Market and Property:
Socio-Economic Lessons of the Pandemia
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Director of the Center for Modern Marxist Studies, Prof., Department of Political Economy, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Head Researcher, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Visiting Prof., University of Cambridge (Cambridge, UK), Hainan Normal University (Haikou, P.R. China) and Harbin University (Harbin, P.R. China), Moscow, Russia email@example.com
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Laboratory on Comparative Studies of Socio-Economic Systems at the Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Chief Researcher, Institute of Economy, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia firstname.lastname@example.org
The article is based on the results of studies carried out at the expense of budgetary funds on the state order of the Financial University on the theme “Development of the theory of property relations in modern society”.
The authors explore the nature of the transformation of the main public institutions under a pandemic, focusing on the analysis of changes in the system of socio-economic relations. It is noted that the first symptoms of the global crisis arose before the pandemic and were further intensified. Based on the first empirical data on the consequences of the pandemic, the thesis is proved, developed by authors earlier, that market coordination relations are substantially complemented directly by public regulation. Changes in property relations and relevant contradictions in labor relations are revealed. The interests of various social strata and new impulses of income redistribution, reducing inequality, solidarity, and transformation in the system of values and motivation of the person are shown. A number of measures in the field of socio-economic policy and reforming institutions aimed at developing an optimal strategy for overcoming the crisis are proposed.
Amin S. (2004) The Liberal Virus: Permanent War and the Americanization of the World. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Amin S. (2010) The Law of Worldwide Value. 2nd ed. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Antipina O.N. (2014) Economy and Happiness: a Paradoxical Relationship. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia]. Vol. 181. No. 2: 45–60. (In Russ.)
Baudrillard J. (1981) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis: Telos Press.
Bodrunov S.D. (2018) Noonomy. Moscow: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V. (2018) Late Capitalism and its Limits: Dialectics of Productive Forces and Production Relations (to the 200th Birth Anniversary of Karl Marx). Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 2: 10–38. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V. (2019) State in the Economy of the XXI Century: Political Economy Interpretation. Ekomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [Economics of Contemporary Russia]. No. 3: 7–18. DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2019-3(86)-7-18. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2016) Theory of Systematically Development (Regularity) and Objectives of the Development of Selective Planning in Market Economy. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 1: 21–43. (In Russ.)
Engels F. (1961) Development of Socialism from Utopia to Science. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 19. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russ.)
Fromm E. (1990) To Have or to Be? Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
Gofman A.В. (2015) Conceptual Approaches to Analysis of Social Unity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 29–36. (In Russ.)
Gorshkov M.K. (2017) Russian Socium in the Conditions of Crisis Development: a Contextual Approach (article 2). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 5–13. (In Russ.)
Grinberg R.S., Rubinstein A.Ya. (2013) Individual & State: An Economic Dilemma. Moscow: Ves' mir. (In Russ.)
Khessin N.V. (1975) On the Historical and Genetic Approach to the Study of the System of Production Relations of Developed Socialism. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economics]. No. 6: 3–17. (In Russ.)
Khessin N.V. (1964). The Concept of “Cell” and its Methodological Significance. Voprosy Ekonomiki. No. 7. (In Russ.)
Lapin N.I., Ilyin V.А., Morev M.V. (2020a) Extremal Inequalities and the Social State (part 1). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 4–17. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008378-8. (In Russ.)
Lapin N.I., Ilyin V.А., Morev M.V. (2020b) Extremal Inequalities and Social State (part 2). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 20–30. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008491-3. (In Russ.)
Markets versus Socialism. (2019) In: Economic Report of the President. Together with The Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers. March 2019. Chapter 8. Maryland: Bernan Press: 381–426. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ERP-2019.pdf (accessed 05.05.2020).
Petukhov V.V. (2016) Crisis and Protection of the Citizens’ Labour Rights. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 86–96. (In Russ.)
Polterovich V.M. (2017) Institutions of Catching-up Development and Civil Culture. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia]. Vol. 205. No. 3: 314–328. (In Russ.)
Polterovich V.M. (2018) Towards a General Theory of Socio-economic Development. Part 2. Evolution of Coordination Mechanisms. Voprosy Ekonomiki. No. 12: 77–102. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018- 12-77-102. (In Russ.)
Volkov Yu.G. (2017) Solidary Activity in Russian Society: Creative Practice. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 41–48. (In Russ.)
Wallerstein I. (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.