Farming is an (Un)Rooted Social Group: Problem Statement

Farming is an (Un)Rooted Social Group:
Problem Statement


Velikiy P.P.

Leading Researcher, Institute of Agrarian Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saratov, Russia iagpran@mail.ru

ID of the Article:


This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 24-28-00219.


For citation:

Velikiy P.P. Farming is an (Un)Rooted Social Group: Problem Statement. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 5. P. 79-88




Abstract

The article examines the objective and subjective life prerequisites of modern Russian farming, a new group in the social village structure. Based on the parameters established in practice for the size of farming into small, medium and large groups, the author substantiated the main prerequisites for their rooting in the agro-industrial complex and the life of rural communities. Large farmers are the most securely rooted; medium-­sized farmers are weaker. Particularly dramatic is the situation for heads of small farms, whose number has decreased by half over ten years (from 2006 to 2016). It has been suggested that the resources of this group, primarily arable land, will eventually pass over to large farmers. Medium-­sized farmers are also close to this situation, mainly due to the lacking heirs capable of farming in rural conditions. This could lead to further reductions in the farming lifestyle. The author’s ideas are formulated on ways to rationalize the sociodynamics of the farms’ composition in order to maintain not only their economic and sociocultural role, but also the employment of the mass of rural residents. Actors of the farming way of life are the subject of transitional social states of society and its individual systems, where the lines of many economic, social and ideological players intersect. When realizing their life plans, they act in a space of uncertain future beyond their control.


Keywords
farming; survival rate; rooting; economic challenges; modernization; management

References

Agriculture in Russia. (2021) Stat. sat. Moscow: Rosstat. (In Russ.)

Alakoz V.V. (2022) Land for family farming – without it, the depopulation of rural settlements in many regions cannot be stopped. In: There Should be Farming in Russia. Vol. II. Family-­Type Farming: Potential, Development Practice. Moscow: OOO “Brein Print”. (In Russ.)

Bashmachnikov V.F. (2019) Farming in Russia Is to be. Moscow: Pero. (In Russ.)

Eriksson M., Dahlgren L., Emmelin M. (2013) Collective actors as driving forces for mobilizing social capital in a local community: what can be learned for health promotion? In: Social capital and rural development in the knowledge society. Ed. by H. Westland, K. Kobayashi. Edward Elgar: 273–299.

Glebov I.P., Chernenko E.V. (2015) Reproduction of Human Capital in Agroeconomics. Saratov: Saratov GAU. (In Russ.)

Gotz K., Ohmacht T. (2011) Research on mobility and lifestyle – what are the results? In: Mobilities: new perspectives on transport and society. Ed. by M. Grieco, J. Urry. Ashgate Publishing Limited: 91–109.

Kalugina Z.I. (2015) Market transformation of the Russian agricultural sector: Sociological discourse. Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN. (In Russ.)

Kazarezov V.V. (2000) Farmers of Russia: Essays on the formation. Moscow: Accord Kolos. Vol. 1. (In Russ.)

Meaning of Rural Life (A Sociological Analysis). (2016) Ed. by Zh.T. Toshchenko Moscow. (In Russ.)

Menke C. (1991) Das Leben als Kunstwerk gestalten? Zur Dialektik der postmodernen Asthetisierung. Initial: 383–395.

Mukhanova M.N. (2023) Enterpreneurship in the Russian agricultural sector. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Questions of theoretical economics]. No. 4: 155–173. (In Russ.)

Namrueva L.V. (2021) Transformation of rural life on the example of the South of Russia farms. Sociologicheskaja nauka i socialnaja praktika [Sociological science and social practice]. Vol. 9. No. 2: 163–176. (In Russ.)

Plusnin Ju.M., Zausayeva Ya.D. et al. (2013) Otkhodniki. Moscow: Novyy khronograf. (In Russ.)

Polbitsyn S.N. (2023) Taxonomic analysis of rural businessmen’s motivation. Prodovolstvennaya politika i bezopasnost [Food Policy and Security]. Vol. 10. No. 4: 645–662. (In Russ.)

Porter M. (2001) The impact of competition on the form of strategies. In: The Strategic Process. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)

Portes A. (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 24: 1–24.

Schuller T., Baron S., Field J. (2000) Social capital: A review and critique. In: Social capital: Critical perspectives. Ed. by S. Baron et al. Oxford University Press: 1–38.

Shevchenko I.O. (2018) Moscow region farmers’ life orientation or who are the “new peasants”? Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Filisofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie [RSUH Bulletin. “Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies”. Series]. No. 3(13): 63–72. (In Russ.)

Shkaratan O.I., Yastrebov G.A. (2007) Identification of real (homogeneous) social groups in Russian society: methods and results. Applied Econometrics. No. 3: 96–119.

Small forms of management in the agro-industrial complex. Moscow: ACCORD, 2022. URL: https://www.akkor.ru/sites/default/files/2022_02_akk_brsh_cifru_055_preview.pdf (accessed 22.05.24). (In Russ.)

Velikiy P.P. (2010) New Forms of Searching for Living Among Present-­Day Villagers. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9(137): 44–49. (In Russ.)

Weber M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley. Vol.1.

Zhukova T.A. (2020) Land and people. The Farmer’s Diary: a documentary essay. Krasnodar: KubGAU. (In Russ.)

Zhuravleva L.A., Zarubina E.V., Ruchkin A.V., Simachkova N.N., Chupina I.P. (2019) Farming as a way of life. Biznes. Obrazovaniye. Pravo. [Business. Education. Law.] No. 4: 81–86.

Content No 5, 2024