Digital Economy: 2022: Statistical Collection. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Aissaoui N. (2022) The digital divide: a literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. No. 8/9: 686–708.
Dmitriev Ya.V., Alyabin I.A. et al. (2021) Development of Digital Skills among University Students: De Jure vs De Facto. University Management: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis.]. No. 2: 59–79. (In Russ.)
Fedorova N.V., Minchenkova O. Yu., Makeeva V.G. (2020). Possibilities and risks of digitalization of the economy and society. Nauka I iskusstvo upravlenia [Science and art of management]. No. (3/4): 25–37. (In Russ.)
Fedoseeva S.S., Glezman L.V., Yelkin S.A. (2022) Digital literacy of the population as the basis for the development of digital economy in Russia and the regions. Upravlencheskii uchet [Management Accounting]. No. 11: 948–955.
Gaslikova I.R., Gokhberg L.M. (2001) Informational technologies in Russia. Moscow: TSISN. (In Russ.)
Gil-Garcia J.R., Helbig N.C., Ferro E. (2006) Is it only about internet access? An empirical test of a multidimensional digital divide. Electronic Government, Proceedings: 139–149.
Gladkova A.A., Garifullin V.Z., Ragnhedda M. (2019) Model of three levels of digital inequality: current opportunities and limitations (on the example of the study of the Republic of Tatarstan). Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta. Ser. 10. Zhurnalistika [Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 10. Journalism]. No. 4: 41–72. (In Russ.)
Gokhberg L.M., Bokh-Nilsen P. (eds) (2007) Statistics of the Information Society in Russia: Harmonization with International Standards. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Gruzdeva M.A. (2020) Digital Skills and Benefits of Using Digital Services: Signs of Territorial Asymmetry. Human Progress. [Human Progress]. No. 4: 1–12. (In Russ.)
Hargittai E., Hinnant A. (2008) Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research. No. 5: 602–621.
Jones S.E. (2013) Against technology: From the Luddites to neo-Luddism. New York: Routledge.
Kuzina L.S., Popov E.V. (2023) Real benefits of the virtual world. In: Express Information ISSEK HSE. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/839773040.html (accessed 26.04.2024). (In Russ.)
Kuzina L.S., Popov E.V., Shcherbakov R.A. (2023) Almost All Households in Russia Connect to the Network at High Speeds. In: Express Information ISSEK HSE. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/828416272.html (accessed 01.06.2023). (In Russ.)
Kuznetsov N.V. (2020). Universal digitalization and social risks. Obshestvo: politica, economika, pravo [Society: politics, economics, law]. No. 10: 42–47. (In Russ.)
Popov E.V. (2022) How the Pandemic Has Affected the Level of Digital Skills of Russians. In: Express Information ISSEK HSE. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/704025190.html (accessed 01.06.2023). (In Russ.)
Popov E.V. (2023) Features of Measuring Digital Literacy in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies.]. No. 11: 51–61. (In Russ.)
Popov E.V., Strel’tsova E.A. (2022) Digital Skills of the Population in Regions. In: Express Information ISSEK HSE. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/767681612.html (accessed 29.08.2023). (In Russ.)
Prensky M. (2001) “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1”. On the Horizon. Vol. 9 No. 5: 1–6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816.
Prokhorov P.E. (2022) Statistical Assessment of the Development of Digital Skills of the Employed Population in the Russian Federation. Statistika i ekonomika. [Statistics and Economics.]. No. 3: 25–38. (In Russ.)
Sadyrtdinov R.R. (2020) The level of digitalization of Russian regions. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosun-ta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University]. No. 10(444): 230–235.
Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A. (eds) (2013) Digital Competence of Adolescents and Parents. Results of the All-Russian Study. Moscow: FRI. (In Russ.)
Varlamova Yu.A. (2022) The Intergenerational Digital Divide in Russia. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russian. Sociology. Ethnology]. No. 2: 51–74. (In Russ.)
Zemtsov S.P.P., Demidova K.V., Kichaev D. Yu. (2022) Internet distribution and interregional digital inequality in Russia: trends, factors and impact of the pandemic. Baltiiskii region [Baltic Region]. No. 4: 57–78. (In Russ.)