printRussians' Views on the Necessary Social Policy:
Between Mid 2000s and the Corona Crisis of 2020
Lezhnina Yu.P.
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Research Fellow, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia lezhnina@list.ru
The article is prepared thanks to assistance by Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 17-78-20125P
Lezhnina Yu.P. Russians' Views on the Necessary Social Policy: Between Mid 2000s and the Corona Crisis of 2020. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2021. No 4. P. 50-60
The article is based on data from All-Russian studies of the FCTAS RAS 2006–2020 and describes the characteristics of the welfare attitudes of Russians. It is shown that the idea of liberalizing social policy is out of expectations of Russians, and not because of the “dependеnt culture” but due to the lack of opportunities to solve problems on their own: limited access to social infrastructure, poorly functioning institutions, lack of their own financial resources. Together with the constant deterioration of the social sphere conditions it determines the necessity for an operational response by this state. The main points of the social agenda, according to the population, are the implementation of the humanitarian functions of the state (with an emphasis on the healthcare sector) and guarantees of institutional conditions. The Russians’ expectations regarding the general logic of welfare policy are quite homogeneous among various social groups. It is slightly impacted by the current stage of the life cycle. Over the past 15 years, the attitude for social policy among Russians has become more conscious and balanced, with an understanding of the limited state capabilities. That is why, even before the pandemic, targeting was a key characteristic of the desired social support. The 2020 crisis situation did not exacerbate paternalistic sentiments, as it was in 2009 thus indicating relevant stability of Russians expectations from state and a chance to construe a new configuration of the social contract on their basis.
Авраамова Е.М. О пространстве возможностей реформирования социальной сферы // Общественные науки и современность. 2006. № 3. С. 18–22. [Avraamova E.M. (2006) The Space of Reforming the Social Sphere. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 3: 18–22. (In Russ.)]
Аникин В.А., Лежнина Ю.П., Мареева С.В., Слободенюк Е.Д. Кто и почему ищет государственной поддержки в новой России? // Мир России. 2020. Т. 29. № 1. С. 31–52. [Anikin V.A., Lezhnina Y.P., Mareeva S.V., Slobodenyuk E.D. (2020) The Factors behind the Demand of Russians for the State Support? Mir Rossii [World of Russia]. Vol. 29. No. 1: 31–52. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-1-31-52.
Дмитриев М.Э., Никольская А.В. Осенний перелом в сознании россиян: мимолетный всплеск или новая тенденция? // Общественные науки и современность. 2019. № 2. C. 19–34. [Dmitriev M.E., Nikol'skaya A.V. (2019) The Autumn Shift in the Sentiments of Russians: a Transient Episode or a New Trend? Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 2: 19–34. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.31857/S086904990004335-0.
Салмина А.А. Поменялись ли взгляды россиян на социальную политику? Анализ динамики и сравнение с другими странами. Социологические исследования. 2019. № 12. C. 91–103 [Salmina A.A. (2019) Did Russians' Welfare Attitudes Change? An Analysis of the Dynamics and Comparison with Other Countries. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 91–103 (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007748-5.
Тихонова Н.Е., Лежнина Ю.П., Мареева С.В., Аникин В.А., Каравай А.В., Слободенюк Е.Д. Модель доходной стратификации российского общества: динамика, факторы, межстрановые сравнения. М.; СПб.: Нестор-История, 2018. [Tihonova N.E., Lezhnina Yu.P., Mareeva S.V., Anikin V.A., Karavay A.V., Slobodenyuk E.D. (2018) The Model of Income Stratification of Russian Society: Dynamics, Factors, Cross-country Comparisons. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)]
Andreß H.-J., Heien T. (2001) Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review. Vol. 17. No. 4: 337–356. DOI: 10.1093/esr/17.4.337.
Arts W., Gelissen J. (2001) Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter? Acta Sociologica. Vol. 44. No. 4: 283–299. DOI: 10.1177/000169930104400401.
Baute S., Meuleman B., Abts K. (2018) Measuring Attitudes towards Social Europe: A Multidimensional Approach. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 137. No. 1: 353–378. DOI: 10.1177/000169930104400401.
Bean C., Papadakis E. (1993) Popular Support for the Welfare State: A Comparison between Institutional Regimes. Journal of Public Policy. Vol. 13. No. 3: 227–254. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X00001057.
Blekesaune M. (2013) Economic Strain and Public Support for Redistribution: A Comparative Analysis of 28 European Countries. Journal of Social Policy. Vol. 42. No. 1: 57–72. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279412000748.
Blekesaune M., Quadagno J. (2003) Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations. European Sociological Review. Vol. 19. No. 5: 415–427. DOI: 10.1093/esr/19.5.415.
Chung H., Meuleman B. (2017) European Parents’ Attitudes towards Public Childcare Provision: The Role of Current Provisions, Interests and Ideologies. European Societies. Vol. 19. No. 1: 49–68. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2016.1235218.
Domanski H., Heyns B. Toward a Theory of the Role of the State in Market Transition: From Bargaining to Markets in Post-Communism. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie. Vol. 36. No. 2: 317–351. DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600007578.
Edlund J. (2006) Trust in the Capability of the Welfare State and General Welfare State Support: Sweden 1997–2002. Acta Sociologica. Vol. 49. No. 4: 395–417. DOI: 10.1177/0001699306071681.
Finseras H. (2009) Income Inequality and Demand for Redistribution: A Multilevel Analysis of European Public Opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies. Vol. 32. No. 1: 94–119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00211.x.
Gelissen J. (2002) Worlds of Welfare, Worlds of Consent? Public Opinion on the Welfare State. Leiden: Brill.
Groskind F. (1994) Ideological Influences on Public Support for Assistance to Poor Families. Social Work. Vol. 39. No. 1: 81–89. DOI: 10.1093/sw/39.1.81.
Jæger M.M. (2006) Welfare Regimes and Attitudes towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited. European Sociological Review. Vol. 22. No. 2: 157–170. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jci049.
Mason D.S., Kluegel J., Wegener B. (1995) Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-communist States. New York: A. de Gruyter.
Svallfors S. (2003) Welfare Regimes and Welfare Opinions: A Comparison of Eight Western Countries. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 64. No. 3: 495–520. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025931414917.
Taylor-Gooby P., Leruth B. (eds) (2018) Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare: Social Policy Directions in Uncertain Times. Basinkstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Williams T., Hill M., Davies R. (1999) Attitudes to the Welfare State and the Response to Reform: A Report of Qualitative and Quantitive Research on Attitudes to the Welfare State and to Proposals for Reform. Research Report (Great Britain. Dept. of Social Security), 88. Corporate Document Services.