Social Inaction at Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemics


Holavin A.O.

M. Sci. (Pol.), Assoc. Researcher, European University at St. Petersburg, Russia; R&D Desk Officer, Transport and Telecommunication Institute (Riga, Latvia). Gothenburg, Sweden Holavins.a@tsi.lv

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010722-7
ID of the Article:


For citation:

Holavin A.O. Social Inaction at Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemics. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2020. No 11. P. 139-148




Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic has a tremendous effect of societies globally. From structural level down to everyday life routine social actors faced uncertainty, transformation of social norms, critical “breaking” of society. Some social practices have disappeared, whereas other emerged, with middle class and upper middle-class academicians readily adapting to new reality, whereas working class and people with low resources struggle to adapt. The study presents evidence of confusion and a “responsible citizen” identity-building by the Russian-speaking social scientists living in different European countries amid the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated lockdown policies implemented across the continent. Sociology of nothing theory by Susie Scott is used to explain conscious acts of commission and unconscious acts on omission to explain non-action, non-presence and non-participation united under the umbrella term “social inaction” in regard to following and ignoring the new social norms of the lockdown reality, as well as a stark critique of “coronavirus scepticism” by the authors of 16 autoethnographic observation diaries written from March to early April and collected in the framework of the initiative project “Virus Diaries: Chronicles of Daily Life” by the Gender Programme of the European University at St. Petersburg. Numerous “inactions” understood as “symbolic objects”, had been witnessed and reflected by most authors, leading to a conclusion of sustainability and relevance of the sociology of nothing theory for the social crisis analysis.


Keywords
sociology of nothing; coronavirus; COVID-19 pandemic; autoethnography; non-action; social crisis; acts of commission; academic community

References

Белинская Е.П. Неопределенность как категория современной социальной психологии личности // Психологические исследования: электронный научный журнал. 2014. Т. 7. № 36. С. 3–3. [Belinskaia E.P. (2014) Uncertainty as a Category of Modern Social Psychology of Personality. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. Vol. 7. No. 36: 3–3. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2013.4.767.

Темкина А.А., Здравомыслова Е.А. Социология гендерных отношений и гендерный подход в социологии // Социологические исследования. 2000. № 11. С. 15–23. [Temkina, A.A., Zdravomyslova E.A. (2000) Sociology of Gender Relations and Gender Approach in Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 15–23. (In Russ.)] DOI: 0.1177/0891243216646713

Ahmad A., Mueller C., Tsamakis K. (2020) Covid-19 Pandemic: a Public and Global Mental Health Opportunity for Social Transformation? BMJ. Vol. 369. No. 8241: m1383. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1383.

Billings R.S., Milburn T.W., Schaalman M.L. (1980) A Model of Crisis Perception: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 25. No. 2: 300–316. DOI: 10.2307/2392456.

Blumer H. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bourdieu P. (1987) What Makes a Social Class? On The Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology. No. 32: 1–17.

Brekhus W. (1998) A Sociology of the Unmarked: Redirecting Our Focus. Sociological Theory. Vol. 16. No. 1: 34–51. DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.00041.

Burawoy M. (1998) The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory. Vol. 16. No. 1: 4–33. DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.00040.

Cohen A.K. (1965) The Sociology of the Deviant Act: Anomie Theory and beyond. American Sociological Review. No. 24: 5–14. DOI: 10.2307/2091770.

Fay N., Walker B., Swoboda N. (2017) Deconstructing Social Interaction: The Complimentary Roles of Behaviour Alignment and Partner Feedback to the Creation of Shared Symbols. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the. Cognitive Science Society. July 26–29, London, UK. DOI: 10.1016/j. cognition.2015.09.004.

Flick U. (2011) Mixing Methods, Triangulation, and Integrated Research. Qualitative Inquiry and Global Crises. Vol. 132. No. 1: 1–79. DOI: 10.4324/9781315421612-7.

Fone D., Dunstan F., Williams G., Lloyd K., Palmer S. (2007) Places, People and Mental Health: a Multilevel Analysis of Economic Inactivity. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 64. No. 3: 633–645. DOI: 10.1016/j. healthplace.2005.02.002.

Garfinkel H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Gayer L. (2018) The “Normality of The Abnormal”: Reconstructing Everyday Life in A Context of Civil War. Critique Internationale. Vol. 80. No. 3: 181–190. DOI: 10.3917/crii.080.0181.

Goffman E. (2009) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Green R. (2011) Nothing Matters. Alresford: Iff Books.

Kuhn M.H. (1964) Major Trends in Symbolic Interaction Theory in the Past Twenty-Five Years. The Sociological Quarterly. Vol. 5. No. 1: 61–84. DOI: 0.1111/j.1533-8525.1964.tb02256.x.

Kurth C. (2016) Anxiety, Normative Uncertainty, and Social Regulation. Biology & Philosophy. Vol. 31. No. 1: 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/s10539-015-9508-9.

Leaker D. (2009) Economic Inactivity. Economic & Labour Market Review. Vol. 3. No. 2: 42–46. DOI: 10.1057/ elmr.2009.27.

Lemert C.C. (2015) Sociology after the Crisis. London: Routledge.

Marks S.R. (1974) Durkheim's Theory of Anomie. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 80. No. 2: 329–363. DOI: 10.1177/0004865815585391.

Mattick P. (2011) Business as Usual: The Economic Crisis and the Failure of Capitalism. London: Reaktion Books.

McVeigh R., Smith C. (1999) Who Protests in America: An Analysis of Three Political Alternatives— Inaction, Institutionalized Politics, or Protest. Sociological Forum. Vol. 14. No. 4: 685–702. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021656121301.

Merton R.K. (1938) Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review. Vol. 3. No. 5: 672–682.

Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Montgomery J. (2004) Individual Adaptations to Cultural Contradictions: Using Non-Monotonic Logic to Reconstruct Merton’s Theory of Anomie. URL: https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~jmontgom/anomie.pdf (accessed 16.07.2020).

Sartre J.-P. (1943) Being and Nothingness. London: Routledge.

Scott S. (2018) A Sociology of Nothing: Understanding the Unmarked. Sociology. Vol. 52. No. 1: 3–19. DOI: 0.1177/0038038517690681.

Škokić T., Kirin R.J. (2017) The Shopping Center of Abnormal Normality: Ethnography of the Distribution Tent in the Refugee Camp in Slavonski Brod. Narodna Umjetnost [Folk Art]. Vol. 1. No. 54: 129–146. DOI: 10.15176/vol54no107.

Smith J.R., Hogg M.A., Martin R., Terry D.J. (2007) Uncertainty and the Influence of Group Norms in the Attitude–Behaviour Relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology. Vol. 46. No. 4: 769–792. DOI: 10.1348/014466606X164439.

Vince R. (2008) “Learning-in-action” and “Learning Inaction”: Advancing the Theory and Practice of Critical Action Learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice. Vol. 5. No. 2: 93–104. DOI: 10.1080/14767330802185582.

Weber M. (1949) Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.

Content No 11, 2020