Subjective Well-Being: the Problem of Analyzing Population Qualitative Heterogeneity (Part 1)

Subjective Well-Being:
the Problem of Analyzing Population Qualitative Heterogeneity (Part 1)


Kuchenkova A.V.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., Senior Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. a.v.kuchenkova@gmail.com

Tatarova G.G.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. tatarova-gg@rambler.ru

ID of the Article:

Rubric: Methodology and methods of sociological studies

For citation:

Kuchenkova A.V. , Tatarova G.G. Subjective Well-Being: the Problem of Analyzing Population Qualitative Heterogeneity (Part 1). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 4. P. 14-25


 Full Text.


Abstract

The article discusses importance of the methodological problem of analyzing the qualitative heterogeneity of a set of objects in the process of sociological measuring of subjective well-being. It presents the results of an exploratory study aimed at testing a number of tools in procedures of reconstructing social types among the population as qualitatively homogeneous latent formations (according to the nature of subjective well-being). Taking as preconditions, the authors proceed from the existence of five group problems of a theoretical and methodological nature, the formulation and solution of which presumably contribute to developing a methodology for studying qualitative heterogeneity. This part of the article, first, substantiates the existence of a request for methodological reflecting the use of generalized indicators of subjective well-being (life satisfaction, personal happiness) in mass surveys, the importance of the transition to multidimensional models of measurement and analysis implemented within the conceptual framework of the typological method of social knowledge. Second, the complete set of particular indicators and the logic of their selection for typological analysis are offered (the results will be presented in the second part of the article). Third, the problem of studying the relationship between indicators of subjective well-being is raised from the perspective of forming the basis for the typology.


Keywords
qualitative heterogeneity; subjective well-being; generalized indicator of subjective well-being; particular indicators of subjective well-being; typological analysis; type-forming feature; typological structure; basis for the typology

References

Balatsky Y.V. (2005) Life Satisfaction Factors: Measurement and Integral Indicators. Monitoring obshchest vennogo mneniya [Monitoring of Public Opinion]. No. 4(76): 42–52. (In Russ.)

Bessokirnaya G.G., Temnitsky A.L. (2000) Workers at a private enterprise: life satisfaction. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 33–37. (In Russ.)

Bojanowska A., Zalewska A.M. (2016) Lay Understanding of Happiness and the Experience of Well-Being: Are Some Conceptions of Happiness More Beneficial than Others? Journal of Happiness Studies. Vol. 17: 793–815.

Cummins R.A., Eckersley R. et al. (2003) Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Austra lian Unity Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 64: 159–190.

Cummins R.A. (1996) The Domains of Life Satisfaction: An Attempt to Order Chaos. Social Indicators Re search. Vol. 38. Iss. 3: 303–328.

Delle Fave A., Brdar I. et al. (2016) Lay Definitions of Happiness across Nations: The Primacy of Inner Har mony and Relational Connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 7. Art. 30: 1–23. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00030.

Diener E., Diener C. (1996) Most people are happy. Psychological science. Vol. 7. Iss. 3: 181–185.

Diener E., Lucas R.E., Oishi S. (2018) Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being. Collabra: Psychology. Vol. 4. Iss. 1. Art. 15: 1–49. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.115.

Diener E., Suh E., Oishi S. (1997) Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychol ogy. Vol. 24. Iss. 1: 25–41.

Easterlin R.A., Sawangfa O. (2009) Happiness and Domain Satisfaction: New Directions for the Eco nomics of Happiness. In: Dutt A.K., Radcliff B. (eds.) Happiness, Economics and Politics. Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 70–96.\

Eid M., Langeheine R., Diener E. (2003) Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup la tent class analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Vol. 34. No. 2: 195–210.

Information and Analytical Bulletin (INAB). (2020) No. 1. Subjective and objective well-being in modern Rus sian society: results of empirical research. URL: https://www.isras.ru/index.php?page_id=1198&id=9089 DOI: 10.1525/collabra.115. (In Russ.)

Hashenko V.A. (2007) Subjective economic well-being typology. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 28. No. 1: 57–69. (In Russ.)

Krasko J., Intelisano S., Luhmann M. (2022) When Happiness is Both Joy and Purpose: The Complexity of the Pursuit of Happiness and Well-Being is Related to Actual Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Stud ies. Vol. 23(7): 1–29.

Kuchenkova A.V., Tatarova G.G. (2019) “Life-cycle Stage” as a Determinant of Personal Subjective Wellbeing. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 30–43. DOI:  10.31857/S013216250006135–1. (In Russ.)

