printRussians Between Futuroshock and Futuroeuphoria (perception of the future in the context of ideological preferences)
Latov Yu.V.
Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Cand.Sci. (Econ.), Chief Researcher at the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Center of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia latov@mail.ru
Latov Yu.V. Russians Between Futuroshock and Futuroeuphoria (perception of the future in the context of ideological preferences). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 12. P. 88-101
Based on representative data of all- Russian surveys of the the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Center in the 2000–2020s the paper reveals dynamics of indicators characterizing the prevalence of fear of the future (futuroshock) and the opposite confidence in a good future (futuroeuphoria), while also testing hypotheses about the relationship of these feelings with ideological preferences. Empirical data show that the problem of fear for the future, though not acute (this fear is inherent in about a quarter of Russians in the 2020s), but it definitely exists. The most alarming sign is growing fear of an uncertain future over the past decade. In addition, as analysis based on data for 2023 showed, the prevalence of futuro- shock and futuro- euphoric feelings is markedly related to adherence to different ideologies. Supporters of conservatism and sovereignty often show confidence in the future, but less often fear and despair of it, while adherents of socialist and Russian- nationalist values do the opposite. The gaps formed are not too large (no more than 10 percentage points), but are comparable to those gaps in the corresponding indicators that are formed under the influence of settlement differences.
Brodovskaya E. V., Sklyarova N. Yu., Ognev A. S., Kuznetsova S. V., Melnikov S. V., Lukushin V. A. (2023) Criticism of the Concept of Futur Shock in the Context of the Sovereignization of the National System of Education and Upbringing. Chelovecheskiy kapital [Human capital]. No. 10: 118–127. (In Russ.)
Delanty G. (2024). Introduction: Social Theory and the Idea of the Future. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 27. No. 2: 153–173.
van der Duin P., Lodder P., Snijders D. (2020) Dutch Doubts and Desires. Exploring Citizen Opinions on Future and Technology. Futures. Vol. 124: 102637.
Karacharovsky V. V. (2024) Reference Countries and Shocks to Russia’s Societal Security. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Research]. No. 12: 138–149. (In Russ.)
Latov Yu.V. (2019) Ideological Vectors and Scalars of Actions of Supporters of Change. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Research]. No. 12: 15–28. (In Russ.)
Latov V. Yu. (2021) From “Revolution” to “Transformations” and “Changes”? Development of Discourses of Analysis of Qualitative Social Changes. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. Vol. 9. No. 1: 7–22. (In Russ.)
Latova N. V. (2023) Socio-psychological State of Russian Society and Social Attitudes of Various Groups of Russians. Journal of Institutional Research. T. 15. No. 4: 62–78. (In Russ.)
Nestik T. A. (2021) Long-Term Orientation of the Individual. In: Development of Concepts of Modern Psychology. Moscow: Institute of Psychology: 538–565. (In Russ.)
Nestik T. A. (2014) Social Psychology of Time. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS. (In Russ.)
Polak F. (1973) The Image of the Future. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
Ravochkin N. N., Kravchenko S. N., Sergeeva I. A. (2023) Cultural Integration, Migration Processes and Social Differentiation as a Consequence of Futur Shock: Philosophical Analysis. Sotsial’no‑gumanitarnyye znaniya [Social and humanitarian knowledge]. No. 12: 99–103. (In Russ.)
Toffler A. (2004) Futurе Shock. Moscow, AST. (In Russ.).
Toffler A. (1970) Future Shock. New York: Bantam Books.
Tutton R. (2023) The Sociology of Futurelessness. Sociology. Vol. 57. No. 2: 438–453.
Zheltikova I. V. (2020) Studies of the Future and the Place in them of the Concept “Image of the Future”. Filosofskaya mysl’ [Philosophical thought]. No. 2: 15–32. (In Russ.)