Theoretical Heritage of Sociology Classics for the Analysis of Modern Society (The Case of L. Mumford Conception)

Theoretical Heritage of Sociology Classics for the Analysis of Modern Society (The Case of L. Mumford Conception)


Zarubina N.N.

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Department of Sociology, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia n.zarubina@inno.mgimo.ru

ID of the Article:


For citation:

Zarubina N.N. Theoretical Heritage of Sociology Classics for the Analysis of Modern Society (The Case of L. Mumford Conception). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2022. No 5. P. 15-24




Abstract

The article analyzes the potential of classical sociological theories for the research of modern societies. It is shown that the reason for the loss of interest in the classical heritage is the spread of vulgar interpretations of sociological postmodernism, radicalizing the rejection of theoretical meta-narratives, as well as presentism in the research attitudes of young sociologists. Using the example of L. Mumford’s “megamachine” concept, the heuristic possibilities of sociological classics for understanding social relations in a digital society are shown. There are similarities and differences of the “megamachines” of the past as machine-like social organizations created to maximize human labor, managerial, etc. functions with social connections mediated by digital media. The conclusion is made that the application of the “megamachine” concept to modern society actualizes an assumption that if in the societies of classical capitalism materialized labor had dominated the living (K. Marx), then in a digital society objectified by and embodied in symbolic systems and in complex techniques communication, information and intelligence assert their dominance over live communications and social connections.



References

Butenko I.A. (2000) Postmodernism as a reality given to us in sensations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 3–11. (In Russ.)

Foucault M. (1999) Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (In Russ.)

Kastels M. (2004) Internet Galaxy. Ekaterinburg: U-Factoryiya. (In Russ.)

Keasler D. Why do we need the classics of sociology? URL: https://literaturkritik.de/id/16957 (accessed 15.02.2022). (In Germ.)

Mumford L. (1963) Technics and Civilization. Harcourt, Brace & World. URL: https://books.google.ru/book sid=PU7PktesGUoC&pg=PA9&hl=ru&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed 16.02.2022).

Mumford L. (1986) Mechanical rhythm of life. In: Skepsis: Scientificand Educational Journal. Moscow: Progress: 225–239. (In Russ.)

Mumford L. (2000) The Myth of the Machine. Technology and Human Development. Моscow: Logos. (In Russ.) Platform capitalism: a new challenge for the proletariat. URL: https://work-way.com/blog/2017/11/09/ platformennyj-kapitalizm-novyjvyzov-dlya-proletariata/ (accessed 05.04.2020).

Rezaev A.V., Tregubova N.D. (2021) Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Sociality: New Phenomena and Challenges for the Social Sciences. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 1: 4–19. DOI: 10.14515/ monitoring.2021.1.1905. (In Russ.)

Romanovsky N.V. (2007) On the current stage of development of sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 22–31. (In Russ.)

Schwab K. (2016) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: EKSMO. (In Russ.)

Schwinn T. (2020) Classic twilight. 100 years of Max Weber in the context of the history of sociology and the current state of our discipline. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie [Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology]. Vol. 72: 351–381. (In Germ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (1999) Sociology: ways of scientific reformation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 3–15. (In Russ.)

Content No 5, 2022