printAcademic Discourse of the Sociological Studies in the Texts by Its Former Head Editor
Tepavčević M.
Assist. Prof., Faculty of Philology, University of Montenegro, Nikšić, Montenegro migat@t-com.me
Tepavčević M. Academic Discourse of the Sociological Studies in the Texts by Its Former Head Editor. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 7. P. 30-36
This article aims at drawing attention to the reflexivity of the Russian academic discourse, which is primarily conditioned by the authors’ cultural tradition, but also by the particular features of the genre in which it is articulated. By analyzing certain elements of the discursive reflexivity in the academic articles written in Russian, it is possible to reach a conclusion about the extent of its presence in the Russian language, about the manners in which it is used in the analyzed texts, as well as about the stylistic preferences of the Russian-speaking authors.
Blagojević S. Akademski diskurs pod lupom kontrastivne analize // Lingvističke analize. Zbornik u čast 25 godina Instituta za strane jezike u Podgorici. Podgorica: Institut za strane jezike, 2004. S. 97–109. [Blagojević S. (2004) My Zodiac Sign Is Virgo. Academic Discourse under Lupus Contrast Analysis. In: Language Analysis. Proceedings in Honor of the 25-year-old Institute of Foreign Languages in Podgorica. Podgorica: Institute of foreign languages: 97–109. (In Croat.)]
Blagojević S. Autorovo ograđivanje kao retorička strategija u akademskom diskursu: kontrastivna analiza // Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakultata. Novi Sad, 2007. 37. S. 125–133. [Blagojević S. (2007) Author's Fence as a Rhetorical Strategy in Academic Discourse: Contrast Analysis. In: Proceedings of the Faculty of Philosophy. 37. Novi Sad: 125–133. (In Croat.)]
Blagojević S. «Mi» kao «mi» ili «mi» kao «ja»: prvo lice množine kao eksponent autorovo prisustva u akademskom pisanom diskursu // Zbornik matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku. Novi Sad. 2011. 54/2. S. 207–218. [Blagojević S. (2011) «We» as «We» or «We» as «I»: the First Person Plural as an Exhibitor of the Author's Presence in Academic Written Discourse. In: Proceedings of Serbian Philology and Linguistics. 54/2. Novi Sad: 207–218. (In Croat.)]
Blagojević S. Diskursna refleksivnost u akademskim tekstovima – kontrastivni pristup // Leksika, gramatika, diskurs. Zbornik u čast Veri Vasić. Novi Sad. 2014. S. 439–457. [Blagojević S. (2014) Discourse Reflexivity in Academic Texts-contrast Approach. In: Vocabulary, Grammar, Discourse. Choir in honor of Vera Vasich. Novi Sad: 439–457. (In Croat.)]
Fuko M. Reči i stvari. Beograd: Nolit, 1971. [Foucault M. (1971) Words and Things. Belgrade: Nolit. (In Serb.)]
Katnić-Bakaršić M. Između diskursa moći i moći diskursa. Zagreb: Naklada Zoro, 2012. [Katnić-Bakaršić M. (2012) Between the Discourse of Power and the Power of Discourse. Zagreb: Naklada Zoro. (In Croat.)]
Klikovac D. O naučnom funkcionalnom stilu // Književnost i jezik. Beograd. 2004. 51/1–2: 23–38. [Klikovac D. (2004) About Scientific Functional Style. Literature and Language. 51/1–2: 23–38. (In. Serb.)]
Ristić D. Značenja delanja: sociološka analiza diskurzivnih praksi ideologije. Doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad, 2015. [Ristić D. (2015) Division Values: a Sociological Analysis of the Discursive Practices of Ideology. Doctoral thesis. Novi Sad. (In Croat.)]
Crismore A., Farnsworth R. (1990) Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse. In: Nash W. (ed.). The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE: 118–136.
Keller R. (2013) Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage Publications.
Lyons J. (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mauranen A. (1993) Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Text-Linguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Toumi N. (2009) A Model for the Investigation of Reflexive Metadiscourse in Research Articles. Language Studies Working Papers. University of Reading. 1: 64–73.