Loewe N., Bagherzadeh M. et al. (2014) Life Domain Satisfactions as Predictors of Overall Life Satisfaction Among Workers: Evidence from Chile. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 118: 71–86.

Mareeva S.V. (2018) Subjective well-being and ill-being zones in the Russian society. Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. Vol. 18. N. 4: 695–707. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-4-695-707 (In Russ.)

McAdams K.K., Lucas R.E., Donnellan M.B. (2012) The Role of Domain Satisfaction in Explaining the Para doxical Association Between Life Satisfaction and Age. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 109: 295–303.

McMahan E.A., Estes D. (2011) Hedonic Versus Eudaimonic Conceptions of Wellbeing: Evidence of Dif ferential Associations with Self-reported Well-being. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 103(1): 93–108.

Myagkov A. Yu. (2015) Diagnostics and measurement of students’ social well-being: grounding of the method. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya [Sociology of Education]. No. 7: 102–113. (In Russ.)

Oishi Sh., Diener E. et al. (1999) Value as a Moderator in Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Personality. Vol. 67. Iss. 1: 157–184.

Ponocny, I., Weismayer, C. et al. (2016) Are Most People Happy? Exploring the Meaning of Subjective Well-Being Ratings. Journal of Happiness Studies. Vol. 17. Iss. 6: 2635–2653.

Schimmack U. (2008) The Structure of Subjective Well-Being. In: Eid M., Larsen R.J. (eds.) The Science of  Subjective Well-Being. New York: The Guilford Press: 97–123.

Shilova V.A. (2019) Classification of Communicative Strategies in the Implementation of Management Deci sions. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. Vol. 7. No. 3: 136–150. DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2019.7.3.6694. (In Russ.)

Shirokanova A.A. (2020) Trends of Subjective Well-being in Russia: 1998–2018. Vestnik SPbGU. Sotsi ologiya [Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg University. Sociology]. Vol. 13. No. 1: 4–24. DOI: 10.21638/ spbu12.2020.101. (In Russ.)

Sirgy M.J., Kim M.Y. et al. (2020) The Relationship Between Domain Satisfaction and Domain Importance: The Moderating Role of Depression. Journal of Happiness Studies. Vol. 21. Iss. 6: 2007–2030.

Tatarova G.G. (2007) Fundamentals of typological analysis in sociological research. Moscow: Vysshee obra zovanie i nauka. (In Russ.)

Tatarova G.G. (2012) The concept of “social type” in empirical research. In: Sociology and society: global challenges and regional development: Materials of the IV Regular All-Russian Sociological Congress. Moscow: ROS: 7187–7194. 1 CD ROM. (In Russ.)

Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaya G.P., Kuchenkova A.V. (2021) Subjective Well-Being at Work: Research Prac tices of Sociological Measurement. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No 10: 37–49. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250015546-3. (In Russ.)

Tatarova G.G., Kuchenkova A.V. (2016) Indicators of Subjective Well-being as Characteristics for Typology Building. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 21–32. (In Russ.)

Tatarova G.G., Kuchenkova A.V. (2020) “Life Satisfaction” and “Personal Happiness” in the Sociological Studies of Subjective Well-being. In: Gorshkov M.K. (ed.) Reforming Russia: Yearbook. Iss. 18. Moscow: Novyy khronograf: 565–589. DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2020.24. (In Russ.)

Tatarova G.G., Kuchenkova A.V. (eds.) (2023) Typological analysis in sociology as a diagnostic procedure. Moscow: FNISTC RAN. (In Russ.)

Tikhonova N. (2015) Russians’ life satisfaction: dynamics and factors. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremen nost’ [Social sciences and modernity]. No. 3: 19–33. (In Russ.)

Tolstova Yu.N. (1986) Ensuring the homogeneity of initial data in the process of applying mathematical methods. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 49–154. (In Russ.)

Trotsuk I.V. (2020) We are happy, prosperous, or pretending: a social request for methodological reflec tion. In: Kuleshova A.V. (ed.) Materials of the X International Sociological Grushin Conference “Living  in Russia. Live in peace. Sociology of everyday life”, May 20 – November 14, 2020. Moscow: VTsIOM: 107–112. (In Russ.)

Voronin G.L., Zakharov V.Y. Kozyreva P.M. (2016) “Who lives well in Russia?” 1994–2013 Monitoring survey. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 22. No. 1: 26–53. DOI 10.19181/soc jour.2016.22.1.3918. (In Russ.)

Content No 4, 2024