printFuzzy Classifications in the Typological Analysis of Workers by Employment Instability
Kuchenkova A.V.
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. a.v.kuchenkova@gmail.com
Tatarova G.G.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. tatarova-gg@rambler.ru
Kuchenkova A.V. , Tatarova G.G. Fuzzy Classifications in the Typological Analysis of Workers by Employment Instability. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 10. P. 27-40
The article is devoted to the theoretical and methodological problems of identifying the typological structure of employees by the nature of employment stability / instability. It actualizes the issues of developing a technology for conducting typological analysis in those research situations when there is a need to apply special means of dividing the objects (respondents) into groups – methods of fuzzy classifications. These are situations when typological analysis is carried out based on mass surveys; it is possible to construct integral indices for measuring indicators of employment instability based on its features of both “objective” and “subjective” nature; there is a blurring of the structure of objects location in the space of classification variables and problems arise in assessing the degree of such fuzziness. The article presents the results of a search study that allows us to conclude that typological models based on the ideas of reconstruction of social types among workers can be interpreted as an instrumental tool for comparing typological structures of different social communities identified by the nature of employment instability. One group of results relates to reflection on the composition of typeforming features, the basic part of which consists of two indicators of employment instability, one of which represents “objective”, the other “subjective” features. Another group of results relates to the justification of the adequacy of fuzzy classification methods in our research situation, rather than clear classification methods (the case when an object unambiguously belongs to a certain class).
Andreenkov V.G., Tolstova Yu.N., eds. (1982) Typology and classification in sociological research. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Bobkov V.N., ed. (2018) Precarious Employment in the Russian Federation: Theory and Methods of Identification, Evaluation and the Vector of Decreasing. Moscow: KNORUS. (In Russ.)
Collier D., LaPorte J., Seawright J. (2008) Typologies: forming concepts and creating categorical variables. In: Box-Steffensmeier J.M., Brady H.E., Collier D. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 152–173. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0007.
Diomin A. (2022) Precarity index for psychological studies of the Russian labour market. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational Psychology]. Vol. 12. No. 4: 103–122. DOI: 10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-4-103-122. (In Russ.)
Galitskaya E.G., Galitsky E.B. (2013) Classification trees. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 84–87. (In Russ.)
Gasiukova E., Karacharovsky V., Yastrebov G. (2016) Unequal precariousness: on the origin and forms of social status instability of individuals and groups. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 3: 48–63. (In Russ.)
Gasiukova E.N., Petrova A.A. (2021) The subjective perception of employment instability: is it bad to be unstable? Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Journal of Economic Sociology]. Vol. 22. No. 3: 39–70. DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2021-3-39-70. (In Russ.)
Hudson J., Kühner S. (2013) Beyond indices: The potential of fuzzy set ideal type analysis for crossnational analysis of policy outcomes. Policy and Society. Vol. 32. Iss. 4: 303–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.003.
Khoroshilov D.A. (2021) Ontological, social and psychological precarity: ways of interaction in transitive society. Novyye psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [New Psychological Research]. No. 2: 64–83. DOI: 10.51217/npsyresearch_2021_01_02_04. (In Russ.)
Kuchenkova A.V., Kolosova E.A. (2018) Differentiation of workers by features of precarious employment. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny [Monitoring of PublicOpinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal]. No. 3: 228–305. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.15. (In Russ.)
Kvist J. (2007) Fuzzy set ideal type analysis. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 60. Iss. 5: 474–481. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.005.
McBeth S., ed. (2013) It’ s More than Poverty: Employment Precarity and Household Well-being / Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO), McMaster University and United Way Toronto. URL: https://labourstudies.mcmaster.ca/pepso/documents/2013_itsmorethanpoverty_report.pdf (accessed 03.09.2023).
Popov A.V. (2019) Influence of employment precarization on the employees’ position: sociological aspect. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya [Territorial development issues]. No. 5: 1–13. DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2019.5.50.8. (In Russ.)
Popov A.V., Soloveva T.S. (2020) Employment Precarization: an Analysis of Academic Discourse on the Essence and Ways of Measuring. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 103–113. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009618-2. (In Russ.)\
Shkaratan O.I., КaracharovskiyV.V., Gasiukova E.N. (2015) Precariat: theory and empirical analysis (polls in Russia, 1994–2013). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 99–110. (In Russ.)
Smirnova A.Yu. (2015) The Two-dimensional Approach to Job Insecurity in Foreign Literature: Psychological Content and Measurement. Izvestiya Saratovskogo un-ta. Novaya seriya. Ser. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika [Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy]. No. 4: 99–106. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2015-15-4-99-105. (In Russ.)
Strebkov D.O., Shevchuk A.V. (2022) What do we know about freelancers? Sociology of free employment. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Tatarova G.G. (2007) Fundamentals of typological analysis in sociological research. Moscow: Vysshee obrazovanie i nauka. (In Russ.)
Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaya G.P. (2019) Identification of Workers with an Enterprise in the Diagnostics of Production Situation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 43–56. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004585-6. (In Russ.)
Tatarova G.G., Kuchenkova A.V., eds. (2023) Typological analysis in sociology as a diagnostic procedure. Moscow: FNISC RAN. (In Russ.)
Temnitskiy A.L. (2022) Resource Potential of Precarious Employees in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 86–99. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250021065-4. (In Russ.)
Tolstova Yu.N. (1998) Mathematical methods in sociology. In: YadovV.A. (ed.) Sociology in Russia. Moscow: IS RAN: 83–89. (In Russ.)
Toshchenko Zh.T. (2021) The Public and Private Life World of the Precariat: Main Features and Landmarks. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 24–36. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016200-3. (In Russ.)
Vives A., Gonzáleza F., Moncadae S., Llorens C., Benach J. (2015) Measuring precarious employment in times of crisis: the revised Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES) in Spain. Gaceta Sanitaria. No. 29(5):379–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.06.008.
Vyatchenin D.A. (2004) Fuzzy methods of automatic classification. Minsk: Technoprint. (In Russ.)
Zadeh L. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information control. Vol. 8: 338–353. DOI: 10.1016/S0019–9958(65)90241-X.
Zadeh L.A. (1980) Fuzzy sets and their application in pattern recognition and cluster analysis. In: Wen Raizin J. (ed.) Classification and Cluster. Moscow: Mir: 208–247. (In Russ.)