Eurasian Integration:
the Role of Russia’s Spatial Potential
Simonyan R.Kh.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Chief Researcher of the Institute of International Studies, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia simonyan.renald@yandex.ru
Simonyan R.Kh. Eurasian Integration: the Role of Russia’s Spatial Potential. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2022. No 8. P. 84-94
Territorial aspects of social processes, which are the subject of the study of the sociology of space, are becoming increasingly relevant for our country due to the expansion of economic ties between the West and the East and the increasing importance of the territory of Russia connecting the European Union and the countries of the Asia-Pacific region – the main beneficiaries in the future economic integration of Europe and Asia. In line with the sociology of space, the author examines the geostrategic potential of Russia in this process. The sociology of space contains two main meanings – physical, characterizing natural conditions, and social – the result of people’s activities to transform nature, the material environment, society and the person. The Russian state, which emerged on the foundation of European culture, developed in the process of close interaction with Asian cultures – first of all, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, which determines the special role of the Russian social space in the future unification of Europe and Asia into a single mega-continent. For Russia itself, this means that it has the prospect of converting its unique experience of centuries– old coexistence in a Christian state of various civilizations and cultures, as well as its geographical advantage – bi-continentality into real economic results. To substantiate the reality of this perspective, the author relies on a broad factual base.
Alexander J. (2000) Contradictions: The Uncivilizing Pressures of Space, Time, and Function. Soundings. Vol. 16: 96–112.
Baikov A.A. (2007) Western-central Europe’s and Asia’s Routes of integration. Mezhdunarodnye processi [International Processes]. No. 3: 4–17. (In Russ.)
Berger P., Lukman T. (1995). Social construction of reality. Moscow: Medium.
Bourdieu P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brzezinski Zb. (2010) The great chess board. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russ.)
Chauprade A. (2007) Géopolitique – Constantes et changements l’histoire. Paris: Ellipses.
Contessi N. (2015) Central Eurasia and New Great Game: Players Moves, Outcomes and Scholarship. Asian Security. No. 9: 27–34.
Durkheim Е. (1990) Les formes élémentaires de la religieuse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Filippov A.F. (2008) Sociology of space. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’. (In Russ.)
Freire M., Kanet R. (2010) Players and Regional Dynamics in Eurasia: The Return of the «Great Game». London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Gumilyov L.N. (1993) Rhythms of Eurasia: Ages and Civilizations. Moscow: Ecopros. (In Russ.)
Haushofer K. (2001) About geopolitics works of different years. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russ.)
Joann Pavel II (2005) Memory and Identity. Rossiya v globalnoy politike [Russia in Global Affairs]. No. 2: 202–207. (In Russ.)
Konrad N.I. (1972) West and East. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Krugman P. (1992) Geography and Trade. University of Michigan Press.
Lechner F. (1994) Simmel on Social Space. In: Georg Simmel. Critical Assessments. Vol. III. London and New York: Routledge: 96–101.
Lefebvre H. (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.
Levitov I.S. (1905) Yellow-Russia as the buffer colony. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)
Mackinder H. (1904) The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal. No. 4: 11–32.
Neumann I. (2004) The Use of the «Other». Images of the East in the formation of European identities. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russ.)
Romanov B.A. (1928) Russia in Manchuria (1892–1906). Leningrad: Vostochny institut. (In Russ.)
Russia in numbers. 2014. (2015) Quick statistic directory. Moscow: Rosstat. (In Russ.)
Simmel G. (1990) Selected works in 2 vols. Selected works. Vol. 1. Мoscow: Yurist. (In Russ.)
Simonyan R.H. (2019) Russian-Kazakh cooperation in the context of international project. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya [New and recent history]. 2019. No. 3: P. 129–138.
Simonyan R.H. (2010) The theory of mesosystems applied to the region. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 51–62. (In Russ.)
Simonyan R.H., Kochegarova T.M. (2019) Russian Diaspora in China, Chinese Diaspora in Russia: historical and political economic aspects. Gorizonty ekonomiki [Horizons of Economics]. No. 2: 93–99. (In Russ.)
Therborn G. (2021) Knowledge and power. International Sociology. No. 5: 647–703.
Throsby D. (2018) Economics & Culture. Мoscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Vernadsky V.I. (1991) Scientifics though as global phenomenon. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Witte S.Yu. (1960) Memoirs. Reading-Book in 3 Vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Soсekgiz. (In Russ.)