Boundaries of Russian Patriotism (Case of Non-Reactive Classic Research)


Sikevich Z.V.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Department of Cultural Anthropology and Ethnic Sociology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia sikevich@mail.ru

Fedorova A.A.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Junior Researcher, Department of the History of Evolutionary Theory and Ecology, S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the RAS – St. Petersburg Branch, St. Petersburg, Russia. an-f@list.ru

DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014126-1
ID of the Article:


This article was prepared with the financial support of RFBR, project No. 19-011-00219.


For citation:

Sikevich Z.V., Fedorova A.A. Boundaries of Russian Patriotism (Case of Non-Reactive Classic Research). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2021. No 6. P. 134-146




Abstract

The article addresses patriotism in connection with manifestations of the Internet users’ Russian identity. To obtain consistent results related to Russian patriotism as a combination of collective and individual views, we used two opposite approaches for gaining quantitative and qualitative data. A virtual study examines 10 national and nationalist Russian communities based on the VKontakte network with a total number of participants about 1.07 million people. The research reveals unifying elements of collective ideas that demarcate group identity in Russian communities due to the conventional rapprochement between the terms “nationalism“ and “patriotism”. The empirical facts of non-reactive research and classical survey were fully comparable to typical collective representations. The survey (600 Internet users) revealed an internally contradictory interpretation between categories “patriotism” and “nationalism”, as well as their full or partial synonymity, also present in Russian Internet communities. It is argued that Russia is predominantly associated to great-power attributions and minimal orientation to cultural or economic values. Negative interpretation of patriotism and citizenship is caused by the perception of these categories as an expression of “loyalty” to the government, and not to the Fatherland. The study revealed a weak gender-and-age correlation of collective ideas, which indirectly indicates the patriotism is included into the content core of the Russian Internet users’ national identity. The authors’ methodology for studying the phenomena of patriotism, nationalism and citizenship, based on the content analysis of verbal constructs, has been tested.


Keywords
patriotism; nationalism; ethnic identity; civic identity; non-reactive strategy; virtual space; social desirability effect; we-concept; geopolitical distance

References

Fedorova A.A. (2019) Ethnic and National Groups Representations in the Network Space of Russian Ethnicity. Cand. Sci. (Sociol.) Dissertation. St. Petersburg: Falcon Print.

Khali I.A. (2017) Patriotism in the Russian: Typology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 67–74. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsov I.M. (2016). Variability of Patriotism Discourses in Everyday Consciousness of Russians. Vlast' [The Authority]. No. 7: 164–171. (In Russ.)

Lee R. (2000) Unobtrusive Methods in Social Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Lubsky A.V. (2017) Civil Patriotism: About the Compatibility of Patriotism and Civic Consciousness in Russian Society. Gumanitarii Yuga Rossii [Humanities of the South of Russia]. Vol. 23. No. 1: 42–59. (In Russ.)

Madinier G. (1995) Consciousness and Love: An Essay about “We”. Moscow: INION. (In Russ.)

Martynov M.Yu. (2009) Notes on the Concepts of “Patriotism” and “Nationalism”. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 138–141. (In Russ.)

Pink S., Horst H., Postill J. (2016) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practices. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Limited.

Romanovskaya V.B., Salnikov V.P. (2015) A Search of the National Idea in a Multipolar World. Pravovoe pole sovremennoy ekonomiki [The Legal Framework the Modern Economics]. No. 7: 44–50. (In Russ.)

Saunders R. (2011) Ethnopolitics in Cyberspace: The Internet, Minority Nationalism, and the Web of Identity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Sekerdej M., Roccas S. (2016) Love versus Loving Criticism: Disentangling Conventional and Constructive Patriotism. British Journal of Social Psychology. Vol. 55. No. 3: 499–521. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12142.

Shmatko O.N., Kravchenko I.N., Tufanov E.V. (2016) Topical Issues of Patriotic Education in Student's Environment. Vestnik APK Stavropolya [Agricultural Bulletin of Stavropol Region]. No. 3(23): 149–151. (In Russ.)

Sikevich Z.V. (2012) Ethnic Paradoxes and Cultural Conflicts in Russian Society. St. Petersburg: SPbGU. (In Russ.)

Sikevich Z.V., Fedorova A.A. (2018) To the Problem of Correlation between Real and Virtual Ethnicity. Sotsiodynamika [Sociodynamics]. No. 8: 43–49. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2018.8.27142. (In Russ.)

Sikevich Z.V., Kravinsky D.C., Possel Y.A. (2005) The Social Unconscious. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)

Vorob’ev V., Eremina E., Nedel’ko S. (2018) Symbols of the Russian State in Consciousness of the Student Youth. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 117–127. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250000767-6. (In Russ.)

Webb E., Campbell D., Schwartz R. (1966) Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally

Content No 6, 2021