printRussian Scientists’ Motivation and Research Performance Issue
Temnitskiy A.L.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., the Sociological Department of the MGIMO University; Senior Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia taleksandr@list.ru
The article was prepared in the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: 075-15-2022-327).
Temnitskiy A.L. Russian Scientists’ Motivation and Research Performance Issue. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 3. P. 28-43
The paper deals with the problem of uncovering the motivation structure of Russian scientists’ research, assessing the role learning and self-fulfillment motives play in it and the way those motives are connected to their performance indicators. In order to do that, we propose a model of connection between needs and priority motives characteristic for scientists, uncover a hierarchy of research motives and the level of their fulfillment on the job, define a motivational core and explain its factor structure. We used data from an online survey of Russian scientists (N = 551) taken in the second half of 2022 as a database for our study. We have discovered two main motives for doing research: pleasure gained from one’s work and work independence. They are typical for more than a half of scientists. We found that the work independence motive had a substantial impact on performance. We estimated that out of independent variables used for the analysis, the variations in the academic degree, research field and organization type where scientists were employed had the most differentiating effect on the motivation structure. The factor analysis of motives manifesting in research enabled us to find a single factor propped up by learning values per se, unrelated to tangible, pragmatic or prestige concerns. Links to that factor yielded characteristics typical for increased productivity. Our conclusion is that motivation has a chance to remain a reliable element of scientific human capital only when intangible motives clearly dominate tangible ones.
Allahverdyan A.G. (2014) Personnel rise and decline in the post-war period of Soviet science (on the example of physical and mathematical sciences, 1950–1980s). Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy [Sociology of science and technology]. Vol. 5. No. 4: 61–70. (In Russ.)
Berdashkevich A.P. (2000) Russian science: state and prospects. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 118–125. (In Russ.)
Chernysh M.F. (2023) How To Be in the Current Situation? Upravleniye naukoy: teoriya i praktika [Science Management: Theory and Practice]. Vol. 5. No. 2: 12–18. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.1. (In Russ.)
Dolzhenko R. A., Karpilyansky, V. A., Khadi, R. A., Didenko, A. (2019). Motivation of young scientists for research activities in Russian regional universities. Obrazovaniye i nauka [Education and science]. No. 9: 122–153. (In Russ.)
Dushina S.A., Nikolaenko G.A., Evsikova E.V. (2016). Time to work in Russia? Young scientists in the context of institutional changes Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy [Sociology of science and technology]. Vol. 7. No. 3: 28–50. (In Russ.)
Gvozdeva G.P. (2010) Work in science: is the youth interested? Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of NSU. Ser.: Socio-economic sciences]. 2010. Vol. 10. Iss. 2: 24–41. (In Russ.)
Horodnic I.A, Zait A. (2015) Motivation and research productivity in a university system undergoing transition. Research Evaluation. Vol. 24. Iss. 3: 282–292. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv010Levinson K.A. (2019) Working hours of Soviet scientists of the post-war period Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya IV: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya [Bulletin of PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogy. Psychology]. Vol. 52: 75–110. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201952.75-110. (In Russ.)
Maslou A. (2016) Motivation and personality. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)
Merton R. (1968) The Matthew Effect in Science. Science. Vol. 5. No. 159: 56–63.
Rakin V.I. (2022) Open Science in Russia or the Enforcement of Scientific Creativity. Upravleniye naukoy: teoriya i praktika [Science Management: Theory and Practice]. Vol. 4. No. 4: 13–24. DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.1. (In Russ.)
Razina T.V. (2017) Cognitive motivation in the structure of motivation for scientific activity Psikhologiya obucheniya [Psychology of learning]. No. 9: 95–106. (In Russ.)
Ryan J.C. (2014) The work motivation of research scientists and its effect on research performance. R&D Management. Vol. 44. Iss. 4: 355–369. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12063.
Shmatko N., Volkova G. (2017) Service or Devotion? Motivation Patterns of Russian Researchers. Forsayt[Foresight]. Vol. 11. No 2: 54–66. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.1.54.66. (In Russ.)
Shmatko N.A. (2011) Scientific capital as a driver of social mobility of scientists. Forsayt [Foresight]. Vol. 5.No. 3: 18–32. (In Russ.)
Shuper, V.A. (2022) The Scientific Community between Confusion and Reactionarity. Upravleniye naukoy: teoriya i praktika [Science Management: Theory and Practice]. Vol. 4, No. 3: 171–188. DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.12. (In Russ.)
Social problems and factors of intensification of scientific activity. (1990) Ed. V.A. Yadov, D.D. Raikova. Mоscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Sorokin P.A. (2000) Sotsial’naya i kul’turnaya dinamika [Social and cultural dynamics]. St. Petersburg: RKhGI. (In Russ.)
Tatarinov Yu.B. (1986) Problems of assessing the effectiveness of fundamental research: logical and methodological aspects. Ed. V.A. Zhamin. Mоscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Volodarskaya E.A., Kiseleva V.V. (2012) Remuneration of scientists and motivation of scientific activity. Motivatsiya i oplata truda [Motivation and remuneration of labor]. No. 2: 154–167. (In Russ.)
Yadov V.A. (ed.) (1979) Self-regulation and prediction of social behavior of the individual. Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Zezina M.R. (1997) Material incentives for scientific work in the USSR (1945–1985) Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vol. 67. No.1: 20–27. (In Russ.)